ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)
2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

[#10830] New kill_thread function in eval.c conflict with a BeOS system function — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #9736, was opened at 01/04/2007 16:20

3 messages 2007/04/01
[#10831] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-9736 ] New kill_thread function in eval.c conflict with a BeOS system function — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/04/01

Hi,
[#10833] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-9736 ] New kill_thread function in eval.c conflict with a BeOS system function — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/04/02

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

[#10832] [PATCH] CGI [] error on non-existent parameter — <noreply@...>

Patches item #9753, was opened at 2007-04-02 14:31

1 message 2007/04/02

[#10834] Hefty patch for mkmf.rb — <noreply@...>

Patches item #9762, was opened at 2007-04-02 09:55

6 messages 2007/04/02
[#10835] Re: [ ruby-Patches-9762 ] Hefty patch for mkmf.rb — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/04/02

noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
[#10844] Re: [ ruby-Patches-9762 ] Hefty patch for mkmf.rb — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/04/03

Hi,
[#10850] Re: [ ruby-Patches-9762 ] Hefty patch for mkmf.rb — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/04/03

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#10868] Re: [ ruby-Patches-9762 ] Hefty patch for mkmf.rb — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/04/05

Hi,
[#10870] Re: [ ruby-Patches-9762 ] Hefty patch for mkmf.rb — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2007/04/05

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

[#10839] Fwd: Bug in Bignum.to_s (1.8.6 only) — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

1 message 2007/04/02

[#10840] String#[] does not use result of to_int — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #9661, was opened at 2007-03-29 14:56

1 message 2007/04/03

[#10841] Bignum.to_s fails for certain values and certain bases (1.8.6 regression) — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #9410, was opened at 2007-03-21 04:38

1 message 2007/04/03

[#10842] String#[] does not use result of to_int — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #9661, was opened at 2007-03-29 14:56

1 message 2007/04/03

[#10843] Time conversion from UTC to local appears to apply 2007 rules to 2006 dates — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #9220, was opened at 2007-03-13 06:19

1 message 2007/04/03

[#10845] Re: [ruby-cvs:19369] Ruby:r12133: * ext/openssl/{ossl.[ch],ossl_pkey.c} Add documentation. — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2007/04/03
[#10847] Re: [ruby-cvs:19369] Ruby:r12133: * ext/openssl/{ossl.[ch],ossl_pkey.c} Add documentation. — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/04/03

Hi,

[#10846] Windows Vista: recvfrom causes exception — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #9061, was opened at 2007-03-06 04:28

2 messages 2007/04/03
[#10848] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-9061 ] Windows Vista: recvfrom causes exception — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/04/03

Hi,

[#10849] Windows Vista: recvfrom causes exception — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #9061, was opened at 2007-03-06 04:28

1 message 2007/04/03

[#10851] alias_method oddness in 1.8.6 — ara.t.howard@...

1 message 2007/04/03

[#10852] net/http bugs — "Mihai Danila" <viridium@...>

I noticed a while back a few limitations in the Ruby net/http library.

1 message 2007/04/03

[#10853] Why limit class def to a constant or colon node? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>

Is there a historical reason why I can't do something like these:

12 messages 2007/04/03
[#10858] Re: Why limit class def to a constant or colon node? — "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...> 2007/04/04

On 4/3/07, Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@sun.com> wrote:
[#10859] Re: Why limit class def to a constant or colon node? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/04/04

Hi,
[#10860] Re: Why limit class def to a constant or colon node? — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2007/04/04

On Wed, 4 Apr 2007, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#10861] Re: Why limit class def to a constant or colon node? — "Chris Carter" <cdcarter@...> 2007/04/04

On 4/4/07, Hugh Sasse <hgs@dmu.ac.uk> wrote:
[#10862] Re: Why limit class def to a constant or colon node? — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2007/04/04

On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Chris Carter wrote:
[#10864] Re: Why limit class def to a constant or colon node? — "Brian Mitchell" <binary42@...> 2007/04/04

On 4/4/07, Hugh Sasse <hgs@dmu.ac.uk> wrote:
[#10865] Re: Why limit class def to a constant or colon node? — murphy <murphy@...> 2007/04/04

