[#10853] Why limit class def to a constant or colon node? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>

Is there a historical reason why I can't do something like these:

12 messages 2007/04/03

[#10933] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #10140, was opened at 2007-04-16 17:32

10 messages 2007/04/16
[#10934] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10140 ] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — nobu@... 2007/04/16

Hi,

[#10960] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10140 ] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2007/04/18

On 4/16/07, nobu@ruby-lang.org <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#10967] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10140 ] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/04/19

Hi,

[#10970] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10140 ] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2007/04/19

On 4/19/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:> Hi,>> At Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:21:44 +0900,> Michal Suchanek wrote in [ruby-core:10960]:> > Yes. And this should also apply to extensions. The mkmf tests are now> > fine but the extension is linked with -L/sw/lib before -L../..>> Indeed.>>> Index: configure.in> ===================================================================> --- configure.in (revision 12191)> +++ configure.in (working copy)> @@ -1385,5 +1385,4 @@ if test "$enable_rpath" = yes; then> fi>> -LDFLAGS="-L. $LDFLAGS"> AC_SUBST(ARCHFILE)>This would break the previous fix so I did not even try to apply this ^

[#11003] miniruby loads extensions from already installed ruby — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #10303, was opened at 2007-04-23 10:44

10 messages 2007/04/23

[#11025] gsub with backslash characters in replacement string — "Adam Bozanich" <adam.boz@...>

Hello, spotted this one the other day:

10 messages 2007/04/26

block_given? => true in main().

From: "Adam Bozanich" <adam.boz@...>
Date: 2007-04-16 07:26:03 UTC
List: ruby-core #10923
Hi all.

I'm trying to drive ruby from c ( eg, not call ruby_run() ).

I'm having problems with 1.9(trunk) because for some reason
rb_block_given_p() returns true all of the time, see the examples below.
The first one is a simple test, the next I tried to copy everything that
main,eval,ruby.c did before they start to use ruby classes ( i stopped when
rb_str_new() was used in proc_options() ).

I think there might be an initialization function that I'm not calling
because this does not happen in 1.8.6.  Any suggestions?

Thanks,
-Adam

#include "ruby.h"

int main( int argc , char * argv[] ) {
    RUBY_INIT_STACK;
    ruby_init();
    ruby_script("test");
    printf("block_given? => %s\n" , rb_block_given_p() ? "true" : "false" );
    return 0;
}

#include "ruby.h"
#include "eval_intern.h"

int main( int argc , char * argv[] ) {
    RUBY_INIT_STACK;
    ruby_init();

    int state;
    Init_stack((void*)&state);
    PUSH_THREAD_TAG();
    if((state = EXEC_TAG()) == 0 ) {
        ruby_script("test");

        /* rb_str_new() called from ruby.c:proc_options() */

        printf("block_given? => %s\n" , rb_block_given_p() ? "true" :
"false" );

    } else {
        printf("state != 0\n");
    }
    POP_THREAD_TAG();
    return 0;
}

In This Thread

Prev Next