[#11073] segfault printing instruction sequence for iterator — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #10527, was opened at 2007-05-02 14:42

14 messages 2007/05/02
[#11142] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10527 ] segfault printing instruction sequence for iterator — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/05/10

Hi,

[#11188] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10527 ] segfault printing instruction sequence for iterator — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2007/05/16

On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 04:51:18PM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

[#11234] Planning to release 1.8.6 errata — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>

Hi all.

17 messages 2007/05/25

Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10303 ] miniruby loads extensions from already installed ruby

From: "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...>
Date: 2007-05-17 19:44:09 UTC
List: ruby-core #11198
On 15/05/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:30:31 +0900,
> Michal Suchanek wrote in [ruby-core:11039]:
> > As it turns out, ruby and miniruby only differ in the way
> > libruby-static is linked in. For miniruby it is linked directly by
> > full name, for ruby it is looked up with -l option.
> > So linking in another file would not fix the extensions for miniruby
> > nor prevent miniruby from loading potetntially broken and incompatible
> > extensions that are already installed. I think the object is present
> > in libruby anyway.
>
> Miniruby linked against dmydln.o is prevented from loading
> extensions at all.
>
> Anyway, isn't it solved by clearing default LOAD_PATH?
>

It looks good, I was able to build and run test. However, the runruby
I have is very different so I was not able to apply the changes. It
only affects the check target from the parts I usually try.

Thanks

Michal

In This Thread