[#393742] Getting the class of an object. — Ralph Shnelvar <ralphs@...32.com>

Consider;

14 messages 2012/03/06

[#393815] arcadia IDE requires tcl/tk and ruby-tk — Thufir Hawat <hawat.thufir@...>

which or where tcl and tk does arcadia require? Is this a gem which I

13 messages 2012/03/13

[#393952] What’s the best way to check if a feature/class has been loaded? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>

Hi!

18 messages 2012/03/21
[#393953] Re: What’s the best way to check if a feature/class has been loaded? — Xavier Noria <fxn@...> 2012/03/21

Active Support has recently added qualified_const_* methods to Module

[#393954] Re: What’s the best way to check if a feature/class has been loaded? — Xavier Noria <fxn@...> 2012/03/21

Ah, that won't work in 1.8.

[#393959] Re: What’s the best way to check if a feature/class has been loaded? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2012/03/21

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 16:43, Xavier Noria <fxn@hashref.com> wrote:

[#393960] Re: What’s the best way to check if a feature/class has been loaded? — Xavier Noria <fxn@...> 2012/03/21

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:

[#393961] Re: What’s the best way to check if a feature/class has been loaded? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2012/03/21

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 20:48, Xavier Noria <fxn@hashref.com> wrote:

[#393962] Re: What’s the best way to check if a feature/class has been loaded? — Xavier Noria <fxn@...> 2012/03/21

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:

[#393967] Re: What’s the best way to check if a feature/class has been loaded? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2012/03/22

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 22:11, Xavier Noria <fxn@hashref.com> wrote:

[#393969] Re: What’s the best way to check if a feature/class has been loaded? — Xavier Noria <fxn@...> 2012/03/22

On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:

[#394154] uninitialized constant SOCKSSocket — Resident Moron <lists@...>

I am running ruby 1.9.3 on a linux box. I would like to use

10 messages 2012/03/29

[#394160] Why z = Complex(1,2) rather than z = Complex.new(1,2)? — Ori Ben-Dor <lists@...>

What's this syntax, z = Complex(1,2), as opposed to z =

14 messages 2012/03/29

[#394175] shoes no such file to load -- rubygems — Mr theperson <lists@...>

I have installed shoes to develop GUI applications but when I try and

13 messages 2012/03/29

[#394201] Can't open url with a subdomain with an underscore — Jeroen van Ingen <lists@...>

I try to open the following URL: http://auto_diversen.marktplaza.nl/

10 messages 2012/03/30

[#394222] Ruby openssl ECC help plz — no name <lists@...>

I am confused on how to properly export public ECC key. I can see it

13 messages 2012/03/31

Re: Configuration Convention

From: Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...>
Date: 2012-03-06 16:02:42 UTC
List: ruby-talk #393739
Thomas Sawyer wrote in post #1050299:
> Now, obviously not all of these will apply to every project. But I can
> imagine that given enough time and a rather thorough developer, a
> project could acquire configurations for a couple dozen tools. Think
> code
> coverage, code analysis, IDE/RAD configuration, etc. I suspect there is
> a
> saturation point --at some point it just becomes too much to remember.

Why remember?  Files are in the file system or VCS repository where you
can find them.  I am not sure I understand the issue you are having.

> Even
> so, it could amount to quite a few files, well exceeding the number of
> toplevel "meat" files of a project.

I don't see why this should be a problem.  Even more so: why are these
configuration files not "meat"?  That would mean you could have the
project without them and not lose anything.  I doubt that.  Reminds me
of people coming out of a meeting and saying "now off to some _real_
work" - that's just nonsense as communication is a large part of our
profession - as much as hacking.

> While there are obviously some files that will always remain (e.g.
> .git), I
> wonder if it is possible for a convention to ever develop to mitigate
> all
> this. Most likely that would be in the form of a common directory to
> hold
> all these files, although conceivably, it could be in the form of a
> couple
> of shared files --one for Ruby code and one for YAML.

That directory does exist already - as your posting proves: it's the
project's root directory. :-)

Kind regards

robert

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

In This Thread