From: Zach Dennis <zdennis@...>
Date: 2003-10-04T03:03:55+09:00
Subject: Re: xml + ruby

James,

Are the people on this thread suffering from a case
of programmatic idealism, underuse or misuse of rexml
or is rexml lacking some of the things mentioned on
this thread?

I've been humming a pretty tune, but in all honesty
I have hardly used rexml as of yet, since this is
my first weeks arrival into Ruby. So please point
me and others in the right direction, then maybe this 
thread can be redirected to point to what maybe
rexml is lacking and how to better improve on it.

-Zach

-----Original Message-----
From: James Britt [mailto:jamesUNDERBARb@seemyemail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 1:45 PM
To: ruby-talk ML
Subject: Re: xml + ruby


Zach Dennis wrote:
> 
> 
> For Ruby to have a well structured and defined( and accessible )
> XML object is not that far out there. 

True enough; in fact, you need only do this:

require 'rexml/document'


James