> Also makes me think: what about non-anonymous singleton classes?
[#10901] Re: Why limit class def to a constant or colon node? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2007/04/09

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#10902] Re: Why limit class def to a constant or colon node? — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2007/04/09

On 4/3/07, Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@sun.com> wrote:
[#10903] Re: Why limit class def to a constant or colon node? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2007/04/10

Rick DeNatale wrote:
[#10905] Re: Why limit class def to a constant or colon node? — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...> 2007/04/10

To get rid of ambiguity with extension, why not just say that "<"

[#10854] OpenSSL Elliptic Curve patch (please review) — <noreply@...>

Patches item #4704, was opened at 2006-06-08 04:04

1 message 2007/04/04

[#10855] performance enhancement for OpenSSL::Cipher::Cipher.update — <noreply@...>

Patches item #4463, was opened at 2006-05-13 06:55

1 message 2007/04/04

[#10856] Better error messages in OpenSSL::SSL.[accept, connect] — <noreply@...>

Patches item #4464, was opened at 2006-05-13 06:58

1 message 2007/04/04

[#10857] net/https peer_cert returning nil — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #9416, was opened at 2007-03-20 23:38

1 message 2007/04/04

[#10866] OpenSSL library not updated with new PKCS #12 features — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #7218, was opened at 2006-12-11 17:55

1 message 2007/04/04

[#10867] defined? operator changed in ruby 1.9: bug or feature? — David Flanagan <david@...>

The behavior of the defined? operator is different in current ruby 1.9

8 messages 2007/04/04
[#10871] Re: defined? operator changed in ruby 1.9: bug or feature? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/04/05

Hi,
[#10872] Re: defined? operator changed in ruby 1.9: bug or feature? — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/04/05

Thanks for the quick response and patch!
[#10873] Re: defined? operator changed in ruby 1.9: bug or feature? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/04/05

Hi,
[#10886] Re: defined? operator changed in ruby 1.9: bug or feature? — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/04/06

Even after applying the patch, I see a difference between 1.8 and 1.9:
[#10887] Re: defined? operator changed in ruby 1.9: bug or feature? — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2007/04/06

On 4/5/07, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#10889] Re: defined? operator changed in ruby 1.9: bug or feature? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/04/07

Hi,
[#10892] Re: defined? operator changed in ruby 1.9: bug or feature? — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2007/04/07

On 4/7/07, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#10869] Minor rdoc patch for sha2.rb — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>

Hi,

1 message 2007/04/05

[#10874] super reuses the variable holding the method id in method_missing — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...>

1 message 2007/04/05

[#10875] Ruby shouldn't process shebang! — "Kirill A. Shutemov" <k.shutemov@...>

> echo -e '#!test\nputs "test passed"' | ruby=20

5 messages 2007/04/05
[#10922] Re: Ruby shouldn't process shebang! — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...> 2007/04/15

On 4/5/07, Kirill A. Shutemov <k.shutemov@gmail.com> wrote:
[#10928] Re: Ruby shouldn't process shebang! — "Adriano Ferreira" <a.r.ferreira@...> 2007/04/16

On 4/15/07, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
[#10936] Re: Ruby shouldn't process shebang! — "Kirill A. Shutemov" <k.shutemov@...> 2007/04/16

On [Mon, 16.04.2007 20:23], Adriano Ferreira wrote:
[#10962] Re: Ruby shouldn't process shebang! — "Patrick Hurley" <phurley@...> 2007/04/18

On 4/16/07, Kirill A. Shutemov <k.shutemov@gmail.com> wrote:

[#10877] Syck php module causes core dump with empty/malformed input — <noreply@...>

Patches item #9878, was opened at 2007-04-05 08:51

1 message 2007/04/05

[#10878] OpenSSL::X509::Certificate.new is broken in the 1.8.5 libraries — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5995, was opened at 2006-10-02 22:16

1 message 2007/04/05

[#10879] Help building Ruby 1.9 on Windows — "Justin Bailey" <jgbailey@...>

I am looking for some advice on building Ruby 1.9 on windows. Following the

2 messages 2007/04/05
[#10881] Re: Help building Ruby 1.9 on Windows — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2007/04/06

