[#398788] Constructor or a Method — Rubyist Rohit <lists@...>

Take for instance this code:

13 messages 2012/09/01

[#398896] how to sum element of array — Edward QU <lists@...>

dear all

19 messages 2012/09/04

[#398936] best coding for limiting a value — Regis d'Aubarede <lists@...>

A) result=value<min ? min : (value > max ? max : value)

17 messages 2012/09/04

[#398962] Long calculation & time limit — toto tartemolle <lists@...>

Hello,

17 messages 2012/09/05

[#398964] Compiling ruby from source on windows — GPad <peterpan105105@...>

Hi to all,=0AI'm trying to compile ruby on my windows 7. I have already a r=

10 messages 2012/09/05

[#398997] OpenURI open method problem — "Derek T." <lists@...>

The code I am referring to looks like this:

12 messages 2012/09/05

[#399002] Parsing through downloaded html — Sybren Kooistra <lists@...>

Hi all,

28 messages 2012/09/06

[#399012] "Hiding" pictures(and source code if it's possible) — "Damián M. González" <lists@...>

Ey guys, how are you?

11 messages 2012/09/06

[#399083] regix in grep or something like this — Ferdous ara <lists@...>

Hi

12 messages 2012/09/07

[#399206] please help me with making script — Charmaine Willemsen <lists@...>

In this example i like to parse birthday and sexe

11 messages 2012/09/11

[#399218] Pathname#to_str withdrawn in 1.9? — matt@... (Matt Neuburg)

Just getting started experimenting with Ruby 1.9 (1.9.3) and my scripts

13 messages 2012/09/12

[#399227] Breaking Down the Block — incag neato <lists@...>

Can someone please explain in plain english how this block treats the

20 messages 2012/09/13

[#399244] ruby Range to array that acts like time objects? — "Jermaine O." <lists@...>

Hello everybody,

15 messages 2012/09/13

[#399293] Ruby on Ubuntu 12.04 LST — Bojan Jordanovski <lists@...>

Hello everybody,

13 messages 2012/09/14

[#399298] wow, YAML / Psych in 1.9.3 is *slow*! — matt@... (Matt Neuburg)

I just started trying Ruby 1.9.3, coming from Ruby 1.8.7, and was

12 messages 2012/09/14

[#399304] Ruby 1.9.3 and OS X Mountain Lion — sto.mar@...

Hi all,

16 messages 2012/09/14

[#399343] Class variables or Class singleton variables? — "Damián M. González" <lists@...>

Guys, how are you?

18 messages 2012/09/15

[#399386] Ruby - is it worth the effort? — neomex <neomex@...>

Hello,

19 messages 2012/09/17
[#399406] Re: Ruby - is it worth the effort? — Roger Pack <lists@...> 2012/09/17

Unfortunately with Ruby for me it's typically "fun and fast development"

[#399409] Re: Ruby - is it worth the effort? — Peter Zotov <whitequark@...> 2012/09/17

Roger Pack писал 17.09.2012 22:06:

[#399491] Re: Ruby - is it worth the effort? — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2012/09/19

On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Peter Zotov <whitequark@whitequark.org> wr=

[#399421] Encoding question — Thomas Bednarz <lists@...>

I am new to ruby and play around with it a little bit at the moment. I

17 messages 2012/09/17

[#399441] Bug or feature — Damjan Rems <lists@...>

There has probably been some discussion about this problem so sorry if I

13 messages 2012/09/18

[#399451] Class variables — Aleksander Ciesielski <neomex@...>

Is it obligatory to use instance variables in classes? Can't we just

17 messages 2012/09/18

[#399479] Ruby SQL Select Sum 2 Columns? — Courtney Fay <lists@...>

I have the following definition which is looking at an apache database,

12 messages 2012/09/18

[#399556] still learning by doing - connecting rooms in a game — "Sebastjan H." <lists@...>

Hi,

28 messages 2012/09/20
[#399570] Re: still learning by doing - connecting rooms in a game — Henry Maddocks <hmaddocks@...> 2012/09/20

[#399574] Re: still learning by doing - connecting rooms in a game — "Sebastjan H." <lists@...> 2012/09/21

