[#390749] Why are there so many similar/identical methods in core classes — Kassym Dorsel <k.dorsel@...>

Let's look at the Array class and start with method aliases.

14 messages 2011/12/02

[#390755] Inverse Operation of Module#include — Su Zhang <su.comp.lang.ruby@...>

Hi list,

21 messages 2011/12/02
[#390759] Re: Inverse Operation of Module#include — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2011/12/02

[#390764] Re: Inverse Operation of Module#include — Isaac Sanders <isaacbfsanders@...> 2011/12/02

I would suggest an Adapter pattern use here. IF there is something that has

[#390876] black magical hash element vivification — Chad Perrin <code@...>

Ruby (1.9.3p0 to be precise, installed with RVM) is not behaving as I

12 messages 2011/12/05

[#390918] WEB SURVEY about Ruby Community — Intransition <transfire@...>

Did any one else get this survey request?

14 messages 2011/12/07

[#390976] Confusing results from string multiplication — Rob Marshall <robmarshall@...>

Hi,

19 messages 2011/12/08

[#391019] How can I do h["foo"] += "bar" if h["foo"] does not exist? — "Andrew S." <andrewinfosec@...>

Hi there,

13 messages 2011/12/09

[#391027] reading from file without end-of-lines — Janko Muzykant <umrzykus@...>

hi,

20 messages 2011/12/09
[#391028] Re: reading from file without end-of-lines — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2011/12/09

> i'm trying to read a few text values from single file:

[#391031] Re: reading from file without end-of-lines — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2011/12/09

On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@gmail.com> wrote:

[#391042] Re: reading from file without end-of-lines — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2011/12/09

On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Robert Klemme

[#391135] I need advice on what to do next. — Nathan Kossaeth <system_freak_2004@...>

I am new to programming. I read the ebook "Learn to Program" by Chris

23 messages 2011/12/12

[#391216] perf optimization using profile results — Chuck Remes <cremes.devlist@...>

I need some help with optimizing a set of libraries that I use. They are ffi-rzmq, zmqmachine and rzmq_brokers (all up on github).

13 messages 2011/12/13
[#391218] Re: perf optimization using profile results — Chuck Remes <cremes.devlist@...> 2011/12/13

On Dec 13, 2011, at 9:57 AM, Chuck Remes wrote:

[#391234] Re: perf optimization using profile results — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/12/14

A couple quick observations.

[#391238] Re: perf optimization using profile results — Chuck Remes <cremes.devlist@...> 2011/12/14

On Dec 13, 2011, at 7:03 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#391324] ruby 1.9 threading performance goes non-linear — Joel VanderWerf <joelvanderwerf@...>

12 messages 2011/12/16
[#391325] Re: ruby 1.9 threading performance goes non-linear — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/12/16

Joel VanderWerf <joelvanderwerf@gmail.com> wrote:

[#391420] Accessing class instance variables from an instance? — "Shareef J." <shareef@...>

Hi there,

26 messages 2011/12/20
[#391454] Re: Accessing class instance variables from an instance? — Khat Harr <myphatproxy@...> 2011/12/21

Actually, now that I'm thinking about it the existing behavior sort of

[#391456] Re: Accessing class instance variables from an instance? — Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@...> 2011/12/21

On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Khat Harr <myphatproxy@hotmail.com> wrote:

[#391545] Kernel#exit raises an exception? — Khat Harr <myphatproxy@...>

While I was working on embedding an interpreter I wrote a function to

13 messages 2011/12/24

[#391618] rvmsh: An easy installer for RVM — Bryan Dunsmore <dunsmoreb@...>

I have recently begun work on a project called [rvmsh]

12 messages 2011/12/29

[#391783] Mailspam — Gunther Diemant <g.diemant@...>

Is there a way to stop this mailspam of Luca (Mail)?

12 messages 2011/12/29

[#391790] What’s the standard way of implementing #hash for value objects in Ruby? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>

Hi!

