From: Giuseppe Bilotta Date: 2010-09-06T04:28:13+09:00 Subject: [ruby-core:32069] Re: merging nokogiri to ext/ On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 9:19 PM, wrote: > On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 4:30 PM, James Edward Gray II > wrote: >> On Sep 4, 2010, at 3:19 PM, Benoit Daloze wrote: >> >>> It would of course be even easier if Nokogiri was made the default. >> >> Yeah, I'm surprised to see so little support for Nokogiri. �I would be very for adding it. > > I have no particular objection to switching from REXML to Nokogiri, > but I would object to removing REXML without a replacement. �(Though > REXML has pretty much always met my needs just fine.) I have a question about this REXML vs Nokogiri debate: does Nokogiri offer a REXML-compaitble interface? If this is the case (or if one could be easily written), then the Nokogiri / REXML replacement could happen without breaking anything -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta