[#39227] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5264][Open] Commit 33157 — Charlie Savage <cfis@...>
3 messages
2011/09/01
[#39241] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3422][Closed] Object.const_get(:A, false) can access BasicObject::A — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
5 messages
2011/09/03
[#39251] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3422][Closed] Object.const_get(:A, false) can access BasicObject::A
— Magnus Holm <judofyr@...>
2011/09/03
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 04:57, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#39258] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3422][Closed] Object.const_get(:A, false) can access BasicObject::A
— KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2011/09/04
> Why is this issue closed? Is the current behaviour acceptable?
[#39260] RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...>
Before the release of Ruby 1.9.2 it was decided that Ruby releases
59 messages
2011/09/04
[#39263] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2011/09/04
Hi,
[#39269] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2011/09/05
(09/05/2011 03:54 AM), Marc-Andre Lafortune wrote:
[#39270] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...>
2011/09/05
Hi,
[#39275] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
2011/09/05
2011/9/5 Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@marc-andre.ca>:
[#39328] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...>
2011/09/07
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 3:08 AM, NARUSE, Yui <naruse@airemix.jp> wrote:
[#39276] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
2011/09/05
2011/9/5 Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@marc-andre.ca>:
[#39325] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
2011/09/07
I'll jump in with some context from the JRuby perspective.
[#39335] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
2011/09/07
2011/9/7 Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@headius.com>:
[#39365] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
2011/09/08
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:17 AM, NARUSE, Yui <naruse@airemix.jp> wrote:
[#39366] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2011/09/08
Hi,
[#39370] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Michael Klishin <michael.s.klishin@...>
2011/09/08
Yukihiro Matsumoto:
[#39374] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
2011/09/08
(2011/09/09 1:29), Michael Klishin wrote:
[#39376] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
2011/09/08
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:19 PM, NARUSE, Yui <naruse@airemix.jp> wrote:
[#39379] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Masaya TARUI <tarui@...>
2011/09/08
Hello Luis,
[#39382] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
2011/09/08
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Masaya TARUI <tarui@prx.jp> wrote:
[#39386] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
2011/09/08
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:
[#39387] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
2011/09/08
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
[#39388] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2011/09/08
(2011/09/08 15:28), Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#39394] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
2011/09/09
2011/9/9 Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@headius.com>:
[#39396] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
2011/09/09
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 9:47 PM, NARUSE, Yui <naruse@airemix.jp> wrote:
[#39414] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Kirk Haines <wyhaines@...>
2011/09/09
I realize that I'm a small fish in this ocean, but for every release
[#39418] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2011/09/09
(09/09/2011 03:51 PM), Kirk Haines wrote:
[#39267] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5273][Open] Float#round returns the wrong floats for higher precision — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...>
14 messages
2011/09/04
[#39279] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5276][Assigned] 4294967295.8.round is 4294967295 on 32bit — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...>
8 messages
2011/09/05
[#39318] [Backport93 - Backport #5276] 4294967295.8.round is 4294967295 on 32bit
— Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...>
2011/09/07
[#39304] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5285][Open] Ruby 1.9.2 throws exception on sort of array containing true AND false values — Martin Corino <mcorino@...>
4 messages
2011/09/06
[#39309] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5287][Open] 1.9.3 - Interpolation in a string causes the string's encoding to be set to ASCII-8BIT — Jon Leighton <j@...>
7 messages
2011/09/06
[#39311] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5287] 1.9.3 - Interpolation in a string causes the string's encoding to be set to ASCII-8BIT
— Jon Leighton <j@...>
2011/09/06
[#39326] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5291][Open] Enabling GC Profiler GC_PROFILE_MORE_DETAIL and CALC_EXACT_MALLOC_SIZE — Charlie Savage <cfis@...>
6 messages
2011/09/07
[#39360] What is the role of rb_objspace_t in gc.c? — Kurt Stephens <ks@...>
What is the role of rb_objectspace_t and the pointers to it inside gc.c?
