[#390749] Why are there so many similar/identical methods in core classes — Kassym Dorsel <k.dorsel@...>

Let's look at the Array class and start with method aliases.

14 messages 2011/12/02

[#390755] Inverse Operation of Module#include — Su Zhang <su.comp.lang.ruby@...>

Hi list,

21 messages 2011/12/02
[#390759] Re: Inverse Operation of Module#include — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2011/12/02

[#390764] Re: Inverse Operation of Module#include — Isaac Sanders <isaacbfsanders@...> 2011/12/02

I would suggest an Adapter pattern use here. IF there is something that has

[#390876] black magical hash element vivification — Chad Perrin <code@...>

Ruby (1.9.3p0 to be precise, installed with RVM) is not behaving as I

12 messages 2011/12/05

[#390918] WEB SURVEY about Ruby Community — Intransition <transfire@...>

Did any one else get this survey request?

14 messages 2011/12/07

[#390976] Confusing results from string multiplication — Rob Marshall <robmarshall@...>

Hi,

19 messages 2011/12/08

[#391019] How can I do h["foo"] += "bar" if h["foo"] does not exist? — "Andrew S." <andrewinfosec@...>

Hi there,

13 messages 2011/12/09

[#391027] reading from file without end-of-lines — Janko Muzykant <umrzykus@...>

hi,

20 messages 2011/12/09
[#391028] Re: reading from file without end-of-lines — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2011/12/09

> i'm trying to read a few text values from single file:

[#391031] Re: reading from file without end-of-lines — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2011/12/09

On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@gmail.com> wrote:

[#391042] Re: reading from file without end-of-lines — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2011/12/09

On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Robert Klemme

[#391135] I need advice on what to do next. — Nathan Kossaeth <system_freak_2004@...>

I am new to programming. I read the ebook "Learn to Program" by Chris

23 messages 2011/12/12

[#391216] perf optimization using profile results — Chuck Remes <cremes.devlist@...>

I need some help with optimizing a set of libraries that I use. They are ffi-rzmq, zmqmachine and rzmq_brokers (all up on github).

13 messages 2011/12/13
[#391218] Re: perf optimization using profile results — Chuck Remes <cremes.devlist@...> 2011/12/13

On Dec 13, 2011, at 9:57 AM, Chuck Remes wrote:

[#391234] Re: perf optimization using profile results — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/12/14

A couple quick observations.

[#391238] Re: perf optimization using profile results — Chuck Remes <cremes.devlist@...> 2011/12/14

On Dec 13, 2011, at 7:03 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#391324] ruby 1.9 threading performance goes non-linear — Joel VanderWerf <joelvanderwerf@...>

12 messages 2011/12/16
[#391325] Re: ruby 1.9 threading performance goes non-linear — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/12/16

Joel VanderWerf <joelvanderwerf@gmail.com> wrote:

[#391420] Accessing class instance variables from an instance? — "Shareef J." <shareef@...>

Hi there,

26 messages 2011/12/20
[#391454] Re: Accessing class instance variables from an instance? — Khat Harr <myphatproxy@...> 2011/12/21

Actually, now that I'm thinking about it the existing behavior sort of

[#391456] Re: Accessing class instance variables from an instance? — Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@...> 2011/12/21

On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Khat Harr <myphatproxy@hotmail.com> wrote:

[#391545] Kernel#exit raises an exception? — Khat Harr <myphatproxy@...>

While I was working on embedding an interpreter I wrote a function to

13 messages 2011/12/24

[#391618] rvmsh: An easy installer for RVM — Bryan Dunsmore <dunsmoreb@...>

I have recently begun work on a project called [rvmsh]

12 messages 2011/12/29

[#391783] Mailspam — Gunther Diemant <g.diemant@...>

Is there a way to stop this mailspam of Luca (Mail)?

12 messages 2011/12/29

[#391790] What’s the standard way of implementing #hash for value objects in Ruby? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>

Hi!

