From: Joshua Ballanco Date: 2011-09-27T03:56:42+09:00 Subject: [ruby-core:39733] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5364] How about new syntax: "object.\method" returns a Method instance? --4e80cae5_5f3534a4_10b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Monday, September 26, 2011 at 2:37 AM, Joey Zhou wrote: > Joshua Ballanco and Yusuke Endoh san remind me the deeper subject: what's the future plan about the relationship between Proc and Method? I think that, in order to address Method and Proc and how to go forward with them, we first need to meditate a bit about Ruby's treatment of first-class environments (or, in Ruby parlance, 'binding'). I will be giving a presentation at RubyConf this coming Thursday in which I hope to present what I feel are the biggest concerns surrounding environments. If anyone will be attending and would like to discuss bindings, methods, procs, and lambdas, I would love to get together and chat... --4e80cae5_5f3534a4_10b Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
On Monday, September 26, 2011 at 2:37 AM, Joey= Zhou wrote:
Joshua Ballanco and Yusuke Endoh san = remind me the deeper subject: what's the future plan about the relationsh= ip between Proc and Method=3F
I think that, in order to address Method and Proc and how to = go forward with them, we first need to meditate a bit about Ruby's treatm= ent of first-class environments (or, in Ruby parlance, 'binding'). I will= be giving a presentation at RubyConf this coming Thursday in which I hop= e to present what I feel are the biggest concerns surrounding environment= s. If anyone will be attending and would like to discuss bindings, method= s, procs, and lambdas, I would love to get together and chat...  --4e80cae5_5f3534a4_10b--