From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2000-05-22T22:52:04+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:02930] Re: Found another /p

Hi,

In message "[ruby-talk:02929] Re: Found another /p"
    on 00/05/22, Minero Aoki <aamine@dp.u-netsurf.ne.jp> writes:

|  In mail "[ruby-talk:02917] Found another /p"
|    Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> wrote:
|
|> lib/net/http.rb: line 489
|> 
|> I think it can be safely changed to a /m
|
|I'll change it not to use both 'p' and 'm'.

Thank you.

BTW, in latest CVS commit, /p was back (with warning).

Last significant change:

  * both /p and /m are available
  * Regexp call `initialize'
  * IO/File/Dir: `new' does not take block, `open' does.
  * IO::popen: subprocess is terminated after block execution
  + change `rescue .. in ..' into `rescue .. => ..' (experimental)

Things to do:

  * provide better name for `iterator?'.
  * extension may be put in subdirectory, e.g. dbm/gdbm

							matz.