[#32009] merging nokogiri to ext/ — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>
I would like to merge nokogiri to ext for the 1.9.3 release. I spoke to
Hello,
Hi,
On Sep 4, 2010, at 3:19 PM, Benoit Daloze wrote:
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 4:30 PM, James Edward Gray II
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 9:19 PM, <brabuhr@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sep 5, 2010, at 12:28 PM, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 05:02:09AM +0900, Joshua Ballanco wrote:
> Supposedly there are REXML tests that are maintained outside of Ruby,
Hello,
Hi,
2010/9/3 NARUSE, Yui <naruse@airemix.jp>:
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 04:27:07PM +0900, NARUSE, Yui wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 12:17:03AM +0900, Yusuke ENDOH wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 02:34:09PM +0900, NARUSE, Yui wrote:
Hi,
Currently, we're discussing three different topics:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 01:40:34AM +0900, Yusuke ENDOH wrote:
Hello,
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 12:33:07PM +0900, Yusuke ENDOH wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 10:13:31PM +0900, Yusuke ENDOH wrote:
As an alternate approach:
2010/9/10 James Cox <james@imaj.es>:
[#32056] [Ruby 1.8-Bug#3788][Open] URI cannot parse IPv6 addresses propertly — Adam Majer <redmine@...>
Bug #3788: URI cannot parse IPv6 addresses propertly
Issue #3788 has been updated by Adam Majer.
2010/9/8 Adam Majer <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:
[#32110] Ruby 2.0 Wiki/Wish-list? — Joshua Ballanco <jballanc@...>
Hi all,
2010/9/8 Joshua Ballanco <jballanc@gmail.com>:
On Sep 7, 2010, at 5:21 PM, NARUSE, Yui wrote:
Hi,
On Sep 8, 2010, at 12:37 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Sep 8, 2010, at 2:00 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
> -- "def" returns a lambda instead of nil
> So, for example, a few things I've wanted for a long time:
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 4:20 AM, "Martin J. Dürst"
I really miss those features:
[#32135] [Ruby-Bug#3802][Open] freeaddrinfo not found in WS2_32.dll — Thomas Volkmar Worm <redmine@...>
Bug #3802: freeaddrinfo not found in WS2_32.dll
Issue #3802 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.
Hi,
Hello,
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:44 PM, U.Nakamura <usa@garbagecollect.jp> wrote:
2010/10/13 Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com>:
[#32154] Making custom_lambda() work — Magnus Holm <judofyr@...>
A tiny suggestion for how we could make it possible to call lambdas
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 18:21, Magnus Holm <judofyr@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 18:57, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:
[#32156] Can we convert the standard library to gems? — James Edward Gray II <james@...>
Taken from the bundle Nokogiri thread:
On 2010-09-09 01:45:43 +0900, James Edward Gray II wrote:
On Sep 8, 2010, at 12:03 PM, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
On 2010-09-09 02:54:26 +0900, James Edward Gray II wrote:
On Sep 8, 2010, at 3:26 PM, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
On 2010-09-09 06:11:15 +0900, James Edward Gray II wrote:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 05:26:54AM +0900, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
On 10/09/10 at 02:41 +0900, Aaron Patterson wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:54 AM, Lucas Nussbaum
ok, this is not exactly on topic, but I'm using Debian and Ubuntu a
Hi Elise,
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 02:06:50AM +0900, Yusuke ENDOH wrote:
Hi,
I'm off today so sorry if I missed some mails.
Urabe,
(2010/09/10 23:48), James Cox wrote:
I'm at an airport back to my home so in short,
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 6:51 AM, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
(2010/09/13 3:54), James Cox wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
How difficult to make myself understood in English.
