[#393742] Getting the class of an object. — Ralph Shnelvar <ralphs@...32.com>

Consider;

14 messages 2012/03/06

[#393815] arcadia IDE requires tcl/tk and ruby-tk — Thufir Hawat <hawat.thufir@...>

which or where tcl and tk does arcadia require? Is this a gem which I

13 messages 2012/03/13

[#393952] What’s the best way to check if a feature/class has been loaded? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>

Hi!

18 messages 2012/03/21
[#393953] Re: What’s the best way to check if a feature/class has been loaded? — Xavier Noria <fxn@...> 2012/03/21

Active Support has recently added qualified_const_* methods to Module

[#393954] Re: What’s the best way to check if a feature/class has been loaded? — Xavier Noria <fxn@...> 2012/03/21

Ah, that won't work in 1.8.

[#393959] Re: What’s the best way to check if a feature/class has been loaded? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2012/03/21

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 16:43, Xavier Noria <fxn@hashref.com> wrote:

[#393960] Re: What’s the best way to check if a feature/class has been loaded? — Xavier Noria <fxn@...> 2012/03/21

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:

[#393961] Re: What’s the best way to check if a feature/class has been loaded? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2012/03/21

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 20:48, Xavier Noria <fxn@hashref.com> wrote:

[#393962] Re: What’s the best way to check if a feature/class has been loaded? — Xavier Noria <fxn@...> 2012/03/21

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:

[#393967] Re: What’s the best way to check if a feature/class has been loaded? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2012/03/22

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 22:11, Xavier Noria <fxn@hashref.com> wrote:

[#393969] Re: What’s the best way to check if a feature/class has been loaded? — Xavier Noria <fxn@...> 2012/03/22

On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:

[#394154] uninitialized constant SOCKSSocket — Resident Moron <lists@...>

I am running ruby 1.9.3 on a linux box. I would like to use

10 messages 2012/03/29

[#394160] Why z = Complex(1,2) rather than z = Complex.new(1,2)? — Ori Ben-Dor <lists@...>

What's this syntax, z = Complex(1,2), as opposed to z =

14 messages 2012/03/29

[#394175] shoes no such file to load -- rubygems — Mr theperson <lists@...>

I have installed shoes to develop GUI applications but when I try and

13 messages 2012/03/29

[#394201] Can't open url with a subdomain with an underscore — Jeroen van Ingen <lists@...>

I try to open the following URL: http://auto_diversen.marktplaza.nl/

10 messages 2012/03/30

[#394222] Ruby openssl ECC help plz — no name <lists@...>

I am confused on how to properly export public ECC key. I can see it

13 messages 2012/03/31

Re: Why z = Complex(1,2) rather than z = Complex.new(1,2)?

From: "andrea" <andrea@...>
Date: 2012-03-29 14:11:33 UTC
List: ruby-talk #394164
I'd add that, while this works, you better have a very good reason for do=
ing so - it breaks convention.=0A=C2=A0=0A--=0A=C2=A0=0Ahttp://usingimho.=
wordpress.com=0Ahttp://github.com/bolthar=0ADa: "Jan E." lists@ruby-forum=
.com=0AA: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org=0ACc: =0AData: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 23:00:5=
7 +0900=0AOggetto: Re: Why z =3D Complex(1,2) rather than z =3D Complex.n=
ew(1,2)?=0A=0A> Hi,=0A> =0A> You *can* define upper-case methods, but whe=
n you call them, you always =0A> have to use parenthesis so that Ruby doe=
sn't confuse them with =0A> constants:=0A> =0A> ####=0A> def Hallo=0A>   =
puts 'Hallo Welt!'=0A> end=0A> =0A> Hallo()=0A> ####=0A> =0A> However, th=
is violates the naming conventions of Ruby, so you shouldn't =0A> do it. =
Why not define a [] method?=0A> =0A> ####=0A> class MyClass=0A>   def ini=
tialize value=0A>     @value =3D value=0A>   end=0A>   attr_reader :value=
=0A>   def self.[] value=0A>     new value=0A>   end=0A> end=0A> =0A> a =3D=
 MyClass[4]=0A> puts a.value=0A> ####=0A> =0A> -- =0A> Posted via http://=
www.ruby-forum.com/.=0A> 

In This Thread