[#39260] RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...>

Before the release of Ruby 1.9.2 it was decided that Ruby releases

59 messages 2011/09/04
[#39276] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/09/05

2011/9/5 Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@marc-andre.ca>:

[#39325] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/09/07

I'll jump in with some context from the JRuby perspective.

[#39335] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/09/07

2011/9/7 Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@headius.com>:

[#39365] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/09/08

On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:17 AM, NARUSE, Yui <naruse@airemix.jp> wrote:

[#39366] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/09/08

Hi,

[#39370] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Michael Klishin <michael.s.klishin@...> 2011/09/08

Yukihiro Matsumoto:

[#39374] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/09/08

(2011/09/09 1:29), Michael Klishin wrote:

[#39376] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/09/08

On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:19 PM, NARUSE, Yui <naruse@airemix.jp> wrote:

[#39379] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Masaya TARUI <tarui@...> 2011/09/08

Hello Luis,

[#39382] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/09/08

On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Masaya TARUI <tarui@prx.jp> wrote:

[#39386] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/09/08

On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:

[#39267] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5273][Open] Float#round returns the wrong floats for higher precision — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...>

14 messages 2011/09/04

[#39435] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5306][Open] Application Hangs Due to Recent rb_thread_select Changes — Charlie Savage <cfis@...>

27 messages 2011/09/09

[#39498] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5310][Open] Integral objects — Kenta Murata <muraken@...>

13 messages 2011/09/13

[#39539] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5321][Open] Introducing Numeric#exact? and Numeric#inexact? — Kenta Murata <muraken@...>

26 messages 2011/09/14

[#39629] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5341][Open] Add SSL session reuse to Net::HTTP — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

18 messages 2011/09/19

[#39634] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5343][Open] Unexpected blocking behavior when interrupt Socket#accept — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...>

10 messages 2011/09/20

[#39673] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5353][Open] TLS v1.0 and less - Attack on CBC mode — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...>

13 messages 2011/09/22

[#39700] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5364][Open] How about new syntax: "object.\method" returns a Method instance? — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...>

20 messages 2011/09/25

[#39740] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol — Alex Young <alex@...>

18 messages 2011/09/27
[#39743] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2011/09/27

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 06:18:19PM +0900, Alex Young wrote:

[#39754] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol — Alex Young <alex@...> 2011/09/27

On 27/09/2011 19:46, Aaron Patterson wrote:

[#39807] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2011/10/01

On Sep 27, 2011, at 6:52 PM, Alex Young wrote:

[#39751] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5375][Open] [mingw32] segfault on WinXP SP3 with 1.9.3dev@33347 — Jon Forums <redmine@...>

26 messages 2011/09/27

[#39772] ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>

Hi,

13 messages 2011/09/29
[#39774] Re: ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/09/29

Hi,

[#39796] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5384][Open] Ruby 1.9.3-RC1 Fails to Compile on Solaris — Cyrus Lopez <cyrus@...>

11 messages 2011/09/30

[ruby-core:39638] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5342][Open] ConditionVariable can wake a Thread that is no longer waiting on it

From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>
Date: 2011-09-20 09:16:51 UTC
List: ruby-core #39638
Hi

2011/9/20 Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>:
> Mike Perham <mperham@gmail.com> wrote:
>> ruby -v: ruby 1.9.2p290 (2011-07-09 revision 32553) [x86_64-darwin10.8.0=
]
>>
>> See gist at https://gist.github.com/1228184 for a reproducible test case=
.
>
> I can confirm the test case fails on 1.9.2-p290 on x86_32 Linux, too.
>
> ruby_1_9_3 r33290 appears good, however. =A0The GVL was reimplemented for
> 1.9.3 to improve fairness and performance, so there are likely bugs
> fixed along the way.

The bug was fixed by following commit. (r27711)
It haven't backported 1.9.2 yet.

commit f4053cf5554deb0051aabfc90180784236f1f25b
Author: mame <mame@b2dd03c8-39d4-4d8f-98ff-823fe69b080e>
Date:   Sun May 9 17:10:18 2010 +0000

    * lib/thread.rb (ConditionVariable#wait): ensure to remove the current
      thread from waiters.  [ruby-core:29835]

    git-svn-id: svn+ssh://ci.ruby-lang.org/ruby/trunk@27711
b2dd03c8-39d4-4d8f-98ff-823fe69b080e

diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index 7677a70..91c0e41 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+Mon May 10 02:07:20 2010  Yusuke Endoh  <mame@tsg.ne.jp>
+
+       * lib/thread.rb (ConditionVariable#wait): ensure to remove the curr=
ent
+         thread from waiters.  [ruby-core:29835]
+
 Mon May 10 00:54:15 2010  Nobuyoshi Nakada  <nobu@ruby-lang.org>

        * ext/io/console/console.c (console_set_raw): new method.
diff --git a/lib/thread.rb b/lib/thread.rb
index f3831a7..88f834c 100644
--- a/lib/thread.rb
+++ b/lib/thread.rb
@@ -69,6 +69,10 @@ class ConditionVariable
         @waiters.push(Thread.current)
       end
       mutex.sleep timeout
+    ensure
+      @waiters_mutex.synchronize do
+        @waiters.delete(Thread.current)
+      end
     end
     self
   end

In This Thread

Prev Next