Hello,

[#10880] OpenSSL::X509::Certificate.new is broken in the 1.8.5 libraries — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5995, was opened at 2006-10-02 22:16

1 message 2007/04/05

[#10882] OpenSSL::X509::Certificate.new is broken in the 1.8.5 libraries — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5995, was opened at 2006-10-02 22:16

1 message 2007/04/06

[#10883] Oniguruma/StringScanner performance issue — murphy <murphy@...>

The new Regexp engine still has an odd behavior which I think is a bug.

1 message 2007/04/06

[#10884] Ruby 1.9/1.8 compatibility: String#lines — murphy <murphy@...>

It seems the most important change in 1.9, in terms of compatibility, is

6 messages 2007/04/06
[#10890] Re: Ruby 1.9/1.8 compatibility: String#lines — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/04/07

Hi,
[#10891] Re: Ruby 1.9/1.8 compatibility: String#lines — murphy <murphy@...> 2007/04/07

> |It seems the most important change in 1.9, in terms of compatibility, is
[#10893] Re: Ruby 1.9/1.8 compatibility: String#lines — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2007/04/07

On 4/7/07, murphy <murphy@rubychan.de> wrote:
[#10897] Re: Ruby 1.9/1.8 compatibility: String#lines — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/04/08

Hi,
[#10898] Re: Ruby 1.9/1.8 compatibility: String#lines — murphy <murphy@...> 2007/04/08

> I'd suggest adding lines method to return an array of lines in the

[#10885] Re: Welcome to our (ruby-core ML) You are added automatically — "Famille Sow" <yayabmwos@...>

#unsubscribe

1 message 2007/04/06

[#10894] ENV['TZ'] = nil doesn't work in 1.9 — Daniel DeLorme <dan-ml@...42.com>

I just noticed that ENV['TZ'] = nil raises an error in 1.9

1 message 2007/04/08

[#10895] Unable to create new sessions by giving session_id in option. — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #9957, was opened at 2007-04-08 13:45

1 message 2007/04/08

[#10896] Unable to create new sessions by giving session_id in option. — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #9957, was opened at 2007-04-08 13:45

1 message 2007/04/08

[#10899] Inclusion of OpenSSL makes Ruby segfault — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #9525, was opened at 2007-03-24 22:16

1 message 2007/04/09

[#10900] Inclusion of OpenSSL makes Ruby segfault — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #9525, was opened at 2007-03-24 22:16

1 message 2007/04/09

[#10906] openssl segmentation fault — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8903, was opened at 2007-02-27 01:08

1 message 2007/04/10

[#10907] install (/bin/install) path hardcoded at build — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #10004, was opened at 2007-04-10 13:21

3 messages 2007/04/10
[#10935] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10004 ] install (/bin/install) path hardcoded at build — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/04/16

Hi,
[#10961] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10004 ] install (/bin/install) path hardcoded at build — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2007/04/18

On 4/16/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#10908] XMLRPC::ParseContentType#parse_content_type raises non-XMLRPC exception — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #2727, was opened at 2005-10-27 21:44

1 message 2007/04/10

[#10909] Turning off verbose output for mkmf — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>

Hi all,

4 messages 2007/04/11
[#10910] Re: Turning off verbose output for mkmf — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/04/12

Hi,
[#10912] Re: Turning off verbose output for mkmf — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/04/12

> -----Original Message-----
[#10913] Re: Turning off verbose output for mkmf — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/04/12

Hi,

[#10911] net/imap + openssl hangs — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #1706, was opened at 2005-03-31 06:04

1 message 2007/04/12

[#10914] Time.parse fails at different times than DateTime.parse — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #2019, was opened at 2005-06-11 22:06

1 message 2007/04/13

[#10915] Inconsistencies between Time and Date classes — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #10083, was opened at 2007-04-13 12:06

2 messages 2007/04/13
[#10926] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10083 ] Inconsistencies between Time and Date classes — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/04/16

Hi,

[#10916] Parser inconsistency, inside/outside of block — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>

Here's a strange one raised on ruby-talk:247831

2 messages 2007/04/13
[#10924] Re: Parser inconsistency, inside/outside of block — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/04/16

Hi,

[#10917] Testing net/http changes in ruby 1.9 and having trouble on Windows — "Justin Bailey" <jgbailey@...>

I have managed to build Ruby 1.9 on my windows machine, but Net::HTTP calls

1 message 2007/04/13

[#10918] Test Message -- Ignore — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

Test Message -- Please Ignore -- Making Sure Email Account was Fixed!

