[#10853] Why limit class def to a constant or colon node? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>

Is there a historical reason why I can't do something like these:

12 messages 2007/04/03

[#10933] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #10140, was opened at 2007-04-16 17:32

10 messages 2007/04/16
[#10934] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10140 ] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — nobu@... 2007/04/16

Hi,

[#10960] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10140 ] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2007/04/18

On 4/16/07, nobu@ruby-lang.org <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#10967] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10140 ] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/04/19

Hi,

[#10970] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10140 ] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2007/04/19

On 4/19/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:> Hi,>> At Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:21:44 +0900,> Michal Suchanek wrote in [ruby-core:10960]:> > Yes. And this should also apply to extensions. The mkmf tests are now> > fine but the extension is linked with -L/sw/lib before -L../..>> Indeed.>>> Index: configure.in> ===================================================================> --- configure.in (revision 12191)> +++ configure.in (working copy)> @@ -1385,5 +1385,4 @@ if test "$enable_rpath" = yes; then> fi>> -LDFLAGS="-L. $LDFLAGS"> AC_SUBST(ARCHFILE)>This would break the previous fix so I did not even try to apply this ^

[#11003] miniruby loads extensions from already installed ruby — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #10303, was opened at 2007-04-23 10:44

10 messages 2007/04/23

[#11025] gsub with backslash characters in replacement string — "Adam Bozanich" <adam.boz@...>

Hello, spotted this one the other day:

10 messages 2007/04/26

net/http bugs

From: "Mihai Danila" <viridium@...>
Date: 2007-04-03 19:39:43 UTC
List: ruby-core #10852
I noticed a while back a few limitations in the Ruby net/http library.

First, the implementation bluntly ignores a crucial part of the HTTP
protocol, that is, the fact that a parameter may appear multiple times in a
request string. Using a hash behind the scenes, keyed by parameter name,
Ruby in effect forces a single occurrence of any individual parameter. To
bypass, I had to do:

module Net
  class HTTP
    def HTTP.querystring(params, sep = '&')
      if params.keys.length > 0
        p = params.keys.sort.collect do |k|
          q = params[k].collect { |v| CGI.escape(k) + '=' + CGI.escape(v) }
          q = [ CGI.escape(k) + '=' ] if params[k] == ""
          q.join(sep)
        end
        p.join(sep)
      else
        nil
      end
    end
  end

  module HTTPHeader
    def set_form_data(params, sep = '&')
      self.body = Net::HTTP.querystring(params, sep)
      self.content_type = 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded'
    end
    alias form_data= set_form_data
  end
end

    # Client code.
    uri = URI.parse(server) + path
    http = Net::HTTP.new(uri.host, uri.port)
    uri = uri.to_s
    http.start do |http|
      http.read_timeout = @read_timeout
      if method == 'GET'
        if params.length > 0
          params = Net:: HTTP.querystring(params)
          uri = "#{uri}?#{params}"
        end
        q = Net::HTTP::Get.new(uri)
      else
        q = Net::HTTP::Post.new(uri)
        q.form_data = params
      end


Second, I had to overwrite HTTP.post_form_with_timeout for it to work
correctly. (I forget what the actual bug was, but while I'm at it)

module Net
  class HTTP
    def HTTP.post_form_with_timeout(url, params, read_timeout)
      req = Post.new(url.path)
      req.form_data = params
      req.basic_auth url.user, url.password if url.user
      new(url.host, url.port).start {|http|
        http.read_timeout = read_timeout
        http.request(req)
      }
    end
  end
end

What is the status of these issues?

I used ruby184-16p3.exe on WinXP.


Mihai

In This Thread

Prev Next