[#39227] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5264][Open] Commit 33157 — Charlie Savage <cfis@...>
[#39241] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3422][Closed] Object.const_get(:A, false) can access BasicObject::A — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 04:57, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
> Why is this issue closed? Is the current behaviour acceptable?
[#39260] RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...>
Before the release of Ruby 1.9.2 it was decided that Ruby releases
Hi,
(09/05/2011 03:54 AM), Marc-Andre Lafortune wrote:
Hi,
2011/9/5 Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@marc-andre.ca>:
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 3:08 AM, NARUSE, Yui <naruse@airemix.jp> wrote:
2011/9/5 Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@marc-andre.ca>:
I'll jump in with some context from the JRuby perspective.
2011/9/7 Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@headius.com>:
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:17 AM, NARUSE, Yui <naruse@airemix.jp> wrote:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto:
(2011/09/09 1:29), Michael Klishin wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:19 PM, NARUSE, Yui <naruse@airemix.jp> wrote:
Hello Luis,
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Masaya TARUI <tarui@prx.jp> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
(2011/09/08 15:28), Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
2011/9/9 Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@headius.com>:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 9:47 PM, NARUSE, Yui <naruse@airemix.jp> wrote:
I realize that I'm a small fish in this ocean, but for every release
(09/09/2011 03:51 PM), Kirk Haines wrote:
[#39267] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5273][Open] Float#round returns the wrong floats for higher precision — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...>
[#39279] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5276][Assigned] 4294967295.8.round is 4294967295 on 32bit — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...>
[#39304] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5285][Open] Ruby 1.9.2 throws exception on sort of array containing true AND false values — Martin Corino <mcorino@...>
[#39309] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5287][Open] 1.9.3 - Interpolation in a string causes the string's encoding to be set to ASCII-8BIT — Jon Leighton <j@...>
[#39326] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5291][Open] Enabling GC Profiler GC_PROFILE_MORE_DETAIL and CALC_EXACT_MALLOC_SIZE — Charlie Savage <cfis@...>
[#39360] What is the role of rb_objspace_t in gc.c? — Kurt Stephens <ks@...>
What is the role of rb_objectspace_t and the pointers to it inside gc.c?
[#39380] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5299][Open] Segmentation fault when using TweetStream gem in ruby 1.9.3 — Dushyanth Maguluru <dushyanth.maguluru@...>
[#39435] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5306][Open] Application Hangs Due to Recent rb_thread_select Changes — Charlie Savage <cfis@...>
[#39450] Comments on HowToReportEnglish — Andrew Grimm <andrew.j.grimm@...>
I've done some proofreading for HowToReportEnglish, and I'd like to
Hello,
Hello
[#39451] File.realpath behavior questions — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Hello,
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 4:48 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrot=
[#39480] Modifications to libraries like Rake should be done upstream first — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Hello,
[#39484] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5309][Open] 0.6.to_r != "0.6".to_r — Brian Ford <brixen@...>
[#39487] File::BINARY does not behave as advertised — Cameron Pope <camerooni@...>
Hello -
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 16:00, Cameron Pope <camerooni@gmail.com> wrote:
[#39498] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5310][Open] Integral objects — Kenta Murata <muraken@...>
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Kenta Murata <muraken@gmail.com> wrote:
[#39539] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5321][Open] Introducing Numeric#exact? and Numeric#inexact? — Kenta Murata <muraken@...>
[#39597] File.expand_path ~username always trigger ArgumentError on Windows — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Hello,
[#39618] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5335][Open] [RFC/PATCH] test_old_thread_select: timing tweaks — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
[#39627] Re: [ruby-cvs:40472] drbrain:r33294 (trunk): * test/openssl/test_ssl.rb (class OpenSSL): Test — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
(2011/09/19 9:28), drbrain@ruby-lang.org wrote:
On Sep 19, 2011, at 11:33 AM, NARUSE, Yui wrote:
2011/9/19 Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net>:
[#39629] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5341][Open] Add SSL session reuse to Net::HTTP — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
On 10/26/2011 11:39 AM, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#39632] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5342][Open] ConditionVariable can wake a Thread that is no longer waiting on it — Mike Perham <mperham@...>
[#39634] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5343][Open] Unexpected blocking behavior when interrupt Socket#accept — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...>
[#39672] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5352][Open] How about using <> to represent Here Document? — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...>
[#39673] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5353][Open] TLS v1.0 and less - Attack on CBC mode — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...>
[#39684] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5357][Open] Indentation of nested operators should nest — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>
[#39690] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5360][Open] BasicObject#binding — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>
[#39696] Time spent on expanding load path — Juan Wajnerman <jwajnerman@...>
I've been following the performance of Ruby 1.9.x since the beginning. I =
[#39700] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5364][Open] How about new syntax: "object.\method" returns a Method instance? — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...>
[#39704] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5365][Open] WEBrick lacks the application/javascript and image/svg+xml MIME types. — Hal Brodigan <postmodern.mod3@...>
[#39740] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol — Alex Young <alex@...>
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 06:18:19PM +0900, Alex Young wrote:
On 27/09/2011 19:46, Aaron Patterson wrote:
On Sep 27, 2011, at 6:52 PM, Alex Young wrote:
Eric Hodel wrote in post #1024462:
Hi,
On 04/10/11 16:52, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#39772] ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
(2011/09/30 5:37), hemant wrote:
On 09/30/2011 07:08 AM, SASADA Koichi wrote:
Revisit.
