[#393742] Getting the class of an object. — Ralph Shnelvar <ralphs@...32.com>

Consider;

14 messages 2012/03/06

[#393815] arcadia IDE requires tcl/tk and ruby-tk — Thufir Hawat <hawat.thufir@...>

which or where tcl and tk does arcadia require? Is this a gem which I

13 messages 2012/03/13

[#393952] What’s the best way to check if a feature/class has been loaded? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>

Hi!

18 messages 2012/03/21
[#393953] Re: What’s the best way to check if a feature/class has been loaded? — Xavier Noria <fxn@...> 2012/03/21

Active Support has recently added qualified_const_* methods to Module

[#393954] Re: What’s the best way to check if a feature/class has been loaded? — Xavier Noria <fxn@...> 2012/03/21

Ah, that won't work in 1.8.

[#393959] Re: What’s the best way to check if a feature/class has been loaded? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2012/03/21

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 16:43, Xavier Noria <fxn@hashref.com> wrote:

[#393960] Re: What’s the best way to check if a feature/class has been loaded? — Xavier Noria <fxn@...> 2012/03/21

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:

[#393961] Re: What’s the best way to check if a feature/class has been loaded? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2012/03/21

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 20:48, Xavier Noria <fxn@hashref.com> wrote:

[#393962] Re: What’s the best way to check if a feature/class has been loaded? — Xavier Noria <fxn@...> 2012/03/21

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:

[#393967] Re: What’s the best way to check if a feature/class has been loaded? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2012/03/22

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 22:11, Xavier Noria <fxn@hashref.com> wrote:

[#393969] Re: What’s the best way to check if a feature/class has been loaded? — Xavier Noria <fxn@...> 2012/03/22

On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:

[#394154] uninitialized constant SOCKSSocket — Resident Moron <lists@...>

I am running ruby 1.9.3 on a linux box. I would like to use

10 messages 2012/03/29

[#394160] Why z = Complex(1,2) rather than z = Complex.new(1,2)? — Ori Ben-Dor <lists@...>

What's this syntax, z = Complex(1,2), as opposed to z =

14 messages 2012/03/29

[#394175] shoes no such file to load -- rubygems — Mr theperson <lists@...>

I have installed shoes to develop GUI applications but when I try and

13 messages 2012/03/29

[#394201] Can't open url with a subdomain with an underscore — Jeroen van Ingen <lists@...>

I try to open the following URL: http://auto_diversen.marktplaza.nl/

10 messages 2012/03/30

[#394222] Ruby openssl ECC help plz — no name <lists@...>

I am confused on how to properly export public ECC key. I can see it

13 messages 2012/03/31

Re: in > comparison of fixnum with nil failed, what's wrong with my code?

From: Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...>
Date: 2012-03-09 11:50:03 UTC
List: ruby-talk #393790
Samuel Mensah wrote in post #1050813:
> I'm trying to write a code which tells me the number of inverted pairs
> in an array of numbers so that an array like [4,9,6,3,7] will have 9,6
> as one inversion, 6,3 as another inversion, but 4,9 won't be inverted
> cos when counting from 1 to infinity, 4 comes before 9...

Do you also want to count 9,3 or only adjacent pairs?  From your code it 
seems you want to look at all pairs a[i], a[j] where j > i.

> my code gives
> me the error of "6:in '>': Comparison of Fixnum with nil failed
> (ArgumentError) and here's the code
>
> 1   array=[8,4,2,5,6,9,7,1,3,10]
> 2   startnum=0
> 3   nextnum=1
> 4   count=0
> 5     while array[startnum] != array[8]

That's a weak comparison: better compare startnum with array.size. 
Also, why do you use a constant here?

> 6       if array[startnum] > array[nextnum]
> 7          count=count+1
> 8          nextnum=nextnum+1
> 9            if array[nextnum] == array[9]

Same here: no constant and compare array indexes not array contents.

> 10               startnum=startnum+1
> 11               nextnum=startnum+1
> 12           end
> 13      else
> 14         nextnum=nextnum+1
> 15         if array[nextnum] == array[9]

Again: no constant and compare array indexes not array contents.

> 16             startnum=startnum+1
> 17         end
> 18      end
> 19   end
> 20
> 21   puts count
>
> how do I fix this?

You need to make sure that you do not index outside the valid range. 
With a setup like this always compare indexes with array size and not 
contents of the array.

I have attached a few solutions for both cases.

Kind regards

robert

Attachments:
http://www.ruby-forum.com/attachment/7140/cnt.rb


-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

In This Thread

Prev Next