[#10830] New kill_thread function in eval.c conflict with a BeOS system function — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #9736, was opened at 01/04/2007 16:20
[#10834] Hefty patch for mkmf.rb — <noreply@...>
Patches item #9762, was opened at 2007-04-02 09:55
[#10853] Why limit class def to a constant or colon node? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
Is there a historical reason why I can't do something like these:
Hi,
On 4/3/07, Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@sun.com> wrote:
[#10867] defined? operator changed in ruby 1.9: bug or feature? — David Flanagan <david@...>
The behavior of the defined? operator is different in current ruby 1.9
Hi,
[#10875] Ruby shouldn't process shebang! — "Kirill A. Shutemov" <k.shutemov@...>
> echo -e '#!test\nputs "test passed"' | ruby=20
On 4/5/07, Kirill A. Shutemov <k.shutemov@gmail.com> wrote:
[#10884] Ruby 1.9/1.8 compatibility: String#lines — murphy <murphy@...>
It seems the most important change in 1.9, in terms of compatibility, is
[#10907] install (/bin/install) path hardcoded at build — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #10004, was opened at 2007-04-10 13:21
[#10909] Turning off verbose output for mkmf — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
[#10923] block_given? => true in main(). — "Adam Bozanich" <adam.boz@...>
Hi all.
[#10933] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #10140, was opened at 2007-04-16 17:32
Hi,
On 4/16/07, nobu@ruby-lang.org <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
On 4/19/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:> Hi,>> At Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:21:44 +0900,> Michal Suchanek wrote in [ruby-core:10960]:> > Yes. And this should also apply to extensions. The mkmf tests are now> > fine but the extension is linked with -L/sw/lib before -L../..>> Indeed.>>> Index: configure.in> ===================================================================> --- configure.in (revision 12191)> +++ configure.in (working copy)> @@ -1385,5 +1385,4 @@ if test "$enable_rpath" = yes; then> fi>> -LDFLAGS="-L. $LDFLAGS"> AC_SUBST(ARCHFILE)>This would break the previous fix so I did not even try to apply this ^
Hi,
[#10944] IRHG - "Three Stuffing" — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>
Can a japanese speaker give a translation
[#10947] backwards compatibility for 'raise Interrupt' — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
** BEFORE:
Hi,
Hi,
[#10968] IRHG - Manuscript Hunt — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>
Does anyone know of a Text Copy (Not PDF) of this manuscript:
[#10981] ruby 1.9 crash on cygwin — "Anton Ivanov" <Anton.Ivanov@...>
Hi,
[#11003] miniruby loads extensions from already installed ruby — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #10303, was opened at 2007-04-23 10:44
Hi,
On 23/04/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
On 26/04/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
[#11012] Ruby 1.9: multiple splats on rvalues in parallel assignment — David Flanagan <david@...>
This has got to be a bug...
[#11025] gsub with backslash characters in replacement string — "Adam Bozanich" <adam.boz@...>
Hello, spotted this one the other day:
Hi,
On 4/26/07, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
On 4/26/07, Adam Bozanich <adam.boz@gmail.com> wrote:
On 4/26/07, Marte Raphael Y. Soliza <myrtactle@gmail.com > wrote:
[#11029] Proc#arity regression or bug in RDoc — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...>
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 06:55:46PM +0900, Mauricio Fernandez wrote:
Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10140 ] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed
