From: Gavin Sinclair Date: 2012-03-10T13:20:43+09:00 Subject: Re: Configuration Convention --0023544708e4fb37b604badbd42b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Intransition wrote: > While there are obviously some files that will always remain (e.g. .git), > I wonder if it is possible for a convention to ever develop to mitigate all > this. Most likely that would be in the form of a common directory to hold > all these files, although conceivably, it could be in the form of a couple > of shared files --one for Ruby code and one for YAML. > I agree. It's insane not to have all configuration files in a "config" directory. But you can understand how it's evolved, and sadly it's not going to change. Gavin --0023544708e4fb37b604badbd42b Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Intransition <transfire@gmail.c= om> wrote:
While there are obviously some files that will always remain (e.g. .gi= t), I wonder if it is possible for a convention to ever develop to mitigate= all this. Most likely that would be in the form of a common directory to h= old all these files, although conceivably, it could be in the form of a cou= ple of shared files --one for Ruby code and one for YAML.

I agree. =A0It's insane not to h= ave all configuration files in a "config" directory. =A0But you c= an understand how it's evolved, and sadly it's not going to change.=

Gavin
--0023544708e4fb37b604badbd42b--