[#83328] tcltklib and not init'ing tk — aakhter@... (Aamer Akhter)

Hello,

13 messages 2003/10/01

[#83391] mixing in class methods — "Mark J. Reed" <markjreed@...>

Okay, probably a dumb question, but: is there any way to define

22 messages 2003/10/01
[#83392] Re: mixing in class methods — Ryan Pavlik <rpav@...> 2003/10/01

On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 06:02:32 +0900

[#83397] Re: mixing in class methods — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2003/10/01

On Thursday, October 2, 2003, 7:08:00 AM, Ryan wrote:

[#83399] Re: mixing in class methods — "Mark J. Reed" <markjreed@...> 2003/10/02

On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 07:37:25AM +0900, Gavin Sinclair wrote:

[#83404] Re: mixing in class methods — "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair@...> 2003/10/02

> On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 07:37:25AM +0900, Gavin Sinclair wrote:

[#83416] C or C++? — "Joe Cheng" <code@...>

I'd like to start writing Ruby extensions. Does it make a difference

32 messages 2003/10/02
[#83435] Re: C or C++? — "Aleksei Guzev" <aleksei.guzev@...> 2003/10/02

[#83448] xml in Ruby — paul vudmaska <paul_vudmaska@...> 2003/10/02

The biggest problem i have with Ruby is the sleepness

[#83455] Re: xml in Ruby — Chad Fowler <chad@...> 2003/10/02

On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, paul vudmaska wrote:

[#83464] Re: xml in Ruby or no xml it's just a question — paul vudmaska <paul_vudmaska@...> 2003/10/02

>>--------

[#83470] Re: xml in Ruby — paul vudmaska <paul_vudmaska@...>

>>>

15 messages 2003/10/02

[#83551] xml + ruby — paul vudmaska <paul_vudmaska@...>

>>---------

20 messages 2003/10/03
[#83562] Re: xml + ruby — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2003/10/03

On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 16:11:46 +0900, paul vudmaska wrote:

[#83554] hash of hashes — Paul Argentoff <argentoff@...>

Hi all.

18 messages 2003/10/03

[#83675] fox-tool - interactive gui builder for fxruby — henon <user@...>

hi fellows,

15 messages 2003/10/05

[#83730] Re: Enumerable#inject is surprising me... — "Weirich, James" <James.Weirich@...>

> Does it surprise you?

17 messages 2003/10/06
[#83732] Re: Enumerable#inject is surprising me... — nobu.nokada@... 2003/10/07

Hi,

[#83801] Extension Language for a Text Editor — Nikolai Weibull <ruby-talk@...>

OK. So I'm going to write a text editor for my masters' thesis. The

35 messages 2003/10/08
[#83803] Re: Extension Language for a Text Editor — Ryan Pavlik <rpav@...> 2003/10/08

On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 05:06:32 +0900

[#83806] Re: Extension Language for a Text Editor — Nikolai Weibull <ruby-talk@...> 2003/10/08

* Ryan Pavlik <rpav@mephle.com> [Oct, 08 2003 22:30]:

[#83812] Re: Extension Language for a Text Editor — Ryan Pavlik <rpav@...> 2003/10/08

On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 06:09:29 +0900

[#83955] Re: Extension Language for a Text Editor — Nikolai Weibull <ruby-talk@...> 2003/10/09

* Ryan Pavlik <rpav@mephle.com> [Oct, 09 2003 09:10]:

[#84169] General Ruby Programming questions — Simon Kitching <simon@...>

21 messages 2003/10/15
[#84170] Re: General Ruby Programming questions — Florian Gross <flgr@...> 2003/10/15

Simon Kitching wrote:

[#84172] Re: General Ruby Programming questions — Simon Kitching <simon@...> 2003/10/15

Hi Florian..

[#84331] Re: Email Harvesting — Greg Vaughn <gvaughn@...>

Ryan Dlugosz said:

17 messages 2003/10/21
[#84335] Re: Email Harvesting — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...> 2003/10/21

On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Greg Vaughn wrote:

[#84343] Re: Email Harvesting — Ruben Vandeginste <Ruben.Vandeginste@...> 2003/10/22

On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 08:35:32 +0900, Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng

[#84341] Ruby-oriented Linux distro? — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...>

There's been some talk of something like this in the past.

