From: Intransition <transfire@...>
Date: 2011-12-08T03:56:44+09:00
Subject: Re: WEB SURVEY about Ruby Community

------=_Part_662_24848160.1323284201831
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_663_9455258.1323284201831"

------=_Part_663_9455258.1323284201831
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



On Wednesday, December 7, 2011 1:16:07 PM UTC-5, Quintus wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07.12.2011 15:08, Peter Zotov wrote:
> > Adam Prescott =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB 07.12.2011 18:05:
> >> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 14:02, Josh Cheek <josh....@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>=20
> >>> I didn't, maybe it's being marked as spam?
> >>>=20
> >>=20
> >> I got one, but the email itself says that only a sample of the
> >> mailing list users received the email. The survey talks about
> >> developing Ruby itself, it seems, but I guess it's likely from
> >> ruby-talk not ruby-core.
> >=20
> > Yes, it's from ruby-talk, and I wrote the author about the
> > (possible) misunderstanding. It seems like a terminology clash,
> > i.e. he has actually meant "Ruby community" instead of "project",
> > or something like that. I'm not sure through.
> >=20
>
> I got this mail as well, but didn't had yet time to do any survey. Is
> it worth looking into or shall I rather ignore the mail?
>
> I suspect it's from ruby-talk as I'm not subscribed to the ruby-core ML
>

It seems okay. Some of the questions seem a bit odd, which is why I wanted=
=20
to make sure it was for real.

I wonder if matz knows about it.



------=_Part_663_9455258.1323284201831
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<br><br>On Wednesday, December 7, 2011 1:16:07 PM UTC-5, Quintus wrote:<blo=
ckquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0;margin-left: 0.8ex;border-=
left: 1px #ccc solid;padding-left: 1ex;">-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----=
<br>Hash: SHA1<p>On 07.12.2011 15:08, Peter Zotov wrote:<br>&gt; Adam Presc=
ott =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB 07.12.2011 18:05:<br>&gt;&gt; On Wed, De=
c 7, 2011 at 14:02, Josh Cheek &lt;<a>josh....@gmail.com</a>&gt;<br>&gt;&gt=
; wrote:<br>&gt;&gt; <br>&gt;&gt;&gt; I didn't, maybe it's being marked as =
spam?<br>&gt;&gt;&gt; <br>&gt;&gt; <br>&gt;&gt; I got one, but the email it=
self says that only a sample of the<br>&gt;&gt; mailing list users received=
 the email. The survey talks about<br>&gt;&gt; developing Ruby itself, it s=
eems, but I guess it's likely from<br>&gt;&gt; ruby-talk not ruby-core.<br>=
&gt; <br>&gt; Yes, it's from ruby-talk, and I wrote the author about the<br=
>&gt; (possible) misunderstanding. It seems like a terminology clash,<br>&g=
t; i.e. he has actually meant "Ruby community" instead of "project",<br>&gt=
; or something like that. I'm not sure through.<br>&gt; </p><p>I got this m=
ail as well, but didn't had yet time to do any survey. Is<br>it worth looki=
ng into or shall I rather ignore the mail?</p><p>I suspect it's from ruby-t=
alk as I'm not subscribed to the ruby-core ML</p></blockquote><div><br></di=
v><div>It seems okay. Some of the questions seem a bit odd, which is why I =
wanted to make sure it was for real.</div><div><br></div><div>I wonder if m=
atz knows about it.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div>
------=_Part_663_9455258.1323284201831--

------=_Part_662_24848160.1323284201831--