[#2617] irb for 1.5.x — Andrew Hunt <Andy@...>
5 messages
2000/05/03
[#2639] OT: Japanese names — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
4 messages
2000/05/09
[#2643] Ruby Toplevel — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
7 messages
2000/05/09
[#2656] Re: Append alias for Array.append? — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
Hideto ISHIBASHI:
5 messages
2000/05/09
[#2660] win OLE / eRuby — Andrew Hunt <Andy@...>
8 messages
2000/05/09
[#2663] Re: win OLE / eRuby — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
>At Tue, 9 May 2000 09:14:51 -0400,
4 messages
2000/05/09
[#2667] The reference manual is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
6 messages
2000/05/09
[#2668] Re: The reference manual is now online — schneik@...
4 messages
2000/05/09
[#2702] Re: Append alias for Array.append? — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>
>From: Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@cinnober.com>
7 messages
2000/05/10
[#2752] RE: Array.pop and documentation [was: Append al ias for Array.append?] — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
6 messages
2000/05/11
[#2758] Re: irb install — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>
>|Excellent! Will you consider adding mod_ruby to install_app as
7 messages
2000/05/11
[#2777] Re: irb install
— "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...>
2000/05/12
Hi,
[#2764] More code browsing questions — Albert Wagner <alwagner@...>
I see some class definitions contain "include" and "extend" statements.
6 messages
2000/05/12
[#2843] Re: editors for ruby — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>
(Posted on comp.lang.ruby and ruby-talk ML.)
6 messages
2000/05/17
[#2874] RE: simple httpd for local use — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
> I personally use it for access to full-text indexed linux
6 messages
2000/05/18
[#2875] Re: simple httpd for local use
— hipster <hipster@...4all.nl>
2000/05/18
On Thu, 18 May 2000 09:10:28 +0200, Aleksi Niemelwrote:
[#2920] SWIG: virtual variable? — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...>
hello,
4 messages
2000/05/22
[#2928] FYI: What our Python friends are up to. — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>
Hi,
8 messages
2000/05/22
[#2964] Thank you — h.fulton@...
Thanks, Matz (and others) for your replies to
4 messages
2000/05/24
[#2973] Re: Socket.getnameinfo — ts <decoux@...>
>>>>> "D" == Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> writes:
10 messages
2000/05/25
[#3016] rbconfig.rb — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
5 messages
2000/05/28
[#3039] Re: Final for World Series: Python vs Ruby — "Dat Nguyen" <thucdat@...>
1 message
2000/05/30
[#3058] FailureClass? — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
Question arising from the FAQ:
7 messages
2000/05/31
[ruby-talk:02727] Re: Append alias for Array.append?
From:
"Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>
Date:
2000-05-11 03:42:29 UTC
List:
ruby-talk #2727
Hi, From: Dave Thomas > "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@jump.net> writes: > > > > Rather than having <<, push, append, tackOnTheEnd, enQueue, and all > > > the rest, why not have just one (say <<) and then distribute a > > > > Wait! Stop right there! > > > > Don't ruin a Good Idea (tm(tm(...))) by distributing oxymoronic standard > > deviations (tm(tm(...))). To new Ruby users, that would be tantamount to > > implementing the principle of increasing surprises. > > > > I prefer just one standard set of method names for the same reason I prefer > > just one standard set of keywords. (I realize that backwards compatibility > > will preclude achieving this until Ruby 3000, but this design goal should > > hold for everything new.) > > I happen to agree 100% (particularly if you all let _me_ choose the > set of methods to keep ;-). OK, it's a deal then. > (still waiting for c.l.r on his newsserver) That's outrageous. Maybe it's about time to prod your ISP. With a high-voltage cattleprod. Conrad