[#83328] tcltklib and not init'ing tk — aakhter@... (Aamer Akhter)

Hello,

13 messages 2003/10/01

[#83391] mixing in class methods — "Mark J. Reed" <markjreed@...>

Okay, probably a dumb question, but: is there any way to define

22 messages 2003/10/01
[#83392] Re: mixing in class methods — Ryan Pavlik <rpav@...> 2003/10/01

On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 06:02:32 +0900

[#83397] Re: mixing in class methods — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2003/10/01

On Thursday, October 2, 2003, 7:08:00 AM, Ryan wrote:

[#83399] Re: mixing in class methods — "Mark J. Reed" <markjreed@...> 2003/10/02

On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 07:37:25AM +0900, Gavin Sinclair wrote:

[#83404] Re: mixing in class methods — "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair@...> 2003/10/02

> On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 07:37:25AM +0900, Gavin Sinclair wrote:

[#83416] C or C++? — "Joe Cheng" <code@...>

I'd like to start writing Ruby extensions. Does it make a difference

32 messages 2003/10/02
[#83435] Re: C or C++? — "Aleksei Guzev" <aleksei.guzev@...> 2003/10/02

[#83448] xml in Ruby — paul vudmaska <paul_vudmaska@...> 2003/10/02

The biggest problem i have with Ruby is the sleepness

[#83455] Re: xml in Ruby — Chad Fowler <chad@...> 2003/10/02

On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, paul vudmaska wrote:

[#83464] Re: xml in Ruby or no xml it's just a question — paul vudmaska <paul_vudmaska@...> 2003/10/02

>>--------

[#83470] Re: xml in Ruby — paul vudmaska <paul_vudmaska@...>

>>>

15 messages 2003/10/02

[#83551] xml + ruby — paul vudmaska <paul_vudmaska@...>

>>---------

20 messages 2003/10/03
[#83562] Re: xml + ruby — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2003/10/03

On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 16:11:46 +0900, paul vudmaska wrote:

[#83554] hash of hashes — Paul Argentoff <argentoff@...>

Hi all.

18 messages 2003/10/03

[#83675] fox-tool - interactive gui builder for fxruby — henon <user@...>

hi fellows,

15 messages 2003/10/05

[#83730] Re: Enumerable#inject is surprising me... — "Weirich, James" <James.Weirich@...>

> Does it surprise you?

17 messages 2003/10/06
[#83732] Re: Enumerable#inject is surprising me... — nobu.nokada@... 2003/10/07

Hi,

[#83801] Extension Language for a Text Editor — Nikolai Weibull <ruby-talk@...>

OK. So I'm going to write a text editor for my masters' thesis. The

35 messages 2003/10/08
[#83803] Re: Extension Language for a Text Editor — Ryan Pavlik <rpav@...> 2003/10/08

On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 05:06:32 +0900

[#83806] Re: Extension Language for a Text Editor — Nikolai Weibull <ruby-talk@...> 2003/10/08

* Ryan Pavlik <rpav@mephle.com> [Oct, 08 2003 22:30]:

[#83812] Re: Extension Language for a Text Editor — Ryan Pavlik <rpav@...> 2003/10/08

On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 06:09:29 +0900

[#83955] Re: Extension Language for a Text Editor — Nikolai Weibull <ruby-talk@...> 2003/10/09

* Ryan Pavlik <rpav@mephle.com> [Oct, 09 2003 09:10]:

[#84169] General Ruby Programming questions — Simon Kitching <simon@...>

21 messages 2003/10/15
[#84170] Re: General Ruby Programming questions — Florian Gross <flgr@...> 2003/10/15

Simon Kitching wrote:

[#84172] Re: General Ruby Programming questions — Simon Kitching <simon@...> 2003/10/15

Hi Florian..

[#84331] Re: Email Harvesting — Greg Vaughn <gvaughn@...>

Ryan Dlugosz said:

17 messages 2003/10/21
[#84335] Re: Email Harvesting — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...> 2003/10/21

On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Greg Vaughn wrote:

[#84343] Re: Email Harvesting — Ruben Vandeginste <Ruben.Vandeginste@...> 2003/10/22

On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 08:35:32 +0900, Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng

[#84341] Ruby-oriented Linux distro? — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...>

There's been some talk of something like this in the past.