1 message 2007/04/14

[#10919] Ruby Memory Layout — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

Does anyone have a chart or text that shows how

3 messages 2007/04/14
[#10920] Re: Ruby Memory Layout — "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...> 2007/04/14

On 4/14/07, Charles Thornton <ceo@hawthorne-press.com> wrote:
[#10946] Re: Ruby Memory Layout — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2007/04/17

On Apr 14, 2007, at 09:55, Charles Thornton wrote:

[#10921] each_with_index (Enumerable) does not forward arguments to each — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #10111, was opened at 2007-04-14 22:14

2 messages 2007/04/14
[#10925] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10111 ] each_with_index (Enumerable) does not forward arguments to each — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/04/16

Hi,

[#10923] block_given? => true in main(). — "Adam Bozanich" <adam.boz@...>

Hi all.

4 messages 2007/04/16
[#10939] Re: block_given? => true in main(). — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/04/17

Hi,
[#10940] Re: block_given? => true in main(). — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/04/17

Hi,
[#10943] Re: block_given? => true in main(). — "Adam Bozanich" <adam.boz@...> 2007/04/17

On 4/16/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#10927] class variables and inheritance — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8156, was opened at 2007-01-25 23:05

2 messages 2007/04/16
[#10945] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8156 ] class variables and inheritance — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2007/04/17

[#10929] Fwd: lib/cgi.rb: support for multiple CSS class values specified as an array — "James Greenfield" <james.greenfield@...>

First time submitting a patch so forgive any missteps on my part. This is a

1 message 2007/04/16

[#10930] IRHG - Garbage Collection — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

Would it be possible for someone to translate the

3 messages 2007/04/16
[#10931] Re: IRHG - Garbage Collection — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/04/16

Hi,
[#10932] Re: IRHG - Garbage Collection — Charles Thornton <ceo@...> 2007/04/16

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#10933] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #10140, was opened at 2007-04-16 17:32

10 messages 2007/04/16
[#10934] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10140 ] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — nobu@... 2007/04/16

Hi,
[#10958] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10140 ] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2007/04/18

On 4/16/07, nobu@ruby-lang.org <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#10960] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10140 ] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2007/04/18

On 4/16/07, nobu@ruby-lang.org <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#10967] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10140 ] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/04/19

Hi,
[#10970] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10140 ] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2007/04/19

On 4/19/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:> Hi,>> At Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:21:44 +0900,> Michal Suchanek wrote in [ruby-core:10960]:> > Yes. And this should also apply to extensions. The mkmf tests are now> > fine but the extension is linked with -L/sw/lib before -L../..>> Indeed.>>> Index: configure.in> ===================================================================> --- configure.in (revision 12191)> +++ configure.in (working copy)> @@ -1385,5 +1385,4 @@ if test "$enable_rpath" = yes; then> fi>> -LDFLAGS="-L. $LDFLAGS"> AC_SUBST(ARCHFILE)>This would break the previous fix so I did not even try to apply this ^
[#10979] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10140 ] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/04/19

Hi,
[#10988] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10140 ] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2007/04/20

On 4/19/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#10989] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10140 ] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2007/04/20

On 4/20/07, Michal Suchanek <hramrach@centrum.cz> wrote:
[#10985] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10140 ] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2007/04/20

On 4/19/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#10937] load behavior — "John Lam (CLR)" <jflam@...>

Consider this code:

4 messages 2007/04/17
[#10941] Re: load behavior — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2007/04/17

