From: Chad Perrin <code@...>
Date: 2012-03-20T00:41:08+09:00
Subject: Re: why no decreasing enumerations?

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:16:40PM +0900, Intransition wrote:
> On Sunday, March 18, 2012 5:15:51 PM UTC-4, Chad Perrin wrote:
> >
> > Shouldn't that be #prec (precede/succeed, or precessive/successive)
> > rather than #pred?
> >
> I always thought of it as "predecessor/successor".

To me, that implies that there is only one successor, but I don't know
what the person who named the method thinks about it.

-- 
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]