[#10830] New kill_thread function in eval.c conflict with a BeOS system function — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #9736, was opened at 01/04/2007 16:20
[#10834] Hefty patch for mkmf.rb — <noreply@...>
Patches item #9762, was opened at 2007-04-02 09:55
[#10853] Why limit class def to a constant or colon node? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
Is there a historical reason why I can't do something like these:
Hi,
On 4/3/07, Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@sun.com> wrote:
[#10867] defined? operator changed in ruby 1.9: bug or feature? — David Flanagan <david@...>
The behavior of the defined? operator is different in current ruby 1.9
Hi,
[#10875] Ruby shouldn't process shebang! — "Kirill A. Shutemov" <k.shutemov@...>
> echo -e '#!test\nputs "test passed"' | ruby=20
On 4/5/07, Kirill A. Shutemov <k.shutemov@gmail.com> wrote:
[#10884] Ruby 1.9/1.8 compatibility: String#lines — murphy <murphy@...>
It seems the most important change in 1.9, in terms of compatibility, is
[#10907] install (/bin/install) path hardcoded at build — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #10004, was opened at 2007-04-10 13:21
[#10909] Turning off verbose output for mkmf — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
[#10923] block_given? => true in main(). — "Adam Bozanich" <adam.boz@...>
Hi all.
[#10933] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #10140, was opened at 2007-04-16 17:32
Hi,
On 4/16/07, nobu@ruby-lang.org <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
On 4/19/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:> Hi,>> At Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:21:44 +0900,> Michal Suchanek wrote in [ruby-core:10960]:> > Yes. And this should also apply to extensions. The mkmf tests are now> > fine but the extension is linked with -L/sw/lib before -L../..>> Indeed.>>> Index: configure.in> ===================================================================> --- configure.in (revision 12191)> +++ configure.in (working copy)> @@ -1385,5 +1385,4 @@ if test "$enable_rpath" = yes; then> fi>> -LDFLAGS="-L. $LDFLAGS"> AC_SUBST(ARCHFILE)>This would break the previous fix so I did not even try to apply this ^
Hi,
[#10944] IRHG - "Three Stuffing" — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>
Can a japanese speaker give a translation
[#10947] backwards compatibility for 'raise Interrupt' — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
** BEFORE:
Hi,
Hi,
[#10968] IRHG - Manuscript Hunt — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>
Does anyone know of a Text Copy (Not PDF) of this manuscript:
[#10981] ruby 1.9 crash on cygwin — "Anton Ivanov" <Anton.Ivanov@...>
Hi,
[#11003] miniruby loads extensions from already installed ruby — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #10303, was opened at 2007-04-23 10:44
Hi,
On 23/04/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
On 26/04/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
[#11012] Ruby 1.9: multiple splats on rvalues in parallel assignment — David Flanagan <david@...>
This has got to be a bug...
[#11025] gsub with backslash characters in replacement string — "Adam Bozanich" <adam.boz@...>
Hello, spotted this one the other day:
Hi,
On 4/26/07, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
On 4/26/07, Adam Bozanich <adam.boz@gmail.com> wrote:
On 4/26/07, Marte Raphael Y. Soliza <myrtactle@gmail.com > wrote:
[#11029] Proc#arity regression or bug in RDoc — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...>
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 06:55:46PM +0900, Mauricio Fernandez wrote:
[ ruby-Bugs-5995 ] OpenSSL::X509::Certificate.new is broken in the 1.8.5 libraries
Bugs item #5995, was opened at 2006-10-02 22:16 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=5995&group_id=426 Category: Standard Library Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: M B (mrbright) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: OpenSSL::X509::Certificate.new is broken in the 1.8.5 libraries Initial Comment: Applying the following code in the 1.8.4 instance works, however in the 1.8.5 instance it will fail with: Not enough data (CertificateError) error. out=<path to der file, or pem file> cert=OpenSSL::X509::Certificate.new(File.read(out)) if out && FileTest::file?(out) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Technorama Ltd. (technorama) Date: 2007-04-06 01:19 Message: It wouldn't suprise me if the change in behaviour is from a different openssl version. It would be very helpful to have some information on the certificate itself. Please post the results of the following command and the openssl version on each machine. openssl x509 -in cert.pem -noout -text If there is any information that you feel is confidential you can replace it with ***. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Technorama Ltd. (technorama) Date: 2007-04-05 22:46 Message: It wouldn't suprise me if the change in behaviour is from a different openssl version. It would be very helpful to have some information on the certificate itself. Please post the results of the following command and the openssl version on each machine. openssl x509 -in cert.pem -noout -text If there is any information that you feel is confidential you can replace it with ***. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Technorama Ltd. (technorama) Date: 2007-04-05 20:29 Message: How did you create the certificate? Did you set both not_before and not_after? Both fields are required by rfc2459. OpenSSL will allow you to create a bad X509 certificate and export it to DER/PEM. Trying to load it will throw an exception. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: M B (mrbright) Date: 2006-10-11 15:36 Message: Matz: I can tell you that I am running the above code on Linux ruby version 1.8.4 and then running the same file with the same certificate on windows 1.8.5. That seems to be all the information that I have. mrbright ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tom Copeland (tom) Date: 2006-10-11 03:33 Message: If you have a chance, please respond to Matz on ruby-core here: http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-core/9003 Thanks! tom ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=5995&group_id=426