[#2617] irb for 1.5.x — Andrew Hunt <Andy@...>
5 messages
2000/05/03
[#2639] OT: Japanese names — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
4 messages
2000/05/09
[#2643] Ruby Toplevel — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
7 messages
2000/05/09
[#2656] Re: Append alias for Array.append? — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
Hideto ISHIBASHI:
5 messages
2000/05/09
[#2660] win OLE / eRuby — Andrew Hunt <Andy@...>
8 messages
2000/05/09
[#2663] Re: win OLE / eRuby — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
>At Tue, 9 May 2000 09:14:51 -0400,
4 messages
2000/05/09
[#2667] The reference manual is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
6 messages
2000/05/09
[#2668] Re: The reference manual is now online — schneik@...
4 messages
2000/05/09
[#2702] Re: Append alias for Array.append? — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>
>From: Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@cinnober.com>
7 messages
2000/05/10
[#2752] RE: Array.pop and documentation [was: Append al ias for Array.append?] — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
6 messages
2000/05/11
[#2758] Re: irb install — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>
>|Excellent! Will you consider adding mod_ruby to install_app as
7 messages
2000/05/11
[#2777] Re: irb install
— "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...>
2000/05/12
Hi,
[#2764] More code browsing questions — Albert Wagner <alwagner@...>
I see some class definitions contain "include" and "extend" statements.
6 messages
2000/05/12
[#2843] Re: editors for ruby — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>
(Posted on comp.lang.ruby and ruby-talk ML.)
6 messages
2000/05/17
[#2874] RE: simple httpd for local use — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
> I personally use it for access to full-text indexed linux
6 messages
2000/05/18
[#2875] Re: simple httpd for local use
— hipster <hipster@...4all.nl>
2000/05/18
On Thu, 18 May 2000 09:10:28 +0200, Aleksi Niemelwrote:
[#2920] SWIG: virtual variable? — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...>
hello,
4 messages
2000/05/22
[#2928] FYI: What our Python friends are up to. — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>
Hi,
8 messages
2000/05/22
[#2964] Thank you — h.fulton@...
Thanks, Matz (and others) for your replies to
4 messages
2000/05/24
[#2973] Re: Socket.getnameinfo — ts <decoux@...>
>>>>> "D" == Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> writes:
10 messages
2000/05/25
[#3016] rbconfig.rb — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
5 messages
2000/05/28
[#3039] Re: Final for World Series: Python vs Ruby — "Dat Nguyen" <thucdat@...>
1 message
2000/05/30
[#3058] FailureClass? — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
Question arising from the FAQ:
7 messages
2000/05/31
[ruby-talk:02726] Re: Append alias for Array.append?
From:
"Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>
Date:
2000-05-11 03:36:06 UTC
List:
ruby-talk #2726
Hi, From: Hideto ISHIBASHI # Here's another proposal to this: # From: Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@cinnober.com> # > >I don't know whether Array should has the `append' method. # > >BTW, what is the opposite of `append?' # > >Array.push <---> Array.append # > >Array.pop <---> Array.??? # # > Maybe there should be some Array.remove_from_end but there's two different # > view points here. # # > Well, the opposite of Array.append would be Array.prepend, just an different # > axis :). # # I'd add Array.shrink. But some native English speakers might think # this as not a better name... The problem is that shrink is ambiguous about which direction/side the shrinking would occur from. # Now that prepend seems good, I can't find the word `prepend' # in my English dictionary, however. Do you guys really use this # word in your daily life or in technical talks? Yes, at least for computer-related discussions. Try www.dictionary.com. Being an online dictionary with access to lots of cheap storage and being a competitive marketing front-end of sorts, it is probably more comprehensive and more up to date than your dictionary, although it doesn't compare to the giant OED (Oxford English Dictionary). It has the common definition for "prepend". It says that "prepend" is jargon, but I think that is a little misleading because that is sort of like saying that "program" is jargon. Both terms are fairly widely known and used these days, although "program" is much more frequently used. It doesn't have "rubyholic" yet. This is probably because not enough people are using comp.lang.ruby, so this term hasn't been swept up by the latest generation of electronic concordance generators and analyzers. Conrad