[#10830] New kill_thread function in eval.c conflict with a BeOS system function — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #9736, was opened at 01/04/2007 16:20
[#10834] Hefty patch for mkmf.rb — <noreply@...>
Patches item #9762, was opened at 2007-04-02 09:55
[#10853] Why limit class def to a constant or colon node? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
Is there a historical reason why I can't do something like these:
Hi,
On 4/3/07, Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@sun.com> wrote:
[#10867] defined? operator changed in ruby 1.9: bug or feature? — David Flanagan <david@...>
The behavior of the defined? operator is different in current ruby 1.9
Hi,
[#10875] Ruby shouldn't process shebang! — "Kirill A. Shutemov" <k.shutemov@...>
> echo -e '#!test\nputs "test passed"' | ruby=20
On 4/5/07, Kirill A. Shutemov <k.shutemov@gmail.com> wrote:
[#10884] Ruby 1.9/1.8 compatibility: String#lines — murphy <murphy@...>
It seems the most important change in 1.9, in terms of compatibility, is
[#10907] install (/bin/install) path hardcoded at build — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #10004, was opened at 2007-04-10 13:21
[#10909] Turning off verbose output for mkmf — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
[#10923] block_given? => true in main(). — "Adam Bozanich" <adam.boz@...>
Hi all.
[#10933] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #10140, was opened at 2007-04-16 17:32
Hi,
On 4/16/07, nobu@ruby-lang.org <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
On 4/19/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:> Hi,>> At Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:21:44 +0900,> Michal Suchanek wrote in [ruby-core:10960]:> > Yes. And this should also apply to extensions. The mkmf tests are now> > fine but the extension is linked with -L/sw/lib before -L../..>> Indeed.>>> Index: configure.in> ===================================================================> --- configure.in (revision 12191)> +++ configure.in (working copy)> @@ -1385,5 +1385,4 @@ if test "$enable_rpath" = yes; then> fi>> -LDFLAGS="-L. $LDFLAGS"> AC_SUBST(ARCHFILE)>This would break the previous fix so I did not even try to apply this ^
Hi,
[#10944] IRHG - "Three Stuffing" — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>
Can a japanese speaker give a translation
[#10947] backwards compatibility for 'raise Interrupt' — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
** BEFORE:
Hi,
Hi,
[#10968] IRHG - Manuscript Hunt — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>
Does anyone know of a Text Copy (Not PDF) of this manuscript:
[#10981] ruby 1.9 crash on cygwin — "Anton Ivanov" <Anton.Ivanov@...>
Hi,
[#11003] miniruby loads extensions from already installed ruby — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #10303, was opened at 2007-04-23 10:44
Hi,
On 23/04/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
On 26/04/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
[#11012] Ruby 1.9: multiple splats on rvalues in parallel assignment — David Flanagan <david@...>
This has got to be a bug...
[#11025] gsub with backslash characters in replacement string — "Adam Bozanich" <adam.boz@...>
Hello, spotted this one the other day:
Hi,
On 4/26/07, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
On 4/26/07, Adam Bozanich <adam.boz@gmail.com> wrote:
On 4/26/07, Marte Raphael Y. Soliza <myrtactle@gmail.com > wrote:
[#11029] Proc#arity regression or bug in RDoc — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...>
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 06:55:46PM +0900, Mauricio Fernandez wrote:
[ ruby-Bugs-9462 ] BUGS in metaclasses inheritance
Bugs item #9462, was opened at 2007-03-22 11:19
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=9462&group_id=426
Category: Core
Group: 1.8.x
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Chauk-Mean P (chauk-mean)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: BUGS in metaclasses inheritance
Initial Comment:
The inheritance between metaclasses (noted between parentheses) should be as defined in the object.c source code (best seen with a fixed font) :
* +------------------+
* | |
* Object---->(Object) |
* ^ ^ ^ ^ |
* | | | | |
* | | +-----+ +---------+ |
* | | | | |
* | +-----------+ | |
* | | | | |
* +------+ | Module--->(Module) |
* | | ^ ^ |
* OtherClass-->(OtherClass) | | |
* | | |
* Class---->(Class) |
* ^ |
* | |
* +----------------+
*
The following code and output show that the actual inheritance between the metaclasses is incorrect :
def inspect_class name, obj
puts "#################"
puts "class : #{name} - id : #{obj.object_id}"
puts "superclass : #{obj.superclass.name } - id : #{obj.superclass.object_id}" if obj.superclass
puts "#################"
end
class OtherClass
end
class Object
inspect_class self.name, self
end
class << Object
inspect_class "(Object)", self
end
class Module
inspect_class self.name, self
end
class << Module
inspect_class "(Module)", self
end
class Class
inspect_class self.name, self
end
class << Class
inspect_class "(Class)", self
end
class OtherClass
inspect_class self.name, self
end
class << OtherClass
inspect_class "(OtherClass)", self
end
The output :
#################
class : Object - id : 22251190
#################
#################
class : (Object) - id : 22251160
superclass : Class - id : 22251170
#################
#################
class : Module - id : 22251180
superclass : Object - id : 22251190
#################
#################
class : (Module) - id : 22251150
superclass : Class - id : 22251170
#################
#################
class : Class - id : 22251170
superclass : Module - id : 22251180
#################
#################
class : (Class) - id : 22251140
superclass : - id : 22251140
#################
#################
class : OtherClass - id : 24175280
superclass : Object - id : 22251190
#################
#################
class : (OtherClass) - id : 24175220
superclass : - id : 22251140
#################
The bugs :
- The superclass of (OtherClass) is (Class) instead of (Object) !
- The superclass of (Class) is (Class) instead of (Module) !
- The superclass of (Module) is (Class) instead of (Object) !
Chauk-Mean.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Paolo Perrotta (paoloperrotta)
Date: 2007-04-23 14:14
Message:
I tried this:
class Object
# good old eigenclass accessor
def eigenclass; class << self; self; end; end
end
class A; end
class B < A; end
b = B.new
p "super of eigen of b: #{b.eigenclass.superclass}"
p "super of eigen of B: #{B.eigenclass.superclass}"
p "super of eigen of A: #{A.eigenclass.superclass}"
Ruby 1.8.2 and Ruby 1.9 give the same result (consistent with method lookup):
MacNusco:/usr/bin nusco$ ruby -v /strange.rb
ruby 1.8.2 (2004-12-25) [universal-darwin8.0]
"super of eigen of b: B"
"super of eigen of B: #<Class:A>"
"super of eigen of A: #<Class:Object>"
Ruby 1.8.5 and 1.8.6 seem to be bugged:
MacNusco:/ nusco$ ruby -v /strange.rb
ruby 1.8.6 (2007-03-13 patchlevel 0) [i686-darwin8.9.1]
"super of eigen of b: #<Class:B>"
"super of eigen of B: #<Class:Class>"
"super of eigen of A: #<Class:Class>"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=9462&group_id=426