[#83328] tcltklib and not init'ing tk — aakhter@... (Aamer Akhter)

Hello,

13 messages 2003/10/01

[#83391] mixing in class methods — "Mark J. Reed" <markjreed@...>

Okay, probably a dumb question, but: is there any way to define

22 messages 2003/10/01
[#83392] Re: mixing in class methods — Ryan Pavlik <rpav@...> 2003/10/01

On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 06:02:32 +0900

[#83397] Re: mixing in class methods — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2003/10/01

On Thursday, October 2, 2003, 7:08:00 AM, Ryan wrote:

[#83399] Re: mixing in class methods — "Mark J. Reed" <markjreed@...> 2003/10/02

On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 07:37:25AM +0900, Gavin Sinclair wrote:

[#83404] Re: mixing in class methods — "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair@...> 2003/10/02

> On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 07:37:25AM +0900, Gavin Sinclair wrote:

[#83416] C or C++? — "Joe Cheng" <code@...>

I'd like to start writing Ruby extensions. Does it make a difference

32 messages 2003/10/02
[#83435] Re: C or C++? — "Aleksei Guzev" <aleksei.guzev@...> 2003/10/02

[#83448] xml in Ruby — paul vudmaska <paul_vudmaska@...> 2003/10/02

The biggest problem i have with Ruby is the sleepness

[#83455] Re: xml in Ruby — Chad Fowler <chad@...> 2003/10/02

On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, paul vudmaska wrote:

[#83464] Re: xml in Ruby or no xml it's just a question — paul vudmaska <paul_vudmaska@...> 2003/10/02

>>--------

[#83470] Re: xml in Ruby — paul vudmaska <paul_vudmaska@...>

>>>

15 messages 2003/10/02

[#83551] xml + ruby — paul vudmaska <paul_vudmaska@...>

>>---------

20 messages 2003/10/03
[#83562] Re: xml + ruby — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2003/10/03

On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 16:11:46 +0900, paul vudmaska wrote:

[#83554] hash of hashes — Paul Argentoff <argentoff@...>

Hi all.

18 messages 2003/10/03

[#83675] fox-tool - interactive gui builder for fxruby — henon <user@...>

hi fellows,

15 messages 2003/10/05

[#83730] Re: Enumerable#inject is surprising me... — "Weirich, James" <James.Weirich@...>

> Does it surprise you?

17 messages 2003/10/06
[#83732] Re: Enumerable#inject is surprising me... — nobu.nokada@... 2003/10/07

Hi,

[#83801] Extension Language for a Text Editor — Nikolai Weibull <ruby-talk@...>

OK. So I'm going to write a text editor for my masters' thesis. The

35 messages 2003/10/08
[#83803] Re: Extension Language for a Text Editor — Ryan Pavlik <rpav@...> 2003/10/08

On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 05:06:32 +0900

[#83806] Re: Extension Language for a Text Editor — Nikolai Weibull <ruby-talk@...> 2003/10/08

* Ryan Pavlik <rpav@mephle.com> [Oct, 08 2003 22:30]:

[#83812] Re: Extension Language for a Text Editor — Ryan Pavlik <rpav@...> 2003/10/08

On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 06:09:29 +0900

[#83955] Re: Extension Language for a Text Editor — Nikolai Weibull <ruby-talk@...> 2003/10/09

* Ryan Pavlik <rpav@mephle.com> [Oct, 09 2003 09:10]:

[#84169] General Ruby Programming questions — Simon Kitching <simon@...>

21 messages 2003/10/15
[#84170] Re: General Ruby Programming questions — Florian Gross <flgr@...> 2003/10/15

Simon Kitching wrote:

[#84172] Re: General Ruby Programming questions — Simon Kitching <simon@...> 2003/10/15

Hi Florian..

[#84331] Re: Email Harvesting — Greg Vaughn <gvaughn@...>

Ryan Dlugosz said:

17 messages 2003/10/21
[#84335] Re: Email Harvesting — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...> 2003/10/21

On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Greg Vaughn wrote:

[#84343] Re: Email Harvesting — Ruben Vandeginste <Ruben.Vandeginste@...> 2003/10/22

On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 08:35:32 +0900, Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng

[#84341] Ruby-oriented Linux distro? — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...>

There's been some talk of something like this in the past.