23 messages 2011/12/29
[#391792] Re: What’s the standard way of implementing #hash for value objects in Ruby? — Gunther Diemant <g.diemant@...> 2011/12/29

I think you can't access instance variables from a class method, so

[#391793] Re: What’s the standard way of implementing #hash for value objects in Ruby? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2011/12/29

On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 15:52, Gunther Diemant <g.diemant@gmx.net> wrote:

[#391811] Re: What’s the standard way of implementing #hash for value objects in Ruby? — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2011/12/29

On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:

[#391812] Re: What’s the standard way of implementing #hash for value objects in Ruby? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2011/12/29

On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 00:26, Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> w=

[#391816] Re: What’s the standard way of implementing #hash for value objects in Ruby? — Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@...> 2011/12/30

On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:

[#391833] Re: What’s the standard way of implementing #hash for value objects in Ruby? — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2011/12/30

On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:

Re: Koans: About_Regexp Question

From: Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...>
Date: 2011-12-23 09:39:58 UTC
List: ruby-talk #391538
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Russell Whittington
<russell.whittington@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As the title implies, I'm pretty new to Ruby (and programming) and I've
> got a question regarding regular expressions in the above Koans
> exercises, specifically with the "sub" and "gsub" methods.
>
> What I would like to know is: is my thinking correct here:
>
> def test_sub_is_like_find_and_replace
> =A0 =A0assert_equal ["one t-three"], "one two-three".sub(/(t\w*)/) { $1[0=
,
> 1] }
> =A0end
>
> So, as I see it, the "sub" method is looking for the first "t" in the
> string. The hash says that it will replace [0, 1] elements of the string
> following the "t" ("w" and "o" respectively) with "$1", which has not
> been defined, meaning it will take these letters out of the string.
>
> The gsub exercise is the same code, but with gsub instead of sub, so in
> that instance it looks to find and replace the [0, 1] elements following
> *every* "t" in the string.
>
> I think I'm way off base here, but any advice you can lend me will be
> greatly appreciated.

Actually not: your interpretation leads to the correct result although
you are a bit off in some details:

- What you see at the end of the line is not a Hash but a block passed
to the method call #sub.

- The block comes only into play when matching has finished (see below).

- Matching does not look for the first "t" _only_, instead it will
match the first "t" followed by as much "word" characters as possible
(this is what the "\w*" is for).

- $1 *is* defined, actually the value in $1 is a side effect of the
matching which takes place in #sub.

- $1 is filled from everything which is matched by the first capturing
group in the regexp (there is also $2, $3 etc.); capturing groups are
denoted by "(...)" and there are also non capturing groups denoted by
"(?:...)" and a few other variants: in this case the capturing group
happens to span the whole expression, which is a deprecated case
because usually you use capturing groups to extract _parts_ from a
match. For the whole expression there is $& already - and in the case
of #sub, #gsub and #scan it's also stored in the block argument.

- The expression $1[0,1] denotes the part of $1 which is used for the
replacement (literally the first character).  You can as well use
$1[0] here.

- Basically using $1 in the block is superfluous here since you know
the first character is always "t", so you can use it literally.

In IRB

irb(main):006:0> "one two-three".sub(/(t\w*)/) { $1[0,1] }
=3D> "one t-three"
irb(main):007:0> "one two-three".sub(/(t\w*)/) { $1[0] }
=3D> "one t-three"
irb(main):008:0> "one two-three".sub(/(t\w*)/) { 't' }
=3D> "one t-three"
irb(main):009:0> "one two-three".sub(/t\w*/) { 't' }

irb(main):017:0> "one two-three".sub(/t\w*/) {|m| m[0,1] }
=3D> "one t-three"
irb(main):018:0> "one two-three".sub(/t\w*/) {|m| m[0] }
=3D> "one t-three"

Other simplifications:

irb(main):010:0> "one two-three".sub(/(t)\w*/) { $1 }
=3D> "one t-three"
irb(main):011:0> "one two-three".sub(/(?<=3Dt)\w*/) { '' }
=3D> "one t-three"
irb(main):012:0> "one two-three".sub(/(?<=3Dt)\w*/, '')
=3D> "one t-three"

11 and 12 work with lookbehind.  Lookbehind and -ahead ensure
something is there but do not include it in the match.  So in this
case we replace sequences of any word characters of arbitrary length
with the empty string, effectively removing it.

You can even use String#[]=3D to immediately assign.

irb(main):014:0> s =3D "one two-three"
=3D> "one two-three"
irb(main):015:0> s[/(?<=3Dt)\w*/]=3D''
=3D> ""
irb(main):016:0> s
=3D> "one t-three"

etc.

Kind regards

robert

--=20
remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end
http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/

In This Thread