[#398788] Constructor or a Method — Rubyist Rohit <lists@...>

Take for instance this code:

13 messages 2012/09/01

[#398896] how to sum element of array — Edward QU <lists@...>

dear all

19 messages 2012/09/04

[#398936] best coding for limiting a value — Regis d'Aubarede <lists@...>

A) result=value<min ? min : (value > max ? max : value)

17 messages 2012/09/04

[#398962] Long calculation & time limit — toto tartemolle <lists@...>

Hello,

17 messages 2012/09/05

[#398997] OpenURI open method problem — "Derek T." <lists@...>

The code I am referring to looks like this:

12 messages 2012/09/05

[#399002] Parsing through downloaded html — Sybren Kooistra <lists@...>

Hi all,

28 messages 2012/09/06

[#399012] "Hiding" pictures(and source code if it's possible) — "Damián M. González" <lists@...>

Ey guys, how are you?

11 messages 2012/09/06

[#399083] regix in grep or something like this — Ferdous ara <lists@...>

Hi

12 messages 2012/09/07

[#399206] please help me with making script — Charmaine Willemsen <lists@...>

In this example i like to parse birthday and sexe

11 messages 2012/09/11

[#399218] Pathname#to_str withdrawn in 1.9? — matt@... (Matt Neuburg)

Just getting started experimenting with Ruby 1.9 (1.9.3) and my scripts

13 messages 2012/09/12

[#399227] Breaking Down the Block — incag neato <lists@...>

Can someone please explain in plain english how this block treats the

20 messages 2012/09/13

[#399244] ruby Range to array that acts like time objects? — "Jermaine O." <lists@...>

Hello everybody,

15 messages 2012/09/13

[#399293] Ruby on Ubuntu 12.04 LST — Bojan Jordanovski <lists@...>

Hello everybody,

13 messages 2012/09/14

[#399298] wow, YAML / Psych in 1.9.3 is *slow*! — matt@... (Matt Neuburg)

I just started trying Ruby 1.9.3, coming from Ruby 1.8.7, and was

12 messages 2012/09/14

[#399304] Ruby 1.9.3 and OS X Mountain Lion — sto.mar@...

Hi all,

16 messages 2012/09/14

[#399343] Class variables or Class singleton variables? — "Damián M. González" <lists@...>

Guys, how are you?

18 messages 2012/09/15

[#399386] Ruby - is it worth the effort? — neomex <neomex@...>

Hello,

19 messages 2012/09/17
[#399406] Re: Ruby - is it worth the effort? — Roger Pack <lists@...> 2012/09/17

Unfortunately with Ruby for me it's typically "fun and fast development"

[#399409] Re: Ruby - is it worth the effort? — Peter Zotov <whitequark@...> 2012/09/17

Roger Pack писал 17.09.2012 22:06:

[#399491] Re: Ruby - is it worth the effort? — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2012/09/19

On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Peter Zotov <whitequark@whitequark.org> wrote:

[#399421] Encoding question — Thomas Bednarz <lists@...>

I am new to ruby and play around with it a little bit at the moment. I

17 messages 2012/09/17

[#399441] Bug or feature — Damjan Rems <lists@...>

There has probably been some discussion about this problem so sorry if I

13 messages 2012/09/18

[#399451] Class variables — Aleksander Ciesielski <neomex@...>

Is it obligatory to use instance variables in classes? Can't we just

17 messages 2012/09/18

[#399479] Ruby SQL Select Sum 2 Columns? — Courtney Fay <lists@...>

I have the following definition which is looking at an apache database,

12 messages 2012/09/18

[#399556] still learning by doing - connecting rooms in a game — "Sebastjan H." <lists@...>

Hi,

28 messages 2012/09/20
[#399570] Re: still learning by doing - connecting rooms in a game — Henry Maddocks <hmaddocks@...> 2012/09/20