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 1:43 AM, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp> wrote:
On 2010-09-16 01:42:39 +0900, James Cox wrote:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Marcus Rueckert <darix@opensu.se> wrote:
On 2010-09-16 03:36:56 +0900, James Cox wrote:
On Wednesday, September 15, 2010, Marcus Rueckert <darix@opensu.se> wrote:
On 16/09/10 at 11:02 +0900, James Cox wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 1:59 AM, Lucas Nussbaum
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:41 AM, James Tucker <jftucker@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2010-09-16 03:36:56 +0900, James Cox wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Marcus Rueckert <darix@opensu.se> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 10:45 AM, James Edward Gray II
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@gmail.com> wrote:
[#32165] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#3805][Open] Ruby generated gem specifications for bundled projects are incorrect — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>
Bug #3805: Ruby generated gem specifications for bundled projects are incorrect
[#32200] Ruby 2.0 Wish-list? — Rocky Bernstein <rockyb@...>
Any plans for error messages in languages other than English?
[#32248] Replacing stdlib Date with C version — Jeremy Evans <code@...>
I've recently been working on a replacement for the stdlib Date class,
Hi,
On 09/10 07:23, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
Hi,
[#32351] Cross-compilation bugs and seek for help — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Hello,
It might be off topic though I have to mention this anyway. This is not for
[#32353] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#3825][Open] ENV.delete raise Exception on Windows — Heesob Park <redmine@...>
Bug #3825: ENV.delete raise Exception on Windows
[#32453] Why doesn’t Enumerable define a #last method? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>
Hi!
On 17 September 2010 12:19, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:
(2010/09/17 19:19), Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 13:00, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#32454] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#3845][Open] "in" infix operator — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...>
Feature #3845: "in" infix operator
On 17 September 2010 12:30, Yusuke Endoh <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 1:48 AM, Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp> wrote:
Hi,
Hello Yusuke,
[#32465] [Ruby-Feature#3848][Open] Using http basic authentication for FTP with Open URI — Jérémy Lecour <redmine@...>
Feature #3848: Using http basic authentication for FTP with Open URI
On Sep 17, 2010, at 2:02 PM, J駻駑y Lecour wrote:
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 13:19, James Edward Gray II
On Sep 26, 2010, at 8:44 PM, mathew wrote:
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 20:57, James Edward Gray II
[#32469] ruby.lib vs VC++ — Phlip <phlip2005@...>
Here's a nice sample program to illustrate my problem:
[#32478] [Ruby-Feature#3851][Open] Ruby 1.9.2p0 crash on filename with '[' — Jon Lambert <redmine@...>
Feature #3851: Ruby 1.9.2p0 crash on filename with '['
[#32506] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#3863][Open] [BUG] unknown type 0x22 (0xc given) — Jay Borenstein <redmine@...>
Bug #3863: [BUG] unknown type 0x22 (0xc given)
[#32529] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#3869][Open] Logger#log does not handle or escape new-line characters. — Hal Brodigan <redmine@...>
Bug #3869: Logger#log does not handle or escape new-line characters.
[#32565] RUBY_PLATFORM on MinGW64 (was: List of possible casting issues under LLP64) — wanabe <s.wanabe@...>
Hello,
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 7:52 PM, wanabe <s.wanabe@gmail.com> wrote:
[#32585] Proposal for Optional Static Typing for Ruby — Martin Pilkington <pilky@...>
Hi,
Hi
Hi,
Hi Matz
Martin,
Hi,
On Sep 28, 2010, at 12:35 PM, Loren Segal wrote:
On Sep 28, 2010, at 2:47 PM, Loren Segal wrote:
Hi Loren, Joshua
Hi All,
It strikes me that much of the premise behind this thread is misguided as it overlooks the importance of meta-programming in developing any Ruby program of substantive size. Where a Java or C++ programmer might write a factory method to create instances of a class and spend much of their effort enumerating types explicitly, it's not unusual in Ruby to write meta-programs which create a variety of class and method definitions on request to create or repurpose object instances for the task at hand.
Eleanor,
On 29 Sep 2010, at 16:03, Loren Segal wrote:
Hi Ellie,
Hi,
On Sep 29, 2010, at 12:33 AM, Bill Kelly wrote:
[#32614] Long lines in mails sent from Mail.app (Was: Re: Parameter and Return Interface Specification) — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 14:20, Asher <asher@ridiculouspower.com> wrote:
[#32634] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#3889][Open] Incorrectly detected i686-w64-mingw32 as x64-mingw — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>
Bug #3889: Incorrectly detected i686-w64-mingw32 as x64-mingw
Issue #3889 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.
