[#10853] Why limit class def to a constant or colon node? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>

Is there a historical reason why I can't do something like these:

12 messages 2007/04/03

[#10933] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #10140, was opened at 2007-04-16 17:32

10 messages 2007/04/16
[#10934] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10140 ] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — nobu@... 2007/04/16

Hi,

[#10960] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10140 ] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2007/04/18

On 4/16/07, nobu@ruby-lang.org <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#10967] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10140 ] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/04/19

Hi,

[#10970] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10140 ] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2007/04/19

On 4/19/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:> Hi,>> At Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:21:44 +0900,> Michal Suchanek wrote in [ruby-core:10960]:> > Yes. And this should also apply to extensions. The mkmf tests are now> > fine but the extension is linked with -L/sw/lib before -L../..>> Indeed.>>> Index: configure.in> ===================================================================> --- configure.in (revision 12191)> +++ configure.in (working copy)> @@ -1385,5 +1385,4 @@ if test "$enable_rpath" = yes; then> fi>> -LDFLAGS="-L. $LDFLAGS"> AC_SUBST(ARCHFILE)>This would break the previous fix so I did not even try to apply this ^

[#11003] miniruby loads extensions from already installed ruby — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #10303, was opened at 2007-04-23 10:44

10 messages 2007/04/23

[#11025] gsub with backslash characters in replacement string — "Adam Bozanich" <adam.boz@...>

Hello, spotted this one the other day:

10 messages 2007/04/26

Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10140 ] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed

From: "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...>
Date: 2007-04-20 12:45:10 UTC
List: ruby-core #10988
On 4/19/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At Thu, 19 Apr 2007 22:30:47 +0900,
> Michal Suchanek wrote in [ruby-core:10970]:
> > This would break the previous fix so I did not even try to apply this ^
>
> Sorry, mistaken.
>
> > This part looks good and it allows building ruby as long as the binary
> > extension dir is different. However, after changing config.guess to
> > report the same platform as the previous build I can no longer build
> > ruby.
>
> Why did you change config.guess?  What do you mean by "the
> previous build"?
>
> > Apparently the dl extension uses the etc extension in some way,
> > I tried to rename ect to 0etc so that it is built first, and add
> > -I$(extout) to the miniruby command line but it still does not work:
>
> 'etc' is required via fileutils.rb and mkmf.rb.
>
> > ../../miniruby -I'../..' -I'../.././lib' -I../../.ext
> > ../.././ext/dl/mkcallback.rb > callback.func
> > /sw/lib/ruby/1.8/i686-darwin/etc.bundle: [BUG] Bus Error
> > ruby 1.8.6 (2007-03-13) [i686-darwin]
>
> Can't you show the backtrace if core exists?
>
For some reason the crash does not create a core. However, running
with the same arguments inside gdb gives tis backtrace:

(gdb) run -I'../..' -I'../.././lib' -I../../.ext ../.././ext/dl/mkcallback.rb
Starting program:
/sw/src/fink.build/ruby18-1.8.6-1/ruby-1.8.6/miniruby -I'../..'
-I'../.././lib' -I../../.ext ../.././ext/dl/mkcallback.rb
Reading symbols for shared libraries .. done

Program received signal EXC_BAD_ACCESS, Could not access memory.
Reason: KERN_PROTECTION_FAILURE at address: 0x00000000
0x0057a662 in st_lookup (table=0x0, key=1949342, value=0xbfffd1ac) at st.c:250
250     st.c: No such file or directory.
        in st.c
(gdb) bt
#0  0x0057a662 in st_lookup (table=0x0, key=1949342, value=0xbfffd1ac)
at st.c:250
#1  0x00550c49 in rb_intern (name=0x1dbe9e "Etc") at parse.y:6023
#2  0x0050e801 in rb_define_module (name=0x1dbe9e "Etc") at class.c:305
#3  0x001db62b in Init_etc () at etc.c:506
#4  0x000841e5 in dln_load (file=0x48f930
"/sw/lib/ruby/1.8/i686-darwin/etc.bundle") at dln.c:1476
#5  0x00018c76 in rb_require_safe (fname=3294300, safe=0) at eval.c:7222
#6  0x0000c458 in rb_call0 (klass=1944720, recv=3235240, id=9449,
oid=9449, argc=1, argv=0xbfffd5a0, body=0x1cbd80, flags=2) at
eval.c:5815
#7  0x0000cdb7 in rb_call (klass=1944720, recv=3235240, mid=9449,
argc=1, argv=0xbfffd5a0, scope=1, self=3235240) at eval.c:6062
#8  0x0000a421 in rb_eval (self=3235240, n=0x0) at eval.c:3468
#9  0x000098b2 in rb_eval (self=3235240, n=0x0) at eval.c:3263
#10 0x00016a86 in module_setup (module=0, n=0x315dd0) at eval.c:4152
#11 0x0000bebc in rb_eval (self=1939860, n=0x0) at eval.c:4082
#12 0x000185c5 in rb_load (fname=3379640, wrap=0) at eval.c:6857
#13 0x00018c23 in rb_require_safe (fname=1869760, safe=0) at eval.c:7213
#14 0x0000c458 in rb_call0 (klass=1944720, recv=1939860, id=9449,
oid=9449, argc=1, argv=0xbfffeab0, body=0x1cbd80, flags=2) at
eval.c:5815
#15 0x0000cdb7 in rb_call (klass=1944720, recv=1939860, mid=9449,
argc=1, argv=0xbfffeab0, scope=1, self=1939860) at eval.c:6062
#16 0x0000a421 in rb_eval (self=1939860, n=0x0) at eval.c:3468
#17 0x000185c5 in rb_load (fname=1870040, wrap=0) at eval.c:6857
#18 0x00018c23 in rb_require_safe (fname=1877540, safe=0) at eval.c:7213
#19 0x0000c458 in rb_call0 (klass=1944720, recv=1939860, id=9449,
oid=9449, argc=1, argv=0xbffff140, body=0x1cbd80, flags=2) at
eval.c:5815
#20 0x0000cdb7 in rb_call (klass=1944720, recv=1939860, mid=9449,
argc=1, argv=0xbffff140, scope=1, self=1939860) at eval.c:6062
#21 0x0000a421 in rb_eval (self=1939860, n=0x0) at eval.c:3468
#22 0x00018f13 in ruby_exec_internal () at eval.c:1608
#23 0x00018f44 in ruby_exec () at eval.c:1628
#24 0x00018f6f in ruby_run () at eval.c:1638
#25 0x000024f3 in main (argc=5, argv=0xbffff554, envp=0xbffff56c) at main.c:48


I am not sure this is of much use,though. It loads the already
installed etc extension which might be arbitrarily broken, and is out
of control of the build process.

Thanks

Michal

In This Thread