[#3006] mismatched quotation — "stevan apter" <apter@...>

ruby documentation uses a punctuation convention i've never seen

13 messages 2000/05/27

[ruby-talk:02631] Re: Requiring more flexible require

From: Masaki Fukushima <fukusima@...>
Date: 2000-05-08 11:37:52 UTC
List: ruby-talk #2631
Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@cinnober.com> wrote:
> Normally there's no need to access foo_wrap shared object. But now I got
> another idea and the question remains, could there be a use for wrapped
> libraries?
> 
> Can you imagine program barrel.c using some routines from foo_wrap.c
> directly? Or how about embedded Ruby programs? Could they possess some need
> to 'ld -lfoo_wrap'?

foo_wrap.c contains only wrapper code.  Wrapper code is almost
useless without Ruby interpreter.  So I can imagine no barrel.c.

I agree wrapped libraries are useful for embedded Ruby programs.


Masaki Fukushima

In This Thread

Prev Next