From: "NARUSE, Yui" Date: 2010-09-09T12:27:37+09:00 Subject: [ruby-core:32204] Re: merging nokogiri to ext/ 2010/9/9 James Edward Gray II : > On Sep 8, 2010, at 8:15 PM, Aaron Patterson wrote: > >> I think the best options to improve the situation are: >> >> �1. Remove REXML so that users must search for an XML library >> >> �2. Package nokogiri so that users have a better alternative >> >> �3. Remove REXML *and* package nokogiri >> >> I understand we cannot remove REXML for 1.9.x, but maybe we should >> consider packaging nokogiri so people have an alternative? �I would like >> to see #2 for Ruby 1.9.3+, then #3 for Ruby 2.0. > > I fully support this plan. > > I'm sad that I was allowed to replace the old CSV library but Aaron is struggling to replace REXML with a super superior library. �XML is way more important than CSV. Replacing CSV is before 1.9.0, so incompatibility is allowed. The fact that fastercsv is pure ruby is also the difference. -- NARUSE, Yui naruse@airemix.jp