15 messages 2003/10/22
[#84348] Re: Ruby-oriented Linux distro? — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2003/10/22

On Wednesday, October 22, 2003, 6:01:16 PM, Hal wrote:

[#84351] Re: Ruby-oriented Linux distro? — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...> 2003/10/22

On Wednesday 22 Oct 2003 11:02 am, Gavin Sinclair wrote:

[#84420] Struggling with variable arguments to block — "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair@...>

Hi -talk,

18 messages 2003/10/24
[#84428] Re: Struggling with variable arguments to block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/10/24

Hi,

[#84604] ruby-dev summary 21637-21729 — Takaaki Tateishi <ttate@...>

Hello,

21 messages 2003/10/30
[#84787] Re: ruby-dev summary 21637-21729 — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2003/11/06

On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 07:01:28AM +0900, Takaaki Tateishi wrote:

[#84789] Re: ruby-dev summary 21637-21729 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/11/06

Hi,

[#84792] Re: ruby-dev summary 21637-21729 — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2003/11/06

On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 11:17:59PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#84794] Re: ruby-dev summary 21637-21729 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/11/06

Hi,

Re: xml in Ruby or no xml it's just a question

From: paul vudmaska <paul_vudmaska@...>
Date: 2003-10-02 16:46:38 UTC
List: ruby-talk #83464
>>--------
 "Chad Fowler" <chad@chadfowler.com>
Pretty much everything you've mentioned here is
possible with REXML 
--------------------<<
Except the style. Besides, that was part of my point.

>>--------
 "Chad Fowler" <chad@chadfowler.com>
I can't see how hard-wiring XML as a part of Ruby's
syntax 
provides much of a benefit at all.  It would be
fashionable (though not 
really all that fashionable these days), but barring
that it's just 
more 
baggage to carry around. 
---------<<
It's interesting to me that you would wrap an xml
file(rss) in an object 
http://www.chadfowler.com/ruby/rss/
but belittle an offhanded attempt to make inherent
those attributes that you so painstakingly crafted
code for and call the former more baggage. Help me
understand that, Chad!


>>--------
 "Chad Fowler" <chad@chadfowler.com>

Interesting in the same way that Lojban is interesting

(http://www.lojban.org). :)
--------------------<<
for you!


>>--------
 "Chad Fowler" <chad@chadfowler.com>

Are we playing sports or writing programming
languages?  I didn't know 
it 
was a competition.  Who are the enemies?  Is anyone on
our team?
--------------------<<

I'm just a simple scriptor making an open ended
suggestion about a language that i enjoy in a forum
that i would hope would encourage such things - even
if they are stupid. What language are you writing,
btw?  Just an analogy, maybe a bad one. Sorry.

>>--------
 "Chad Fowler" <chad@chadfowler.com>
more readable?  

...<list><item>blah</item><item>blah2</item><item>lkjsdf</item></list>

vs. 
["blah", "blah2", "lkjsdf"]
--------------------<<

More readable as in 'more context' not as in more 
succinct or fewer letters or anything else.(ie are
those an array of items in a list or just a lot of
blah?)


>>--------
With REXML in the distribution you can already do
this.  Just requires a few more keystrokes.
-----<
Sure but fewer works for me better.

>>--------
 "Chad Fowler" <chad@chadfowler.com>
Where 
would you rather have coupling?
-----------<<
Where it serves me best. I was merely contemplating
another tool to choose from. I'm not unaware of the
implications.

>>--------
 "Chad Fowler" <chad@chadfowler.com>
No offense intended, but I hope not :)
-----------<<

None taken!

>>--------
"Erik Terpstra" <erik@terpnet.nl>
Last year I made a quick hack that could do something
like that.
I didn't have much experience with Ruby back then, so
it is a quick and 
very dirty solution. But the following works:
---------->

Thanks Erik i'm going to take a look at this and see
if i can use it! I'm still a newbie and will prob
learn a lot from it in any case.

:P



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com

In This Thread