15 messages 2003/10/22
[#84348] Re: Ruby-oriented Linux distro? — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2003/10/22

On Wednesday, October 22, 2003, 6:01:16 PM, Hal wrote:

[#84351] Re: Ruby-oriented Linux distro? — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...> 2003/10/22

On Wednesday 22 Oct 2003 11:02 am, Gavin Sinclair wrote:

[#84420] Struggling with variable arguments to block — "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair@...>

Hi -talk,

18 messages 2003/10/24
[#84428] Re: Struggling with variable arguments to block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/10/24

Hi,

[#84604] ruby-dev summary 21637-21729 — Takaaki Tateishi <ttate@...>

Hello,

21 messages 2003/10/30
[#84787] Re: ruby-dev summary 21637-21729 — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2003/11/06

On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 07:01:28AM +0900, Takaaki Tateishi wrote:

[#84789] Re: ruby-dev summary 21637-21729 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/11/06

Hi,

[#84792] Re: ruby-dev summary 21637-21729 — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2003/11/06

On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 11:17:59PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#84794] Re: ruby-dev summary 21637-21729 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/11/06

Hi,

Re: TCPSocket delay problem

From: ahoward <ahoward@...>
Date: 2003-10-09 16:54:20 UTC
List: ruby-talk #83939
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

> The only workaround I can think of is to use "resolv-replace", which
> is pure Ruby resolver.  It is not fast at all, but at least other
> thread can work during resolving.  Try putting
>
>   require "resolv-replace"

i see the same problem as seth.  when i run this :

  ruby -r socket -e 'p (Time.now); p (TCPSocket.new %q(ad.doubleclick.net), 80); p (Time.now)

it takes around 20 seconds to run.  so i tried

  strace !! > strace 2>&1

and here is where it got interesting.  looking at the strace file i saw :

  247 socket(PF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 3
  248 connect(3, {sin_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(53), sin_addr=inet_addr("137.75.132.181")}}, 16) = 0
  249 send(3, "\314Q\1\0\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\2ad\vdoubleclick\3net\0"..., 36, 0) = 36
  250 time(NULL)                              = 1046809069

  251 poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}], 1, 5000)  = 0
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
	      THIS TIMED OUT!

  252 close(3)                                = 0

so then tried running

  strace dnsquery ad.doubleclick.net > strace 2>&1

and looking at it's strace, which shows :

  36 socket(PF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 3
  37 connect(3, {sin_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(53), sin_addr=inet_addr("137.75.132.181")}}, 16)         = 0
  38 send(3, "s\332\1\0\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\2ad\vdoubleclick\3net\0"..., 36, 0) = 36
  39 gettimeofday({1046809802, 554050}, NULL) = 0
  40 rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, NULL, [], 8) = 0
  41 select(4, [3], NULL, NULL, {5, 0})      = 1 (in [3], left {4, 950000})
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
	      THIS DID *NOT* TIMED OUT!
  42 rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [], NULL, 8) = 0
  43 recvfrom(3, "s\332\201\200\0\1\0\1\0\4\0\4\2ad\vdoubleclick\3net\0"..., 8192, 0, {sin_family=AF_        INET, sin_port=htons(53), sin_addr=inet_addr("137.75.132.181")}}, [16]) = 206
  44 close(3)                                = 0



so, ruby sends (via syscalls)

  "\314Q\1\0\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\2ad\vdoubleclick\3net\0"

and then polls


while dnsquery sends (via syscalls)

  "s\332\1\0\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\2ad\vdoubleclick\3net\0"

and then selects


the problems is that the poll from ruby times out?!  i don't know much about
dns, and so don't understand the meaning of the queries, but perhaps one is
incorrect?  if not, then this seems like it could only be a bug in poll?

hope this helps.

-a




--
  ====================================
  | Ara Howard
  | NOAA Forecast Systems Laboratory
  | Information and Technology Services
  | Data Systems Group
  | R/FST 325 Broadway
  | Boulder, CO 80305-3328
  | Email: ahoward@fsl.noaa.gov
  | Phone:  303-497-7238
  | Fax:    303-497-7259
  ====================================

In This Thread