4 messages
2011/09/08
[#39380] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5299][Open] Segmentation fault when using TweetStream gem in ruby 1.9.3 — Dushyanth Maguluru <dushyanth.maguluru@...>
6 messages
2011/09/08
[#39435] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5306][Open] Application Hangs Due to Recent rb_thread_select Changes — Charlie Savage <cfis@...>
27 messages
2011/09/09
[#39475] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5306] Application Hangs Due to Recent rb_thread_select Changes
— Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2011/09/11
[#39450] Comments on HowToReportEnglish — Andrew Grimm <andrew.j.grimm@...>
I've done some proofreading for HowToReportEnglish, and I'd like to
8 messages
2011/09/10
[#39452] Re: Comments on HowToReportEnglish
— Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...>
2011/09/10
Hello,
[#39453] Re: Comments on HowToReportEnglish
— Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...>
2011/09/10
Hello
[#39451] File.realpath behavior questions — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Hello,
10 messages
2011/09/10
[#39466] Re: File.realpath behavior questions
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2011/09/11
Hi,
[#39472] Re: File.realpath behavior questions
— Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
2011/09/11
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 4:48 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrot=
[#39480] Modifications to libraries like Rake should be done upstream first — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Hello,
3 messages
2011/09/12
[#39484] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5309][Open] 0.6.to_r != "0.6".to_r — Brian Ford <brixen@...>
5 messages
2011/09/12
[#39487] File::BINARY does not behave as advertised — Cameron Pope <camerooni@...>
Hello -
4 messages
2011/09/12
[#39489] Re: File::BINARY does not behave as advertised
— mathew <meta@...>
2011/09/12
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 16:00, Cameron Pope <camerooni@gmail.com> wrote:
[#39498] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5310][Open] Integral objects — Kenta Murata <muraken@...>
13 messages
2011/09/13
[#39500] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5310][Open] Integral objects
— brian ford <brixen@...>
2011/09/13
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Kenta Murata <muraken@gmail.com> wrote:
[#39539] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5321][Open] Introducing Numeric#exact? and Numeric#inexact? — Kenta Murata <muraken@...>
26 messages
2011/09/14
[#39597] File.expand_path ~username always trigger ArgumentError on Windows — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Hello,
3 messages
2011/09/17
[#39618] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5335][Open] [RFC/PATCH] test_old_thread_select: timing tweaks — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
5 messages
2011/09/19
[#39627] Re: [ruby-cvs:40472] drbrain:r33294 (trunk): * test/openssl/test_ssl.rb (class OpenSSL): Test — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
(2011/09/19 9:28), drbrain@ruby-lang.org wrote:
5 messages
2011/09/19
[#39628] Re: [ruby-cvs:40472] drbrain:r33294 (trunk): * test/openssl/test_ssl.rb (class OpenSSL): Test
— Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
2011/09/19
On Sep 19, 2011, at 11:33 AM, NARUSE, Yui wrote:
[#39667] Re: [ruby-cvs:40472] drbrain:r33294 (trunk): * test/openssl/test_ssl.rb (class OpenSSL): Test
— Martin Bo煬et <martin.bosslet@...>
2011/09/22
2011/9/19 Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net>:
[#39629] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5341][Open] Add SSL session reuse to Net::HTTP — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
18 messages
2011/09/19
[#40396] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5341] Add SSL session reuse to Net::HTTP
— Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
2011/10/26
[#40413] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5341] Add SSL session reuse to Net::HTTP
— Hiroshi Nakamura <nahi@...>
2011/10/26
On 10/26/2011 11:39 AM, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#39632] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5342][Open] ConditionVariable can wake a Thread that is no longer waiting on it — Mike Perham <mperham@...>
3 messages
2011/09/20
[#39634] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5343][Open] Unexpected blocking behavior when interrupt Socket#accept — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...>
10 messages
2011/09/20
[#39639] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5343] Unexpected blocking behavior when interrupt Socket#accept
— Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...>
2011/09/20