John Lam (CLR) wrote:
[#10942] Re: load behavior — "Nasir Khan" <rubylearner@...> 2007/04/17

IMHO it is definitely not a bug as Kernel.require would just load the
[#10951] Re: load behavior — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2007/04/18

John Lam (CLR) wrote:

[#10938] pp fails — <noreply@...>

Patches item #10155, was opened at 2007-04-17 00:48

1 message 2007/04/17

[#10944] IRHG - "Three Stuffing" — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

Can a japanese speaker give a translation

7 messages 2007/04/17
[#10949] Re: IRHG - "Three Stuffing" — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/04/18

Hi,
[#10952] Re: IRHG - "Three Stuffing" — Charles Thornton <ceo@...> 2007/04/18

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#10956] Re: IRHG - "Three Stuffing" — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/04/18

Hi,
[#10954] Re: IRHG - "Three Stuffing" — Charles Thornton <ceo@...> 2007/04/18
[#10955] Re: IRHG - "Three Stuffing" — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/04/18

Hi,
[#10957] Re: IRHG - "Three Stuffing -- Thanks for the help — Charles Thornton <ceo@...> 2007/04/18

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#10947] backwards compatibility for 'raise Interrupt' — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

** BEFORE:

9 messages 2007/04/17
[#10948] Re: backwards compatibility for 'raise Interrupt' — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/04/18

Hi,
[#11006] Re: backwards compatibility for 'raise Interrupt' — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/04/23

Hi,
[#11008] Re: backwards compatibility for 'raise Interrupt' — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2007/04/23

[#11013] Re: backwards compatibility for 'raise Interrupt' — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/04/24

Hi,
[#11040] Re: backwards compatibility for 'raise Interrupt' — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2007/04/26

[#11045] Re: backwards compatibility for 'raise Interrupt' — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/04/27

Hi,
[#11043] Re: backwards compatibility for 'raise Interrupt' — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/04/27

Hi,
[#11038] Re: backwards compatibility for 'raise Interrupt' — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2007/04/26

[#10950] pp fails — <noreply@...>

Patches item #10155, was opened at 2007-04-17 09:48

1 message 2007/04/18

[#10953] Re: MatchData matchset and matchtree — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2007/04/18
[#10978] Re: MatchData matchset and matchtree — TRANS <transfire@...> 2007/04/19

On 4/18/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#10959] test_cgi failure on OS X — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #10191, was opened at 2007-04-18 13:12

1 message 2007/04/18

[#10963] pp fails — <noreply@...>

Patches item #10155, was opened at 2007-04-17 00:48

1 message 2007/04/18

[#10964] net/https peer_cert returning nil — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #9416, was opened at 2007-03-20 23:38

1 message 2007/04/18

[#10965] openssl segmentation fault — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8903, was opened at 2007-02-27 01:08

1 message 2007/04/19

[#10966] OpenSSL::X509::Certificate.new is broken in the 1.8.5 libraries — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5995, was opened at 2006-10-02 22:16

1 message 2007/04/19

[#10968] IRHG - Manuscript Hunt — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

Does anyone know of a Text Copy (Not PDF) of this manuscript:

5 messages 2007/04/19
[#10971] Re: IRHG - Manuscript Hunt — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2007/04/19

Charles Thornton wrote:
[#10976] Re: IRHG - Manuscript Hunt — Charles Thornton <ceo@...> 2007/04/19

M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
[#10973] Re: IRHG - Manuscript Hunt — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/04/19

Hi,
[#10975] Re: IRHG - Manuscript Hunt — Charles Thornton <ceo@...> 2007/04/19

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#10969] IRHG - Machine Stack — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

Question: Are all stack operations in ruby limited to:

3 messages 2007/04/19
[#10972] Re: IRHG - Machine Stack — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/04/19

Hi,
[#10995] Re: IRHG - Machine Stack — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2007/04/21

On 19/04/07, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#10974] OpenSSL::X509::Certificate.new is broken in the 1.8.5 libraries — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5995, was opened at 2006-10-02 15:16

1 message 2007/04/19

[#10977] IRGH - Conv problem — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