Issue #3889 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 02:03:23PM +0900, Shyouhei Urabe wrote:
Issue #3889 has been updated by Luis Lavena.
[ruby-core:32248] Replacing stdlib Date with C version
I've recently been working on a replacement for the stdlib Date class, called home_run. It's written in C and is much faster than the stdlib version. On 1.9.2, it's about 2-70x faster than the stdlib for common operations. See http://github.com/jeremyevans/home_run With speed comes a price, which is that it is not fully compatible, and it would be difficult to make it fully compatible without greatly increasing the complexity of the library. Here are the differences I know about between the stdlib and home_run: * Written in C (mostly) instead of ruby. Stores information in a C structure, and therefore has a range limitation. home_run cannot handle dates after 5874773-08-15 or before -5877752-05-08 on 32-bit platforms (with larger limits for 64-bit platforms). * The Date class does not store fractional days (e.g. hours, minutes), or offsets. The DateTime class does handle fractional days and offsets. * The DateTime class stores fractional days as the number of nanoseconds since midnight, so it cannot deal with differences less than a nanosecond. * Neither Date nor DateTime uses rational. Places where the standard library returns rationals, home_run returns integers or floats. * Because rational is not used, it is not required. This can break other libraries that use rational without directly requiring it. * There is no support for modifying the date of calendar reform, the sg arguments are ignored and the Gregorian calendar is always used. This means that julian day 0 is -4173-11-24, instead of -4712-01-01. * The undocumented Date#strftime format modifiers are not supported. * The DateTime offset is checked for reasonableness. home_run does not support offsets with an absolute difference of more than 14 hours from UTC. * DateTime offsets are stored in minutes, so it will round offsets with fractional minutes to the nearest minute. * All public class and instance methods for both Date and DateTime are implemented, except that the allocate class method is not available and on 1.9, _dump and _load are used instead of marshal_dump and marshal_load. * Only the public API is compatible, the private methods in the standard library are not implemented. * The marshalling format differs from the one used by the standard library. Note that the 1.8 and 1.9 standard library date marshalling formats differ from each other. * Date#step treats the step value as an integer, so it cannot handle steps of fractional days. DateTime#step can handle fractional day steps, though. * When parsing the %Q modifier in _strptime, the hash returned includes an Integer :seconds value and a Float :sec_fraction value instead of a single rational :seconds value. * The string returned by #inspect has a different format, since it doesn't use rational. * You can use the Date::Format::STYLE hash to change how to parse DD/DD/DD and DD.DD.DD date formats, allowing you to get ruby 1.9 behavior on 1.8 or vice-versa. This is probably the only new feature in that isn't in the standard library. It's possible to make home_run more compatible with the stdlib, for example by supporting the date of calendar reform or by supporting the undocumented strftime modifiers. Changes such as supporting rational or fractional nanoseconds would be significantly more involved. I designed home_run so that it would fully serve the needs of 99% of rubyists. For the 1% that need the features that home_run does not provide, they could either use the current stdlib (either moved elsewhere in the stdlib or made available as a gem), or Tadayoshi Funaba's date2 or date4 libraries (http://www.funaba.org/en/ruby.html). There are a couple possible issues with home_run's implementation that do not affect backwards compatibility but you may want to consider: * home_run stores fractional days (nanoseconds since midnight) in a long long. So the current version would not work on platforms that don't support long long. * home_run uses Ragel to speed up Date._parse for common date formats. This means that you need Ragel if you want to modify the C parser. The Ragel/C parser is only used to speed up parsing, if it doesn't match, home_run falls back on using a faster version of the current date/format.rb. So my questions for ruby-core: * Is it possible to replace the current stdlib date support with home_run? * If so, could it be taken as is, or are changes to increase backwards compatibility required first? * If changes are required first, which changes would you like to see? * If you don't think it is a good idea to replace the current stdlib with home_run, could you give a short explanation of your reasoning? Thank you, Jeremy Evans