From: Albert Chou Date: 2003-10-23T01:59:06+09:00 Subject: Re: weird(?) thought about programming languages This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C398BD.8FD9B9BC Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I remember someone touting REBOL's built-in parsing capability. I have no idea whether it's powerful enough to parse REBOL code itself. Neat thought! Al -----Original Message----- From: Chris Pine [mailto:cpine@hellotree.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 8:05 AM To: ruby-talk ML Subject: Re: weird(?) thought about programming languages If a language included its own parser as an object in the language, then you could do it... in a way, I think. As far as I know, no language goes that far, yet. Chris ------_=_NextPart_001_01C398BD.8FD9B9BC Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable RE: weird(?) thought about programming languages

I remember someone touting REBOL's built-in parsing = capability.  I have no idea whether it's powerful enough to parse = REBOL code itself.

Neat thought!


Al


-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Pine [mailto:cpine@hellotree.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 8:05 AM
To: ruby-talk ML
Subject: Re: weird(?) thought about programming = languages

If a language included its own parser as an object in = the language, then you
could do it... in a way, I think.

As far as I know, no language goes that far, = yet.

Chris

------_=_NextPart_001_01C398BD.8FD9B9BC--