[#39227] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5264][Open] Commit 33157 — Charlie Savage <cfis@...>
[#39241] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3422][Closed] Object.const_get(:A, false) can access BasicObject::A — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 04:57, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
> Why is this issue closed? Is the current behaviour acceptable?
[#39260] RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...>
Before the release of Ruby 1.9.2 it was decided that Ruby releases
Hi,
(09/05/2011 03:54 AM), Marc-Andre Lafortune wrote:
Hi,
2011/9/5 Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@marc-andre.ca>:
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 3:08 AM, NARUSE, Yui <naruse@airemix.jp> wrote:
2011/9/5 Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@marc-andre.ca>:
I'll jump in with some context from the JRuby perspective.
2011/9/7 Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@headius.com>:
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:17 AM, NARUSE, Yui <naruse@airemix.jp> wrote:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto:
(2011/09/09 1:29), Michael Klishin wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:19 PM, NARUSE, Yui <naruse@airemix.jp> wrote:
Hello Luis,
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Masaya TARUI <tarui@prx.jp> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
(2011/09/08 15:28), Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
2011/9/9 Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@headius.com>:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 9:47 PM, NARUSE, Yui <naruse@airemix.jp> wrote:
I realize that I'm a small fish in this ocean, but for every release
(09/09/2011 03:51 PM), Kirk Haines wrote:
[#39267] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5273][Open] Float#round returns the wrong floats for higher precision — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...>
[#39279] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5276][Assigned] 4294967295.8.round is 4294967295 on 32bit — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...>
[#39304] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5285][Open] Ruby 1.9.2 throws exception on sort of array containing true AND false values — Martin Corino <mcorino@...>
[#39309] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5287][Open] 1.9.3 - Interpolation in a string causes the string's encoding to be set to ASCII-8BIT — Jon Leighton <j@...>
[#39326] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5291][Open] Enabling GC Profiler GC_PROFILE_MORE_DETAIL and CALC_EXACT_MALLOC_SIZE — Charlie Savage <cfis@...>
[#39360] What is the role of rb_objspace_t in gc.c? — Kurt Stephens <ks@...>
What is the role of rb_objectspace_t and the pointers to it inside gc.c?
[#39380] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5299][Open] Segmentation fault when using TweetStream gem in ruby 1.9.3 — Dushyanth Maguluru <dushyanth.maguluru@...>
[#39435] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5306][Open] Application Hangs Due to Recent rb_thread_select Changes — Charlie Savage <cfis@...>
[#39450] Comments on HowToReportEnglish — Andrew Grimm <andrew.j.grimm@...>
I've done some proofreading for HowToReportEnglish, and I'd like to
Hello,
Hello
[#39451] File.realpath behavior questions — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Hello,
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 4:48 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#39480] Modifications to libraries like Rake should be done upstream first — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Hello,
[#39484] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5309][Open] 0.6.to_r != "0.6".to_r — Brian Ford <brixen@...>
[#39487] File::BINARY does not behave as advertised — Cameron Pope <camerooni@...>
Hello -
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 16:00, Cameron Pope <camerooni@gmail.com> wrote:
[#39498] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5310][Open] Integral objects — Kenta Murata <muraken@...>
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Kenta Murata <muraken@gmail.com> wrote:
[#39539] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5321][Open] Introducing Numeric#exact? and Numeric#inexact? — Kenta Murata <muraken@...>
[#39597] File.expand_path ~username always trigger ArgumentError on Windows — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Hello,
[#39618] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5335][Open] [RFC/PATCH] test_old_thread_select: timing tweaks — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
[#39627] Re: [ruby-cvs:40472] drbrain:r33294 (trunk): * test/openssl/test_ssl.rb (class OpenSSL): Test — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
(2011/09/19 9:28), drbrain@ruby-lang.org wrote:
On Sep 19, 2011, at 11:33 AM, NARUSE, Yui wrote:
2011/9/19 Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net>:
[#39629] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5341][Open] Add SSL session reuse to Net::HTTP — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
On 10/26/2011 11:39 AM, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#39632] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5342][Open] ConditionVariable can wake a Thread that is no longer waiting on it — Mike Perham <mperham@...>
[#39634] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5343][Open] Unexpected blocking behavior when interrupt Socket#accept — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...>
[#39672] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5352][Open] How about using <> to represent Here Document? — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...>
[#39673] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5353][Open] TLS v1.0 and less - Attack on CBC mode — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...>
[#39684] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5357][Open] Indentation of nested operators should nest — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>
[#39690] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5360][Open] BasicObject#binding — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>
[#39696] Time spent on expanding load path — Juan Wajnerman <jwajnerman@...>
I've been following the performance of Ruby 1.9.x since the beginning. I work with many quite big Rails projects and as the number of used gems explode, the impact on the loading time for the application has increased very noticeably.