On Sep 20, 2012, at 6:14 PM, SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
(2012/09/25 7:38), Eric Hodel wrote:
I'm sorry for late reply.
(2012/09/25 15:18), Narihiro Nakamura wrote:
[ruby-core:39487] File::BINARY does not behave as advertised
Hello -
I had posted this to ruby-task earlier today, but I have been informed
that ruby-core is the better forum.
I noticed some anamolous behavior opening files with the file mode
flags. If the default internal encoding is set, when using the file
mode flags to open a file, the file's external encoding is set to
something other than ASCII-8BIT, which can cause binary file
operations (such as Marshal.dump) to blow up. Since I have benefitted
from Ruby very much, I would like to do whatever I can to help fix the
issue.
Please forgive the long message, and let me know if it would be more
appropriate to log a bug, but since I've never posted an Ruby issue
before, I wanted to make sure I was not being naive and that I
understand what is really going on.
Here is a simple example of the problem that I am seeing:
#/usr/bin/env ruby
Encoding.default_internal = 'UTF-8'
File.open('test',File::CREAT | File::RDWR | File::BINARY) do |f|
# This should be ASCII-8BIT, right? At least according to io.c, line 10792
puts "Integer Flags Encoding: #{f.external_encoding.to_s}"
end
File.open('test2','w+b') do |f|
# This actually is ASCII-8BIT
puts "String Mode Encoding: #{f.external_encoding.to_s}"
end
And running it:
file-binary-test cpope$ ruby simple_file_test.rb
Integer Flags Encoding: UTF-8
String Mode Encoding: ASCII-8BIT
I don't think that is the intended behavior. If I look at IO.c in the
latest Ruby code snapshot:
--- io.c (last night's snapshot)
10792 #ifndef O_BINARY
10793 # define O_BINARY 0
10794 #endif
10795 /* disable line code conversion and make ASCII-8BIT */
10796 rb_file_const("BINARY", INT2FIX(O_BINARY));
As one can see above, first of all, File::BINARY will be zero in every
case that I can suss out in the Ruby source code - there is nowhere in
the 1.9.x codebase I can see that defines O_BINARY to be anything but
zero, and as was empirically demonstrated above, opening a file with
this constant will not set the encoding to ASCII-8BIT. What is really
bad about this is when using the integer flags to open a file, there
is not a good way to check if a developer intended for a it to be
opened as a binary file. There is, of course, a way to manually
specify the encoding for a file opened with the integer flags, which
would be the right thing to do in the case above.
So my first question is: How do we address this deficiency? I can't
think of a better way than to document the 'catch' with using the
integer flags in this case. I've noticed that many of the File
constants aren't documented, so I'm happy to give it a shot if that's
the best approach.
But this brings us to another issue. There are some places in the Ruby
standard library that depend on files opened using File::BINARY
actually opening a file suitable for writing Binary data. For example,
in PStore:
At the top of lib/pstore.rb
96 class PStore
97 binmode = defined?(File::BINARY) ? File::BINARY : 0
98 RDWR_ACCESS = File::RDWR | File::CREAT | binmode
99 RD_ACCESS = File::RDONLY | binmode
100 WR_ACCESS = File::WRONLY | File::CREAT | File::TRUNC | binmode
These flags are passed to the bottlenecks that open the data file for
reading and writing. Because it is using the integer constants to
define how the file is opened, it's not hard to make PStore blow up in
the course or normal operation. To conserve space, I've put some
sample code in this gist: https://gist.github.com/1211614
So my second thought is that this is an issue with the PStore library,
and that it would be appropriate to modify the file bottlenecks so
they explicitly specify ASCII-8BIT as the file encoding. Is there any
reason that I should not log the PStore issue as bug with a test and a
patch?
Thank you for your time,
Cameron
--
Cameron Pope
camerooni@gmailcom