[#390749] Why are there so many similar/identical methods in core classes — Kassym Dorsel <k.dorsel@...>

Let's look at the Array class and start with method aliases.

14 messages 2011/12/02

[#390755] Inverse Operation of Module#include — Su Zhang <su.comp.lang.ruby@...>

Hi list,

21 messages 2011/12/02
[#390759] Re: Inverse Operation of Module#include — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2011/12/02

[#390764] Re: Inverse Operation of Module#include — Isaac Sanders <isaacbfsanders@...> 2011/12/02

I would suggest an Adapter pattern use here. IF there is something that has

[#390876] black magical hash element vivification — Chad Perrin <code@...>

Ruby (1.9.3p0 to be precise, installed with RVM) is not behaving as I

12 messages 2011/12/05

[#390918] WEB SURVEY about Ruby Community — Intransition <transfire@...>

Did any one else get this survey request?

14 messages 2011/12/07

[#390976] Confusing results from string multiplication — Rob Marshall <robmarshall@...>

Hi,

19 messages 2011/12/08

[#391019] How can I do h["foo"] += "bar" if h["foo"] does not exist? — "Andrew S." <andrewinfosec@...>

Hi there,

13 messages 2011/12/09

[#391027] reading from file without end-of-lines — Janko Muzykant <umrzykus@...>

hi,

20 messages 2011/12/09
[#391028] Re: reading from file without end-of-lines — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2011/12/09

> i'm trying to read a few text values from single file:

[#391031] Re: reading from file without end-of-lines — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2011/12/09

On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@gmail.com> wrote:

[#391042] Re: reading from file without end-of-lines — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2011/12/09

On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Robert Klemme

[#391135] I need advice on what to do next. — Nathan Kossaeth <system_freak_2004@...>

I am new to programming. I read the ebook "Learn to Program" by Chris

23 messages 2011/12/12

[#391216] perf optimization using profile results — Chuck Remes <cremes.devlist@...>

I need some help with optimizing a set of libraries that I use. They are ffi-rzmq, zmqmachine and rzmq_brokers (all up on github).

13 messages 2011/12/13
[#391218] Re: perf optimization using profile results — Chuck Remes <cremes.devlist@...> 2011/12/13

On Dec 13, 2011, at 9:57 AM, Chuck Remes wrote:

[#391234] Re: perf optimization using profile results — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/12/14

A couple quick observations.

[#391238] Re: perf optimization using profile results — Chuck Remes <cremes.devlist@...> 2011/12/14

On Dec 13, 2011, at 7:03 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#391324] ruby 1.9 threading performance goes non-linear — Joel VanderWerf <joelvanderwerf@...>

12 messages 2011/12/16
[#391325] Re: ruby 1.9 threading performance goes non-linear — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/12/16

Joel VanderWerf <joelvanderwerf@gmail.com> wrote:

[#391420] Accessing class instance variables from an instance? — "Shareef J." <shareef@...>

Hi there,

26 messages 2011/12/20
[#391454] Re: Accessing class instance variables from an instance? — Khat Harr <myphatproxy@...> 2011/12/21

Actually, now that I'm thinking about it the existing behavior sort of

[#391456] Re: Accessing class instance variables from an instance? — Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@...> 2011/12/21

On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Khat Harr <myphatproxy@hotmail.com> wrote:

[#391545] Kernel#exit raises an exception? — Khat Harr <myphatproxy@...>

While I was working on embedding an interpreter I wrote a function to

13 messages 2011/12/24

[#391618] rvmsh: An easy installer for RVM — Bryan Dunsmore <dunsmoreb@...>

I have recently begun work on a project called [rvmsh]

12 messages 2011/12/29

[#391783] Mailspam — Gunther Diemant <g.diemant@...>

Is there a way to stop this mailspam of Luca (Mail)?

12 messages 2011/12/29

[#391790] What’s the standard way of implementing #hash for value objects in Ruby? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>

Hi!