23 messages 2011/12/29
[#391792] Re: What’s the standard way of implementing #hash for value objects in Ruby? — Gunther Diemant <g.diemant@...> 2011/12/29

I think you can't access instance variables from a class method, so

[#391793] Re: What’s the standard way of implementing #hash for value objects in Ruby? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2011/12/29

On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 15:52, Gunther Diemant <g.diemant@gmx.net> wrote:

[#391811] Re: What’s the standard way of implementing #hash for value objects in Ruby? — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2011/12/29

On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:

[#391812] Re: What’s the standard way of implementing #hash for value objects in Ruby? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2011/12/29

On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 00:26, Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> w=

[#391816] Re: What’s the standard way of implementing #hash for value objects in Ruby? — Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@...> 2011/12/30

On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:

[#391833] Re: What’s the standard way of implementing #hash for value objects in Ruby? — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2011/12/30

On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:

[ANN] nio4r 0.1.0: New IO for Ruby (Initial Christmas release!)

From: Tony Arcieri <tony.arcieri@...>
Date: 2011-12-26 01:34:13 UTC
List: ruby-talk #391567
Merry Christmas everyone! In the spirit of Matz's tradition of Christmas
releases I'm releasing a gem today: New IO for Ruby!

https://github.com/tarcieri/nio4r
http://rubygems.org/gems/nio4r

Around Christmastime some 4 years ago, I started working on a library
called Rev which I would later rename to Cool.io, an event framework for
Ruby. Unfortunately Cool.io largely lingered in obscurity. Fast-forward to
today, and I'm not so sure about "event frameworks" in general. I'd like to
go in a different direction. It's another Christmas and I'm releasing
another I/O gem :)

nio4r is not an event framework. Instead, it's more like a mostly drop-in
replacement for Kernel.select with significantly better performance and
without the arbitrary limitations. nio4r uses high performance system calls
like Linux's epoll and *BSD's kqueue which lets you monitor large numbers
(i.e. > 1024) of Ruby IO objects with significantly less CPU usage than
Kernel.select. The main difference between nio4r and Kernel.select is that
nio4r keeps track of IO objects you're interested in between select calls
(keeping the state in the kernel itself as possible). This lets you not
only monitor significantly more objects, but eliminates the costly setup
associated with building the interest sets for Kernel.select.

Unlike Cool.io, nio4r also works on JRuby, and ties into the Java NIO
subsystem. In fact, nio4r is largely modelled off of the Java NIO API. Two
other implementations of nio4r are provided: a C extension based on libev,
and a pure Ruby version for those Rubies that don't support the MRI C
extension API. nio4r's goal is to provide as good as possible performance
on all Ruby implementations.

What is the relationship between nio4r and Cool.io? There isn't a specific
one yet, however nio4r could be used to replace Cool.io's existing native
extension, and in doing so would provide a path to JRuby support. If
someone was feeling particularly adventurous, they could potentially
rewrite EventMachine with nio4r instead of the buggy, crufty, largely
unmaintained byzantine 10,000 line C++ native extension EventMachine ships
today.

--

Why nio4r? To a certain extent this is me wanting to scratch an itch I've
had for quite some time: providing a way to write evented code without a
large framework as a dependency. nio4r's primary goal is a high-performance
cross-Ruby implementation selector API for watching file descriptors and is
not intended to be an alternative to other Ruby IO enhancement projects
like Kinder Gentler IO (KGIO) which has mostly orthogonal goals.

My intended use case is bolstering the fledgling IO subsystem in my
concurrency library Celluloid. With nio4r as its underpinnings, Celluloid
should provide a great way to blend threaded and evented concepts. Every
Celluloid actor can function as a simplified "EventMachine", and as
Celluloid already wraps all events in fibers instead of exposing
callback-driven APIs, it should feel as simple and natural as using threads
+ blocking IO with significantly better performance.

My real hope is that Ruby implementers can help shape nio4r, ironing out
the kinks, then providing their own platform-native implementations that
can leverage better internal integration for more performance. Perhaps
nio4r could even be a standard API in Ruby 2.0.

More information on Celluloid:
https://github.com/tarcieri/celluloid

My Twitter:
http://twitter.com/bascule

-- 
Tony Arcieri

In This Thread

Prev Next