[#399574] Re: still learning by doing - connecting rooms in a game — "Sebastjan H." <lists@...> 2012/09/21

Henry Maddocks wrote in post #1076876:

[#399575] Re: still learning by doing - connecting rooms in a game — Henry Maddocks <hmaddocks@...> 2012/09/21

[#399576] Re: still learning by doing - connecting rooms in a game — "Sebastjan H." <lists@...> 2012/09/21

Could you be so kind as to suggest another book? I mean there are many

[#399585] Re: still learning by doing - connecting rooms in a game — "Sebastjan H." <lists@...> 2012/09/21

Sebastjan H. wrote in post #1076909:

[#399572] How would you allow variable from specific list of Fixnum? — Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer@...>

I have:

11 messages 2012/09/21

[#399623] Very important question - survey — Marc Heiler <lists@...>

Is matz more like a ninja or more like a samurai?

11 messages 2012/09/22

[#399695] inject problem — Roelof Wobben <rwobben@...>

26 messages 2012/09/25

[#399714] could initialize return an existing object instead of a new instance? — Gary Weaver <lists@...>

Is it possible for initialize to return an existing object instead of a

9 messages 2012/09/25

[#399811] Good book for getting started with Ruby? [I code Python!] — Alec Taylor <alec.taylor6@...>

I've learned programming in C++, Python and PHP at University. (also

12 messages 2012/09/28

[#399815] calcaulation with unknown numbers of numbers and options fail — Roelof Wobben <rwobben@...>

11 messages 2012/09/28

Re: ibonacci sequence problem

From: Roelof Wobben <rwobben@...>
Date: 2012-09-29 08:02:45 UTC
List: ruby-talk #399854
Thanks, 

I think learning to programm is difficult without a sort of teacher. You never get checked if you are doing it the ruby way.
I'm now reading the Well Grounded Rubyist

But that one is without exercises so I can never check if I really understand it.
And the best way for me to learn something is to do it and not only to read about it.

Roelof
 


> Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 10:48:58 +0900
> From: lists@ruby-forum.com
> Subject: Re: ibonacci sequence problem
> To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Roelof Wobben wrote in post #1077938:
> > By considering the terms in the Fibonacci sequence whose values do not
> > exceed four million, find the sum of the even-valued terms.
> 
> The problem is that you (unintentionally) start the sum with 1 instead 
> of 0. When you don't set a start value for inject, the aggregate value 
> is set to the first element. In this case it's 1, so the result will be 
> 1 too big.
> 
> Also your code is rather "naive" in the sense that you're treating the 
> numbers as if they were physical objects and actually need to be 
> collected. This is very inefficient and completely unnessary. You only 
> need to track the last two numbers.
> 
> You should also get rid of some habits you seem to have adopted from 
> other programming languages (like Java or so). Things like "Array.new 
> [1,2]" and "number % 2 == 0" are useless in Ruby. The literal "[1,2]" 
> already *is* an array. And checking if an integer is even can be done by 
> simply calling "even?".
> 
> A low-level solution might look something like this:
> 
> previous, current =
>   0, 1
> sum = 0
> while current <= 4_000_000
>   sum += current if current.even?
>   previous, current =
>     current, previous + current
> end
> puts sum
> 
> A more high-level approach could consist of defining an Enumerator for 
> the fibonacci sequence and then apply "take_while", "select" and 
> "reduce" subsequently:
> 
> fibonacci = Enumerator.new do |yielder|
>   previous, current =
>     0, 1
>   yielder << previous << current
>   loop do
>     previous, current =
>       current, previous + current
>     yielder << current
>   end
> end
> 
> sum = fibonacci.take_while{|e| e <= 4_000_000}.select(&:even?).reduce :+
> puts sum
> 
> This actually works similar to your code, so it's not efficient. But 
> it's very readable and kind of "the Ruby way".
> 
> -- 
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
> 
 		 	   		  

In This Thread