23 messages 2011/12/29
[#391792] Re: What’s the standard way of implementing #hash for value objects in Ruby? — Gunther Diemant <g.diemant@...> 2011/12/29

I think you can't access instance variables from a class method, so

[#391793] Re: What’s the standard way of implementing #hash for value objects in Ruby? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2011/12/29

On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 15:52, Gunther Diemant <g.diemant@gmx.net> wrote:

[#391811] Re: What’s the standard way of implementing #hash for value objects in Ruby? — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2011/12/29

On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:

[#391812] Re: What’s the standard way of implementing #hash for value objects in Ruby? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2011/12/29

On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 00:26, Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> w=

[#391816] Re: What’s the standard way of implementing #hash for value objects in Ruby? — Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@...> 2011/12/30

On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:

[#391833] Re: What’s the standard way of implementing #hash for value objects in Ruby? — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2011/12/30

On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:

Re: Understanding array.clear

From: Sam Duncan <sduncan@...>
Date: 2011-12-19 20:11:05 UTC
List: ruby-talk #391405
On 20/12/11 08:48, Nick Sandberg wrote:
> I was working a project Euler problem and noticed that when I used this
> code:
>
> array1 = ["a", "b", "c", "d", "e"]
> array2 = Array.new
> array2<<  array1
> array1.clear
> p array2
>
> [[]] is my output. But, when I tried:
>
> array1 = ["a", "b", "c", "d", "e"]
> array2 = Array.new
> array2<<  array1
> array1 = []
> p array2
>
> [["a", "b", "c", "d", "e"]] is my output.  I am not understanding why
> clearing array1 is changing array2, but replacing the value of array1 is
> having no effect.
>
> (btw, using ruby 1.9.2p180)
>
So what is happening can be seen by inspecting object ids. In the first 
instance we create two new arrays which are referenced by variables 
array1 and array2 respectively.

1.9.2p290 :001 > array1 = ["a", "b", "c", "d", "e"]
  => ["a", "b", "c", "d", "e"]
1.9.2p290 :002 > array1.object_id
  => 4320500
1.9.2p290 :003 > array2 = Array.new
  => []
1.9.2p290 :004 > array2.object_id
  => 4205400

We then add the array which is referenced by array1 as the first element 
of array2

1.9.2p290 :005 > array2 << array1
  => [["a", "b", "c", "d", "e"]]
1.9.2p290 :006 > array2.first.object_id == array1.object_id
  => true

So in fact array2 now contains a reference to array1. This then does 
what we expect when the array referenced by array1 is cleared. You will 
notice the object reference remains the same.

1.9.2p290 :007 > array1.clear
  => []
1.9.2p290 :008 > array2
  => [[]]
1.9.2p290 :009 > array2.first.object_id == array1.object_id
  => true

Now what happens if we do the same thing, except instead of clearing the 
array referenced by array1, we assign a new array to array1.

  1.9.2p290 :010 > array1 = ["a", "b", "c", "d", "e"]
  => ["a", "b", "c", "d", "e"]
1.9.2p290 :011 > array1.object_id
  => 5232600
1.9.2p290 :012 > array2 = Array.new
  => []
1.9.2p290 :013 > array2.object_id
  => 5189800
1.9.2p290 :014 > array2 << array1
  => [["a", "b", "c", "d", "e"]]
1.9.2p290 :015 > array2.first.object_id == array1.object_id
  => true
1.9.2p290 :016 > array1 = Array.new
  => []
1.9.2p290 :017 > array2.first.object_id == array1.object_id
  => false
1.9.2p290 :018 > array2
  => [["a", "b", "c", "d", "e"]]

As you can see here, when array1 is told to reference a new array, the 
array it used to reference is still intact and remains in existence due 
to array2 still holding a reference to it. The variable array1 now 
points to a shiny new array and thus methods called via array1 are no 
longer received by the one we shoved into array2.

1.9.2p290 :019 > array1.object_id
  => 5144400
1.9.2p290 :020 > array2.object_id
  => 5189800
1.9.2p290 :021 > array2.first.object_id
  => 5232600

Does that help?

Sam


In This Thread