OK Guys,

1 message 2007/04/19

[#10980] interpreter crashes in rb_readline — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #10238, was opened at 2007-04-19 21:38

1 message 2007/04/19

[#10981] ruby 1.9 crash on cygwin — "Anton Ivanov" <Anton.Ivanov@...>

Hi,

5 messages 2007/04/19
[#10984] Re: ruby 1.9 crash on cygwin — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/04/20

Hi,
[#10991] Re: ruby 1.9 crash on cygwin — "Anton Ivanov" <Anton.Ivanov@...> 2007/04/20

Thanks for the suggestion. Unfortunately I wasn't able to figure out
[#11000] Re: ruby 1.9 crash on cygwin — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/04/22

Hi,
[#11009] Re: ruby 1.9 crash on cygwin — "Anton Ivanov" <Anton.Ivanov@...> 2007/04/23

Hi,

[#10982] interpreter crashes in rb_readline — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #10238, was opened at 2007-04-19 21:38

1 message 2007/04/19

[#10986] IRHG - One Stack-Frame Pushed onto Stack for each Function Call?? — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

Each Ruby Function Call produces a Stack Frame, and

2 messages 2007/04/20
[#10987] Re: IRHG - One Stack-Frame Pushed onto Stack for each Function Call?? — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...> 2007/04/20

On 4/20/07, Charles Thornton <ceo@hawthorne-press.com> wrote:

[#10990] IRHG - Translation of Japanese Text in four images (gc.html) — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

I again need a translation of text in Images that can not

1 message 2007/04/20

[#10992] IRHG - Translation Request - With images this time! — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

I again need a translation of text in Images that can not

3 messages 2007/04/20
[#10993] Re: IRHG - Translation Request - With images this time! — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/04/20

Hi,
[#10994] Re: IRHG - Translation Request - With images this time! — Charles Thornton <ceo@...> 2007/04/21

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#10996] rdoc --diagram does not support new graphviz — "Pascal Terjan" <pterjan@...>

Hello,

3 messages 2007/04/21
[#10997] Re: rdoc --diagram does not support new graphviz — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2007/04/21

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
[#10999] Re : rdoc --diagram does not support new graphviz — "Pascal Terjan" <pterjan@...> 2007/04/21

2007/4/21, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <znmeb@cesmail.net>:

[#10998] rdoc --diagram does not support new graphviz — <noreply@...>

Patches item #10283, was opened at 21/04/2007 23:46

1 message 2007/04/21

[#11001] Fw: Object#method and super. Is this a bug? — Calamitas <calamitates@...>

Forwarding this here too. Note that 1.9 doesn't seem to exhibit the

1 message 2007/04/22

[#11002] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #10140, was opened at 2007-04-16 17:32

1 message 2007/04/23

[#11003] miniruby loads extensions from already installed ruby — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #10303, was opened at 2007-04-23 10:44

10 messages 2007/04/23
[#11007] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10303 ] miniruby loads extensions from already installed ruby — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/04/23

Hi,
[#11017] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10303 ] miniruby loads extensions from already installed ruby — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2007/04/24

Resending .. I hope it gets sent this time.
[#11020] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10303 ] miniruby loads extensions from already installed ruby — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2007/04/25

On 23/04/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#11033] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10303 ] miniruby loads extensions from already installed ruby — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/04/26

Hi,
[#11039] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10303 ] miniruby loads extensions from already installed ruby — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2007/04/26

On 26/04/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#11168] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10303 ] miniruby loads extensions from already installed ruby — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/05/15

Hi,
[#11198] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10303 ] miniruby loads extensions from already installed ruby — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2007/05/17

On 15/05/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#11201] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10303 ] miniruby loads extensions from already installed ruby — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/05/18

Hi,
[#11194] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10303 ] miniruby loads extensions from already installed ruby — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2007/05/17

On 15/05/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#11004] miniruby crashes on OS X — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #10304, was opened at 2007-04-23 10:55

1 message 2007/04/23

[#11005] BUGS in metaclasses inheritance — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #9462, was opened at 2007-03-22 11:19

1 message 2007/04/23

[#11010] miniruby crashes on OS X — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #10304, was opened at 2007-04-23 10:55

1 message 2007/04/23

[#11011] parallel assignment in Ruby 1.9 evaluates to true instead of array of rvalues — David Flanagan <david@...>

Bug or feature?

