From: Chris Morris <chrismo@...>
Date: 2003-10-03T02:41:15+09:00
Subject: Re: xml in Ruby

paul vudmaska wrote:

>for my third cent, the above syntax 'just makes since'
>to me. What could be more semantic than employee.name
>without resorting to write your own class/accessors
>for it? What's wrong with that being a fundamental
>data acess fascility? call me crazy
>
The point of contention seems to be whether or not this is included in 
the core language vs. a library, right? How does the Ruby community as a 
whole benefit from core inclusion? What's not satisfying to you about 
this solution being contained in a library?

-- 

Chris
http://clabs.org/blogki