15 messages 2003/10/22
[#84348] Re: Ruby-oriented Linux distro? — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2003/10/22

On Wednesday, October 22, 2003, 6:01:16 PM, Hal wrote:

[#84351] Re: Ruby-oriented Linux distro? — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...> 2003/10/22

On Wednesday 22 Oct 2003 11:02 am, Gavin Sinclair wrote:

[#84420] Struggling with variable arguments to block — "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair@...>

Hi -talk,

18 messages 2003/10/24
[#84428] Re: Struggling with variable arguments to block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/10/24

Hi,

[#84604] ruby-dev summary 21637-21729 — Takaaki Tateishi <ttate@...>

Hello,

21 messages 2003/10/30
[#84787] Re: ruby-dev summary 21637-21729 — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2003/11/06

On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 07:01:28AM +0900, Takaaki Tateishi wrote:

[#84789] Re: ruby-dev summary 21637-21729 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/11/06

Hi,

[#84792] Re: ruby-dev summary 21637-21729 — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2003/11/06

On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 11:17:59PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#84794] Re: ruby-dev summary 21637-21729 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/11/06

Hi,

ruby-dev summary 21403-21530

From: Minero Aoki <aamine@...>
Date: 2003-10-08 21:40:41 UTC
List: ruby-talk #83809
Hi all,

This is a summary of ruby-dev ML in these days.

[ruby-dev:21416] return value of #warn

  In current 1.8, #warn returns its argument.  U.Nakamura
  reported that #warn returns undetermined value on -W0.
  The return value was fixed to nil.

[ruby-dev:21176] marshalling ivtbl of Time

  In old 1.8, ruby did not dump instance variables if #_dump or
  #marshal_dump is defined.  Almost all built-in classes do not
  have #_dump/#marshal_dump, except the Time class (it has #_dump).
  So instance variables of Time objects will not be dumped. e.g.

    % ruby -ve '
        t = Time.now
        t.instance_eval { @ivar = 3 }
        Marshal.load(Marshal.dump(t)).instance_eval { p @ivar }
    '
    ruby 1.8.0 (2003-08-10) [i686-linux]    # != 1.8.0 release (2003-08-04)
    -e:3: warning: instance variable @ivar not initialized
    nil

  Matz decided to dump/restore instance variables automatically,
  even if #_dump/#marshal_dump is defined.  But it causes needless
  errors when trying to dump objects which include unserializable
  objects, e.g. IO.  Then if an object has #_dump/#marshal_dump
  and meets unserializable objects, ruby will not raise exception,
  just ignore it.  See following example for changes.

    % cat marshal_io
    class C
      def initialize
	@io = STDIN
	@n = 99
      end
      def marshal_dump
	3
      end
      def marshal_load( obj )
	@io = STDIN
      end
    end
    c = C.new
    p c
    p Marshal.load(Marshal.dump(c))


    % ruby-1.8.0 marshal_io
    #<C:0x401ace1c @io=#<IO:0x401b3280>, @n=99>
    #<C:0x401accc8 @io=#<IO:0x401b3280>>      # @n is not restored

    % ruby-HEAD marshal_io
    #<C:0x40270e1c @n=99, @io=#<IO:0x40277294>>
    #<C:0x40270cc8 @n=99, @io=#<IO:0x40277294>>

[ruby-dev:21498] {test,lib}/ChangeLog?

  Now ChangeLog file contains ruby's whole changes, including
  test/*, lib/*, ext/*, etc.  But there are other schemes of logging,
  e.g. one file per one directory.  NAKAMURA Hiroshi asked what our
  scheme should be; where to log for test scripts, for example.

  Matz replied that he prefers one ChangeLog file.

[ruby-dev:21508] eval BEGIN/END at runtime

  NAKAMURA Hiroshi asked how appropriate is current BEGIN/END block
  behavior.  See following script:

    eval 'BEGIN { puts "begin" }
          END { puts "end" }'
    puts '----'

  Ruby prints "begin", "----", then "end".  So, when we execute
  BEGIN/END in eval, BEGIN block is executed at the beginning of
  eval, END block is executed at the end of ruby process.

  Matz replied that this is a feature.


-- Minero Aoki

In This Thread

Prev Next