[#39700] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5364][Open] How about new syntax: "object.\method" returns a Method instance? — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...>
[#39704] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5365][Open] WEBrick lacks the application/javascript and image/svg+xml MIME types. — Hal Brodigan <postmodern.mod3@...>
[#39740] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol — Alex Young <alex@...>
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 06:18:19PM +0900, Alex Young wrote:
On 27/09/2011 19:46, Aaron Patterson wrote:
On Sep 27, 2011, at 6:52 PM, Alex Young wrote:
Eric Hodel wrote in post #1024462:
Hi,
On 04/10/11 16:52, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#39772] ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
(2011/09/30 5:37), hemant wrote:
On 09/30/2011 07:08 AM, SASADA Koichi wrote:
Revisit.
On Sep 20, 2012, at 6:14 PM, SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
(2012/09/25 7:38), Eric Hodel wrote:
I'm sorry for late reply.
(2012/09/25 15:18), Narihiro Nakamura wrote:
[ruby-core:39778] [Backport87 - Feature #4996] About 1.8.7 EOL
Issue #4996 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
=begin
Hi folks, I'd like to make an official announcement about this topic on www.ruby-lang.org.
Can you take a look at this draft? I'm sure my English is bad.
Hello, and thank you for your getting into our community.
I know most of you more or less use version 1.8.7 of Ruby today. It
was released in 2008 and was a state-of-art Ruby release back then.
-- I am proud to say it is no longer. Ruby's core developers have
been actively working on their new versions, 1.9, and they are about
to release new 1.9.3. I have been using 1.9 for years and now I
cannot go back to the days without it. Rich features. Faster
execution. Rubygems integrated. Rails works perfectly. I cannot but
say it is totally wonderful. Everyone please, use 1.9.
But at the same time I know you cannot switch to 1.9 right now for
various reasons. Maybe you have already been deployed your
application with 1.8.7. Maybe you use a 3rd party library and that is
for 1.8.7 only. Or maybe your Linux distribution only supports 1.8.7.
So I hereby announce you how long you can stick to it. It is OK you
are using 1.8.7 today but after a while, it will be shut down.
Please be ready.
Schedule:
* We continue to provide normal maintenance for 1.8.7 as usual, until
June 2012. You can safely assume we provide bugfixes and no
incompatibility shall be introduced.
* After that we stop bugfixes. We still provide security fixes until
June 2013, in case you are still using 1.8.7.
* We will no longer support 1.8.7 in all senses after June 2013.
=end
----------------------------------------
Feature #4996: About 1.8.7 EOL
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/4996
Author: Shyouhei Urabe
Status: Open
Priority: Normal
Assignee:
Category: core
Target version:
No, not now. Don't worry. But we have to start talking about this
topic: when and how 1.8.7 should die.
"You should really use 1.9". I have said this again and again and now
repeat it once more. As we're about to release 1.9.3 I can't but say
it is, totally wonderful. Rich features. Faster execution. Rubygems
integrated. Rails works perfectly. I've been using 1.9 for years and
now I can't go back to the days without it.
So why there's still 1.8.7? It's also clear: for system admins. So
far 1.8.7 has been adopted widely because it was a state of art ruby
implementation of the day it was released. Even after you stop
writing software for something, it needs bugfixes and maintenance
releases. For ruby 1.8.7 , that's what I'd been offering for these
three years.
Now... I know many of you're still developing your software against
1.8.7 in spite of its dead-endedness. Sooner or later the whole Ruby
community will move towards 1.9 and those 1.8.7-based systems are
expected to become unmaintained. I don't like the situation. I want
you and your system to be 1.9 ready.
So to encourage your moving towards 1.9, I think I should define
1.8.7's end-of-life to be at some point in the future. I guess you're
not moving to 1.9 because 1.8 is (or at least seems to be) maintained.
Let's stop it. We will no longer touch 1.8.7 in any way once after
the EOL. right?
My current timeline (to be rescheduled) is:
- Normal maintenance (as it is today): provided until June 2012,
- Security fixes: provided until June 2013.
Give us your opinioms.
--
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org