[#10830] New kill_thread function in eval.c conflict with a BeOS system function — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #9736, was opened at 01/04/2007 16:20
[#10834] Hefty patch for mkmf.rb — <noreply@...>
Patches item #9762, was opened at 2007-04-02 09:55
[#10853] Why limit class def to a constant or colon node? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
Is there a historical reason why I can't do something like these:
Hi,
On 4/3/07, Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@sun.com> wrote:
[#10867] defined? operator changed in ruby 1.9: bug or feature? — David Flanagan <david@...>
The behavior of the defined? operator is different in current ruby 1.9
Hi,
[#10875] Ruby shouldn't process shebang! — "Kirill A. Shutemov" <k.shutemov@...>
> echo -e '#!test\nputs "test passed"' | ruby=20
On 4/5/07, Kirill A. Shutemov <k.shutemov@gmail.com> wrote:
[#10884] Ruby 1.9/1.8 compatibility: String#lines — murphy <murphy@...>
It seems the most important change in 1.9, in terms of compatibility, is
[#10907] install (/bin/install) path hardcoded at build — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #10004, was opened at 2007-04-10 13:21
[#10909] Turning off verbose output for mkmf — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
[#10923] block_given? => true in main(). — "Adam Bozanich" <adam.boz@...>
Hi all.
[#10933] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #10140, was opened at 2007-04-16 17:32
Hi,
On 4/16/07, nobu@ruby-lang.org <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
On 4/19/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:> Hi,>> At Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:21:44 +0900,> Michal Suchanek wrote in [ruby-core:10960]:> > Yes. And this should also apply to extensions. The mkmf tests are now> > fine but the extension is linked with -L/sw/lib before -L../..>> Indeed.>>> Index: configure.in> ===================================================================> --- configure.in (revision 12191)> +++ configure.in (working copy)> @@ -1385,5 +1385,4 @@ if test "$enable_rpath" = yes; then> fi>> -LDFLAGS="-L. $LDFLAGS"> AC_SUBST(ARCHFILE)>This would break the previous fix so I did not even try to apply this ^
Hi,
[#10944] IRHG - "Three Stuffing" — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>
Can a japanese speaker give a translation
[#10947] backwards compatibility for 'raise Interrupt' — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
** BEFORE:
Hi,
Hi,
[#10968] IRHG - Manuscript Hunt — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>
Does anyone know of a Text Copy (Not PDF) of this manuscript:
[#10981] ruby 1.9 crash on cygwin — "Anton Ivanov" <Anton.Ivanov@...>
Hi,
[#11003] miniruby loads extensions from already installed ruby — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #10303, was opened at 2007-04-23 10:44
Hi,
On 23/04/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
On 26/04/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
[#11012] Ruby 1.9: multiple splats on rvalues in parallel assignment — David Flanagan <david@...>
This has got to be a bug...
[#11025] gsub with backslash characters in replacement string — "Adam Bozanich" <adam.boz@...>
Hello, spotted this one the other day:
Hi,
On 4/26/07, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
On 4/26/07, Adam Bozanich <adam.boz@gmail.com> wrote:
On 4/26/07, Marte Raphael Y. Soliza <myrtactle@gmail.com > wrote:
[#11029] Proc#arity regression or bug in RDoc — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...>
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 06:55:46PM +0900, Mauricio Fernandez wrote:
Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10140 ] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed
On 4/19/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote: > Hi, > > At Thu, 19 Apr 2007 22:30:47 +0900, > Michal Suchanek wrote in [ruby-core:10970]: > > This would break the previous fix so I did not even try to apply this ^ > > Sorry, mistaken. > > > This part looks good and it allows building ruby as long as the binary > > extension dir is different. However, after changing config.guess to > > report the same platform as the previous build I can no longer build > > ruby. > > Why did you change config.guess? What do you mean by "the > previous build"? Because the default for OS X is to include the teeny OS version in the binary extension dir name. It is about as meaningful as i686-linux-2.6.19. Because of that I remove the version number so that I can rebuild ruby and keep the extensions. Of course, there are OS changes, even from application point of view. But I failed to find any correspondence between OS version number changes and OS interface changes so I just gave up. From my experience noticeable interface changes tend to correspond to some random teeny (or patchlevel) version number change while most teeny number changes bring no changes at all. Anyway, the interface changes usually apply things like cd burning software or other stuff that is tightly bound to the kernel and hardware. The previous build is the ruby 1.8.5 already installed in the system. > > > Apparently the dl extension uses the etc extension in some way, > > I tried to rename ect to 0etc so that it is built first, and add > > -I$(extout) to the miniruby command line but it still does not work: > > 'etc' is required via fileutils.rb and mkmf.rb. > > > ../../miniruby -I'../..' -I'../.././lib' -I../../.ext > > ../.././ext/dl/mkcallback.rb > callback.func > > /sw/lib/ruby/1.8/i686-darwin/etc.bundle: [BUG] Bus Error > > ruby 1.8.6 (2007-03-13) [i686-darwin] > > Can't you show the backtrace if core exists? I will try to find/create some. Thanks Michal