3 messages 2007/04/23
[#11014] Re: parallel assignment in Ruby 1.9 evaluates to true instead of array of rvalues — nobu@... 2007/04/24

Hi,
[#11015] Re: parallel assignment in Ruby 1.9 evaluates to true instead of array of rvalues — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/04/24

nobu@ruby-lang.org wrote:

[#11012] Ruby 1.9: multiple splats on rvalues in parallel assignment — David Flanagan <david@...>

This has got to be a bug...

4 messages 2007/04/23
[#11021] Re: Ruby 1.9: multiple splats on rvalues in parallel assignment — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/04/25

I've confirmed this bug against the current trunk:
[#11024] Re: Ruby 1.9: multiple splats on rvalues in parallel assignment — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/04/26

Hi,
[#11063] Re: Ruby 1.9: multiple splats on rvalues in parallel assignment — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2007/05/01

Hi,

[#11016] Error installing Ruby gem — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #10336, was opened at 2007-04-24 07:16

1 message 2007/04/24

[#11018] Net::HTTP encodes parameters improperly. — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #10340, was opened at 2007-04-24 15:49

1 message 2007/04/24

[#11019] miniruby crashes on OS X — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #10304, was opened at 2007-04-23 10:55

1 message 2007/04/25

[#11022] Process::GID#eid= and Process::UID#eid= aliases are defined improperly — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #10370, was opened at 2007-04-25 15:13

1 message 2007/04/25

[#11023] What does this error mean? — gga <ggarra@...>

I'm working on embedding ruby as a scripting language into a large

1 message 2007/04/26

[#11025] gsub with backslash characters in replacement string — "Adam Bozanich" <adam.boz@...>

Hello, spotted this one the other day:

10 messages 2007/04/26
[#11031] Re: [patch] gsub with backslash characters in replacement string — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/04/26

Hi,
[#11032] Re: [patch] gsub with backslash characters in replacement string — "Lyle Johnson" <lyle.johnson@...> 2007/04/26

On 4/26/07, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#11034] Re: [patch] gsub with backslash characters in replacement string — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/04/26

Hi,
[#11035] Re: [patch] gsub with backslash characters in replacement string — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2007/04/26

On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Lyle Johnson wrote:
[#11036] Re: [patch] gsub with backslash characters in replacement string — "Adam Bozanich" <adam.boz@...> 2007/04/26

On 4/26/07, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#11037] Re: [patch] gsub with backslash characters in replacement string — "Marte Raphael Y. Soliza" <myrtactle@...> 2007/04/26

On 4/26/07, Adam Bozanich <adam.boz@gmail.com> wrote:
[#11041] Re: [patch] gsub with backslash characters in replacement string — "Adam Bozanich" <adam.boz@...> 2007/04/26

On 4/26/07, Marte Raphael Y. Soliza <myrtactle@gmail.com > wrote:
[#11047] Re: [patch] gsub with backslash characters in replacement string — Roel Harbers <rubycore@...> 2007/04/27

Adam Bozanich wrote:
[#11072] Re: [patch] gsub with backslash characters in replacement string — "Jano Svitok" <jan.svitok@...> 2007/05/02

On 4/27/07, Roel Harbers <rubycore@roelharbers.com> wrote:

[#11026] Test::Unit::TestCase regression: register methods with arity == -1 — <noreply@...>

Patches item #10379, was opened at 2007-04-26 08:34

1 message 2007/04/26

[#11027] gsub with backslash characters in replacement string — <noreply@...>

Patches item #10380, was opened at 2007-04-26 08:37

1 message 2007/04/26

[#11028] Test::Unit::TestCase regression: register methods with arity == -1 — <noreply@...>

Patches item #10379, was opened at 2007-04-26 08:34

1 message 2007/04/26

[#11029] Proc#arity regression or bug in RDoc — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...>

