[#10853] Why limit class def to a constant or colon node? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>

Is there a historical reason why I can't do something like these:

12 messages 2007/04/03

[#10933] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #10140, was opened at 2007-04-16 17:32

10 messages 2007/04/16
[#10934] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10140 ] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — nobu@... 2007/04/16

Hi,

[#10960] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10140 ] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2007/04/18

On 4/16/07, nobu@ruby-lang.org <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#10967] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10140 ] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/04/19

Hi,

[#10970] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10140 ] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2007/04/19

On 4/19/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:> Hi,>> At Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:21:44 +0900,> Michal Suchanek wrote in [ruby-core:10960]:> > Yes. And this should also apply to extensions. The mkmf tests are now> > fine but the extension is linked with -L/sw/lib before -L../..>> Indeed.>>> Index: configure.in> ===================================================================> --- configure.in (revision 12191)> +++ configure.in (working copy)> @@ -1385,5 +1385,4 @@ if test "$enable_rpath" = yes; then> fi>> -LDFLAGS="-L. $LDFLAGS"> AC_SUBST(ARCHFILE)>This would break the previous fix so I did not even try to apply this ^

[#11003] miniruby loads extensions from already installed ruby — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #10303, was opened at 2007-04-23 10:44

10 messages 2007/04/23

[#11025] gsub with backslash characters in replacement string — "Adam Bozanich" <adam.boz@...>

Hello, spotted this one the other day:

10 messages 2007/04/26

[ ruby-Patches-10379 ] Test::Unit::TestCase regression: register methods with arity == -1

From: <noreply@...>
Date: 2007-04-26 08:34:25 UTC
List: ruby-core #11026
Patches item #10379, was opened at 2007-04-26 08:34
You can respond by visiting: 
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1700&aid=10379&group_id=426

Category: Ruby1.9
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Adam Bozanich (abozanich)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: Test::Unit::TestCase regression: register methods with arity == -1

Initial Comment:
Test::Unit::TestCase is skipping over methods defined as below.  It looks like procs/blocks with no arguments have an arity of -1

irb(main):001:0> proc { }.arity
=> -1
irb(main):002:0> proc {|| }.arity
=> -1

The patch is a simple copy & paste from the 1.8 sources.

<example>

require 'test/unit'

class Foo
    attr_reader :attrs
    def initialize
        @attrs = Hash.new
        ("A".."Z").each {  |x|  @attrs[x] = x.downcase }
    end
end

tclass = Class.new( Test::Unit::TestCase )
Foo.const_set "TestAttr" , tclass

Foo.new.attrs.each_pair do |key,value|
    tclass.class_eval do
        define_method("test_#{key}") do
            assert_equal(key,value.upcase)
        end
    end
end

</example>


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1700&aid=10379&group_id=426

In This Thread

Prev Next