On 4/20/07, Michal Suchanek <hramrach@centrum.cz> wrote: > On 4/19/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > At Thu, 19 Apr 2007 22:30:47 +0900, > > Michal Suchanek wrote in [ruby-core:10970]: > > > This would break the previous fix so I did not even try to apply this ^ > > > > Sorry, mistaken. > > > > > This part looks good and it allows building ruby as long as the binary > > > extension dir is different. However, after changing config.guess to > > > report the same platform as the previous build I can no longer build > > > ruby. > > > > Why did you change config.guess? What do you mean by "the > > previous build"? > > > > > Apparently the dl extension uses the etc extension in some way, > > > I tried to rename ect to 0etc so that it is built first, and add > > > -I$(extout) to the miniruby command line but it still does not work: > > > > 'etc' is required via fileutils.rb and mkmf.rb. > > > > > ../../miniruby -I'../..' -I'../.././lib' -I../../.ext > > > ../.././ext/dl/mkcallback.rb > callback.func > > > /sw/lib/ruby/1.8/i686-darwin/etc.bundle: [BUG] Bus Error > > > ruby 1.8.6 (2007-03-13) [i686-darwin] > > > > Can't you show the backtrace if core exists? > > > For some reason the crash does not create a core. However, running > with the same arguments inside gdb gives tis backtrace: > hmm, it does not work with the new etc extension either. Only building full ruby and using that (with DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH) works. That is also what distribution patches use. (gdb) run -I'../..' -I'../.././lib' -I../../.ext -I../../.ext/i686-darwin ../.././ext/dl/mkcallback.rb The program being debugged has been started already. Start it from the beginning? (y or n) y Starting program: /sw/src/fink.build/ruby18-1.8.6-1/ruby-1.8.6/miniruby -I'../..' -I'../.././lib' -I../../.ext -I../../.ext/i686-darwin ../.././ext/dl/mkcallback.rb Reading symbols for shared libraries . done Program received signal EXC_BAD_ACCESS, Could not access memory. Reason: KERN_PROTECTION_FAILURE at address: 0x00000000 0x0057a662 in st_lookup (table=0x0, key=1949342, value=0xbfffd17c) at st.c:250 250 in st.c (gdb) bt #0 0x0057a662 in st_lookup (table=0x0, key=1949342, value=0xbfffd17c) at st.c:250 #1 0x00550c49 in rb_intern (name=0x1dbe9e "Etc") at parse.y:6023 #2 0x0050e801 in rb_define_module (name=0x1dbe9e "Etc") at class.c:305 #3 0x001db647 in Init_etc () at etc.c:506 #4 0x000841e5 in dln_load (file=0x48f8e0 "../../.ext/i686-darwin/etc.bundle") at dln.c:1476 #5 0x00018c76 in rb_require_safe (fname=3294280, safe=0) at eval.c:7222 #6 0x0000c458 in rb_call0 (klass=1944720, recv=3235220, id=9449, oid=9449, argc=1, argv=0xbfffd570, body=0x1cbd80, flags=2) at eval.c:5815 #7 0x0000cdb7 in rb_call (klass=1944720, recv=3235220, mid=9449, argc=1, argv=0xbfffd570, scope=1, self=3235220) at eval.c:6062 #8 0x0000a421 in rb_eval (self=3235220, n=0x0) at eval.c:3468 #9 0x000098b2 in rb_eval (self=3235220, n=0x0) at eval.c:3263 #10 0x00016a86 in module_setup (module=0, n=0x315dbc) at eval.c:4152 #11 0x0000bebc in rb_eval (self=1939860, n=0x0) at eval.c:4082 #12 0x000185c5 in rb_load (fname=3379620, wrap=0) at eval.c:6857 #13 0x00018c23 in rb_require_safe (fname=1869740, safe=0) at eval.c:7213 #14 0x0000c458 in rb_call0 (klass=1944720, recv=1939860, id=9449, oid=9449, argc=1, argv=0xbfffea80, body=0x1cbd80, flags=2) at eval.c:5815 #15 0x0000cdb7 in rb_call (klass=1944720, recv=1939860, mid=9449, argc=1, argv=0xbfffea80, scope=1, self=1939860) at eval.c:6062 #16 0x0000a421 in rb_eval (self=1939860, n=0x0) at eval.c:3468 #17 0x000185c5 in rb_load (fname=1870020, wrap=0) at eval.c:6857 #18 0x00018c23 in rb_require_safe (fname=1877520, safe=0) at eval.c:7213 #19 0x0000c458 in rb_call0 (klass=1944720, recv=1939860, id=9449, oid=9449, argc=1, argv=0xbffff110, body=0x1cbd80, flags=2) at eval.c:5815 #20 0x0000cdb7 in rb_call (klass=1944720, recv=1939860, mid=9449, argc=1, argv=0xbffff110, scope=1, self=1939860) at eval.c:6062 #21 0x0000a421 in rb_eval (self=1939860, n=0x0) at eval.c:3468 #22 0x00018f13 in ruby_exec_internal () at eval.c:1608 #23 0x00018f44 in ruby_exec () at eval.c:1628 #24 0x00018f6f in ruby_run () at eval.c:1638 #25 0x000024f3 in main (argc=6, argv=0xbffff520, envp=0xbffff53c) at main.c:48 Thanks Michal