[#39672] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5352][Open] How about using <> to represent Here Document? — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...>
7 messages
2011/09/22
[#39673] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5353][Open] TLS v1.0 and less - Attack on CBC mode — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...>
13 messages
2011/09/22
[#39684] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5357][Open] Indentation of nested operators should nest — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>
7 messages
2011/09/23
[#39690] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5360][Open] BasicObject#binding — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>
6 messages
2011/09/24
[#39696] Time spent on expanding load path — Juan Wajnerman <jwajnerman@...>
I've been following the performance of Ruby 1.9.x since the beginning. I =
4 messages
2011/09/24
[#39700] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5364][Open] How about new syntax: "object.\method" returns a Method instance? — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...>
20 messages
2011/09/25
[#39704] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5365][Open] WEBrick lacks the application/javascript and image/svg+xml MIME types. — Hal Brodigan <postmodern.mod3@...>
4 messages
2011/09/25
[#39740] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol — Alex Young <alex@...>
18 messages
2011/09/27
[#39743] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol
— Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>
2011/09/27
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 06:18:19PM +0900, Alex Young wrote:
[#39754] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol
— Alex Young <alex@...>
2011/09/27
On 27/09/2011 19:46, Aaron Patterson wrote:
[#39807] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol
— Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
2011/10/01
On Sep 27, 2011, at 6:52 PM, Alex Young wrote:
[#39843] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol
— Alex Young <alex@...>
2011/10/02
Eric Hodel wrote in post #1024462:
[#39936] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2011/10/04
Hi,
[#39943] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol
— Alex Young <alex@...>
2011/10/04
On 04/10/11 16:52, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#39772] ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
13 messages
2011/09/29
[#39774] Re: ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2011/09/29
Hi,
[#39785] Re: ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array
— hemant <gethemant@...>
2011/09/30
Hi,
[#39789] Re: ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2011/09/30
(2011/09/30 5:37), hemant wrote:
[#39812] Re: ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array
— Tim Felgentreff <tim@...1.de>
2011/10/01
On 09/30/2011 07:08 AM, SASADA Koichi wrote:
[#47627] Re: ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2012/09/21
Revisit.
[#47682] Re: ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array
— Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
2012/09/24
On Sep 20, 2012, at 6:14 PM, SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#47686] Re: ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2012/09/25
(2012/09/25 7:38), Eric Hodel wrote:
[#47687] Re: ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array
— Narihiro Nakamura <authornari@...>
2012/09/25
I'm sorry for late reply.
[#47688] Re: ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2012/09/25
(2012/09/25 15:18), Narihiro Nakamura wrote:
[ruby-core:39481] Re: Modifications to libraries like Rake should be done upstream first
From:
"U.Nakamura" <usa@...>
Date:
2011-09-12 15:45:30 UTC
List:
ruby-core #39481
Hello,
In message "[ruby-core:39480] Modifications to libraries like Rake should be done upstream first"
on Sep.13,2011 00:16:49, <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please, before modify such libraries submit your modification upstream
> and provide a link in your commit message if possible, so avoids
> frustration tracking down discrepancies.
r33254 is only workaround for MRI.
I squeezed this out for MRI, because I'm one of the charges
who look after MRI.
Rake team will make another solution for rake.
It's rake team's task, but not mine because I'm not a member
of rake team.
I reported this problem to rake team first (I hope the github
issue page is the right place) , and waited some days.
I got no response, so I did my work.
By the way, if there are any problems in the above process, somebody
who are troubled by the problems will take a certain action, I expected.
Since I am not troubled by this, I do not have the mind to do more
for this issue.
I hope not to offend someone by my awkward English.
Regards,
--
U.Nakamura <usa@garbagecollect.jp>