5 messages 2007/04/26
[#11030] Re: [BUG] Proc#arity regression or bug in RDoc — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2007/04/26

On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 06:55:46PM +0900, Mauricio Fernandez wrote:
[#11046] Re: [BUG] Proc#arity regression or bug in RDoc — "Adam Bozanich" <adam.boz@...> 2007/04/27

On 4/26/07, Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@acm.org> wrote:
[#11059] Re: [patch] Re: [BUG] Proc#arity regression or bug in RDoc — "Adam Bozanich" <adam.boz@...> 2007/04/29

Cleaned it up a bit & added some tests to sample/test.rb. Not sure where
[#11064] Re: [patch] Re: [BUG] Proc#arity regression or bug in RDoc — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2007/05/01

Hi,

[#11042] IRHG - Heap Memory Compaction — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

Is the following explanation of why Memory Compaction issues are not

1 message 2007/04/26

[#11048] segmentation fault when executing ruby script — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #10402, was opened at 2007-04-27 10:58

1 message 2007/04/27

[#11049] No accept Ipv6 in IPAddr — "Cyril Mougel" <cyril.mougel@...>

Hi,

1 message 2007/04/27

[#11050] Question about Process::GID.switch — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>

Hi,

1 message 2007/04/27

[#11051] segmentation fault when executing ruby script — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #10402, was opened at 2007-04-27 01:58

1 message 2007/04/27

[#11052] Net::Http patch to support multiple parameters — "Scott Archer" <scott.archer@...>

This is a patch for the Net::Http client in ruby.

1 message 2007/04/27

[#11053] typo in lib/rexml/dtd/dtd.rb — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #10420, was opened at 2007-04-27 12:38

1 message 2007/04/27

[#11054] Stack problems with embedded ruby — gga <ggarra@...>

Okay, I did a little bit more digging into ruby's source code (both 1.8

1 message 2007/04/27

[#11055] exit from within block returns wrong value. — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #10428, was opened at 2007-04-28 04:53

1 message 2007/04/28

[#11056] exit from within block returns wrong value. — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #10428, was opened at 2007-04-27 22:53

1 message 2007/04/28

[#11057] exit from within block returns wrong value. — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #10428, was opened at 2007-04-28 04:53

1 message 2007/04/28

[#11058] Net::HTTP encodes parameters improperly. — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #10340, was opened at 2007-04-24 10:49

1 message 2007/04/28

[#11060] (1.9) Wrong arity of Procs obtained with somemethod.to_proc. — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...>

2 messages 2007/04/29
[#11065] Re: [BUG] (1.9) Wrong arity of Procs obtained with somemethod.to_proc. — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2007/05/01

Hi,

[#11061] (1.9) irb/completion — "Kent Sibilev" <ksruby@...>

Since in Ruby 1.9 Object.methods returns an array of symbols, the TAB

1 message 2007/04/29

[#11062] Net::HTTP encodes parameters improperly. — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #10340, was opened at 2007-04-24 15:49

1 message 2007/04/30

Re: Ruby 1.9/1.8 compatibility: String#lines

From: "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...>
Date: 2007-04-07 16:43:36 UTC
List: ruby-core #10893 
On 4/7/07, murphy <murphy@rubychan.de> wrote:
> > |It seems the most important change in 1.9, in terms of compatibility, is
> > |that String isn't Enumerable anymore. It breaks a lot of scripts on my
> > |system.
> >
> > I put "lines" before calling "each".
> Maybe I didn't explain my problem well enough, sorry. If I do this, my
> script can run with Ruby 1.9, sure.
>
> But Ruby 1.8 says:
>
>   undefined method `lines' for "Foo\nbar":String (NoMethodError)
>
> so it won't run under both versions.
>
> I feel that many people (me, for a start) will want to make their
> libraries available for both versions in the next 2 or 3 years, if not
> longer.

+1 on that.

Not leaving each in String, which leads to removing the include of
Enumerable seems unwise to me. Especially without a period of
deprecation.

What does it hurt?

Why introduce unecessary incompatibilities?

-- 
Rick DeNatale

My blog on Ruby
http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/

In This Thread

Prev Next