From: Luis Lavena Date: 2011-09-13T01:01:23+09:00 Subject: [ruby-core:39482] Re: Modifications to libraries like Rake should be done upstream first On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 12:45 PM, U.Nakamura wrote: > Hello, > > r33254 is only workaround for MRI. > I squeezed this out for MRI, because I'm one of the charges > who look after MRI. > Problem is that issue exist in standalone rake, so newer release that can be installed on top of MRI can present the issue or the misleading failure. > Rake team will make another solution for rake. > It's rake team's task, but not mine because I'm not a member > of rake team. > > > I reported this problem to rake team first (I hope the github > issue page is the right place) , and waited some days. > I got no response, so I did my work. > Hmn, sorry to hear that, actually I sent a pull request a few weeks ago: https://github.com/jimweirich/rake/pull/72 Also with no response, as you. > By the way, if there are any problems in the above process, somebody > who are troubled by the problems will take a certain action, I expected. Understood. Thank you for your explanation, will followup with library maintainers. -- Luis Lavena AREA 17 - Perfection in design is achieved not when there is nothing more to add, but rather when there is nothing more to take away. Antoine de Saint-Exup�ry