From: Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
Date: 2010-09-15T14:43:42+09:00
Subject: [ruby-core:32393] Re: Can we convert the standard library to gems?

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig10D17E171B92D394793DC718
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

How difficult to make myself understood in English.

(2010/09/15 2:00), James Cox wrote:
>> I've been thinking about it for a few days and suddenly realized that =
this is
>> totally off topic :) I'll cut the thread for it later.
>>
>=20
> So you now have no blocking reason for not switching to gems?

I never have.  I don't believe that switching to gems, that alone, would =
solve
my situation.  So go ahead.  The real change (if any) might happen when w=
e
drop them from our repo.


--------------enig10D17E171B92D394793DC718
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=xD6f
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig10D17E171B92D394793DC718--