From: Intransition <transfire@...>
Date: 2012-03-19T12:16:40+09:00
Subject: Re: why no decreasing enumerations?

------=_Part_4412_23538878.1332126997879
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_4413_11184681.1332126997879"

------=_Part_4413_11184681.1332126997879
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



On Sunday, March 18, 2012 5:15:51 PM UTC-4, Chad Perrin wrote:
>
>
> Shouldn't that be #prec (precede/succeed, or precessive/successive)
> rather than #pred?
>
I always thought of it as "predecessor/successor".


------=_Part_4413_11184681.1332126997879
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<br><br>On Sunday, March 18, 2012 5:15:51 PM UTC-4, Chad Perrin wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0;margin-left: 0.8ex;border-left: 1px #ccc solid;padding-left: 1ex;"><br><p>Shouldn't that be #prec (precede/succeed, or precessive/successive)<br>rather than #pred?</p></blockquote>I always thought of it as "predecessor/successor".<br><br>
------=_Part_4413_11184681.1332126997879--

------=_Part_4412_23538878.1332126997879--