[#10853] Why limit class def to a constant or colon node? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>

Is there a historical reason why I can't do something like these:

12 messages 2007/04/03

[#10933] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #10140, was opened at 2007-04-16 17:32

10 messages 2007/04/16
[#10934] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10140 ] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — nobu@... 2007/04/16

Hi,

[#10960] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10140 ] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2007/04/18

On 4/16/07, nobu@ruby-lang.org <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#10967] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10140 ] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/04/19

Hi,

[#10970] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10140 ] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2007/04/19

On 4/19/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:> Hi,>> At Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:21:44 +0900,> Michal Suchanek wrote in [ruby-core:10960]:> > Yes. And this should also apply to extensions. The mkmf tests are now> > fine but the extension is linked with -L/sw/lib before -L../..>> Indeed.>>> Index: configure.in> ===================================================================> --- configure.in (revision 12191)> +++ configure.in (working copy)> @@ -1385,5 +1385,4 @@ if test "$enable_rpath" = yes; then> fi>> -LDFLAGS="-L. $LDFLAGS"> AC_SUBST(ARCHFILE)>This would break the previous fix so I did not even try to apply this ^

[#11003] miniruby loads extensions from already installed ruby — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #10303, was opened at 2007-04-23 10:44

10 messages 2007/04/23

[#11025] gsub with backslash characters in replacement string — "Adam Bozanich" <adam.boz@...>

Hello, spotted this one the other day:

10 messages 2007/04/26

[BUG] super reuses the variable holding the method id in method_missing

From: Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...>
Date: 2007-04-05 10:22:35 UTC
List: ruby-core #10874
I found this some time ago [ruby-talk:241088] but forgot to report it; it
might be related to Ara's [10851].

The problem seems to have been introduced somewhere between 1.8.4 and 1.8.5:

$ cat super_bug.rb 
def method_missing(m, *a, &b)
  m = :foo
  super
end
sdf 1, 2 do 1 end

$ ruby186 -v super_bug.rb 
ruby 1.8.6 (2007-03-13 patchlevel 0) [i686-linux]
super_bug.rb:3:in `method_missing': undefined method `foo' for main:Object (NoMethodError)
	from super_bug.rb:5
$ ruby185-p12 -v super_bug.rb 
ruby 1.8.5 (2006-12-25 patchlevel 12) [i686-linux]
super_bug.rb:3:in `method_missing': undefined method `foo' for main:Object (NoMethodError)
	from super_bug.rb:5
$ ruby -v super_bug.rb 
ruby 1.8.5 (2006-08-25) [i686-linux]
super_bug.rb:3:in `method_missing': undefined method `foo' for main:Object (NoMethodError)
	from super_bug.rb:5
$ ruby184 -v super_bug.rb 
ruby 1.8.4 (2005-12-24) [i686-linux]
super_bug.rb:3:in `method_missing': undefined method `sdf' for main:Object (NoMethodError)
	from super_bug.rb:5


-- 
Mauricio Fernandez  -   http://eigenclass.org   -  singular Ruby
                        ** Latest postings **
The Neo-Rails controversy and a language generator
  http://eigenclass.org/hiki/language-generator
Rails on 1.9: first benchmarks, YARV exposed to non-synthetic tests
  http://eigenclass.org/hiki/non-synthetic-benchmarks-for-yarv

In This Thread

Prev Next