Henry Maddocks wrote in post #1076876:

[#399575] Re: still learning by doing - connecting rooms in a game — Henry Maddocks <hmaddocks@...> 2012/09/21

[#399576] Re: still learning by doing - connecting rooms in a game — "Sebastjan H." <lists@...> 2012/09/21

Could you be so kind as to suggest another book? I mean there are many

[#399585] Re: still learning by doing - connecting rooms in a game — "Sebastjan H." <lists@...> 2012/09/21

Sebastjan H. wrote in post #1076909:

[#399572] How would you allow variable from specific list of Fixnum? — Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer@...>

I have:

11 messages 2012/09/21

[#399623] Very important question - survey — Marc Heiler <lists@...>

Is matz more like a ninja or more like a samurai?

11 messages 2012/09/22

[#399695] inject problem — Roelof Wobben <rwobben@...>

26 messages 2012/09/25

[#399714] could initialize return an existing object instead of a new instance? — Gary Weaver <lists@...>

Is it possible for initialize to return an existing object instead of a

9 messages 2012/09/25

[#399811] Good book for getting started with Ruby? [I code Python!] — Alec Taylor <alec.taylor6@...>

I've learned programming in C++, Python and PHP at University. (also

12 messages 2012/09/28

[#399815] calcaulation with unknown numbers of numbers and options fail — Roelof Wobben <rwobben@...>

11 messages 2012/09/28

[ANN] celluloid 0.12.0: concurrent objects for Ruby (with IO and ZMQ too!)

From: Tony Arcieri <tony.arcieri@...>
Date: 2012-09-04 17:17:03 UTC
List: ruby-talk #398925
Celluloid is a concurrent object oriented programming framework for
Ruby based on the actor model:

http://celluloid.io

Celluloid 0.12.0 is one of the biggest releases of Celluloid ever,
packed with bugfixes and new features.

The biggest change is a new syntax for asynchronous methods and
futures. Celluloid previously used "mymethod!" predicate syntax to
differentiate asynchronous method calls from synchronous method calls.
This was by far the most complained about aspect of Celluloid. That
said, I am officially deprecating this syntax and it will be removed
in Celluloid 1.0. There aren't any deprecation warnings yet but expect
them in the next release (which will hopefully be the last before
1.0).

The new syntax is as follows:

- Sync: actor.mymethod
- Async: actor.async.mymethod
- Future: actor.future.mymethod

Calling async or future without any arguments returns a separate proxy
object which makes all calls to it async or futures accordingly.
Similarly, an "async" method is available inside an actor if you want
to defer work (i.e. where you used "run!" previously just use
"async.run")

Calling async or future with arguments still provides (and will
continue to provide) the original send-like syntax.

Once the original predicate syntax is removed in Celluloid 1.0, bang
methods on actors will be available for you to use again.

--

Full changelog follows:

* Alternative async syntax: actor.async.method in lieu of
actor.method! Original syntax still available but will be removed in
Celluloid 1.0
* Alternative future syntax: actor.future.method in lieu of future(:method)
* All methods in the Celluloid module are now available on its singleton
* The #join and #kill methods are no longer available on the actor
proxy. Please use Celluloid::Actor.join(actor) and .kill(actor)
instead.
* Celluloid::Future#ready? can be used to query for future readiness
* Celluloid::Group constant removed. Please use Celluloid::SupervisionGroup
* #monitor, #unmonitor, and #monitoring? provide unidirectional linking
* Linking is now performed via a SystemEvent
* SystemEvents are no longer exceptions. Boo exceptions as flow control!
* Celluloid::Mailbox#system_event eliminated and replaced with
Mailbox#<< SystemEvents are now automatically high priority
* The task_class class method can be used to override the class used
for tasks, allowing different task implementations to be configured on
an actor-by-actor-basis
* Celluloid::TaskThread provides tasks backed by Threads instead of Fibers
* ActorProxy is now a BasicObject
* A bug prevented Celluloid subclasses from retaining custom mailboxes
defined by use_mailbox. This is now fixed.
* exclusive class method without arguments makes the whole actor exclusive

--
Tony Arcieri

In This Thread

Prev Next