[#3006] mismatched quotation — "stevan apter" <apter@...>

ruby documentation uses a punctuation convention i've never seen

13 messages 2000/05/27

[ruby-talk:02649] Re: Ruby Toplevel

From: Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
Date: 2000-05-09 05:46:53 UTC
List: ruby-talk #2649
matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:

> Hi,
> 
> In message "[ruby-talk:02647] Re: Ruby Toplevel"
>     on 00/05/09, Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> writes:
> 
> |True enough. What I'm trying to illustrate though is how that binding
> |gets set up. It would be nice to be able to say something like:
> 
> Bindings can only be used for the optional second argument of eval().

Agreed, but using a binding is cheating, because I wanted to show the
readers how the binding came into existence--what the interpreter does 
to establish it.

In the end, it's not too important (I hope). I think I can just
explain it all in words.


Thanks


Dave

In This Thread

Prev Next