[#393742] Getting the class of an object. — Ralph Shnelvar <ralphs@...32.com>

Consider;

14 messages 2012/03/06

[#393815] arcadia IDE requires tcl/tk and ruby-tk — Thufir Hawat <hawat.thufir@...>

which or where tcl and tk does arcadia require? Is this a gem which I

13 messages 2012/03/13

[#393952] What’s the best way to check if a feature/class has been loaded? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>

Hi!

18 messages 2012/03/21
[#393953] Re: What’s the best way to check if a feature/class has been loaded? — Xavier Noria <fxn@...> 2012/03/21

Active Support has recently added qualified_const_* methods to Module

[#393954] Re: What’s the best way to check if a feature/class has been loaded? — Xavier Noria <fxn@...> 2012/03/21

Ah, that won't work in 1.8.

[#393959] Re: What’s the best way to check if a feature/class has been loaded? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2012/03/21

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 16:43, Xavier Noria <fxn@hashref.com> wrote:

[#393960] Re: What’s the best way to check if a feature/class has been loaded? — Xavier Noria <fxn@...> 2012/03/21

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:

[#393961] Re: What’s the best way to check if a feature/class has been loaded? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2012/03/21

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 20:48, Xavier Noria <fxn@hashref.com> wrote:

[#393962] Re: What’s the best way to check if a feature/class has been loaded? — Xavier Noria <fxn@...> 2012/03/21

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:

[#393967] Re: What’s the best way to check if a feature/class has been loaded? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2012/03/22

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 22:11, Xavier Noria <fxn@hashref.com> wrote:

[#393969] Re: What’s the best way to check if a feature/class has been loaded? — Xavier Noria <fxn@...> 2012/03/22

On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:

[#394154] uninitialized constant SOCKSSocket — Resident Moron <lists@...>

I am running ruby 1.9.3 on a linux box. I would like to use

10 messages 2012/03/29

[#394160] Why z = Complex(1,2) rather than z = Complex.new(1,2)? — Ori Ben-Dor <lists@...>

What's this syntax, z = Complex(1,2), as opposed to z =

14 messages 2012/03/29

[#394175] shoes no such file to load -- rubygems — Mr theperson <lists@...>

I have installed shoes to develop GUI applications but when I try and

13 messages 2012/03/29

[#394201] Can't open url with a subdomain with an underscore — Jeroen van Ingen <lists@...>

I try to open the following URL: http://auto_diversen.marktplaza.nl/

10 messages 2012/03/30

[#394222] Ruby openssl ECC help plz — no name <lists@...>

I am confused on how to properly export public ECC key. I can see it

13 messages 2012/03/31

Re: Configuration Convention

From: Intransition <transfire@...>
Date: 2012-03-06 17:07:22 UTC
List: ruby-talk #393744

On Tuesday, March 6, 2012 11:02:42 AM UTC-5, short...@googlemail.com wrote:
>
> Thomas Sawyer wrote in post #1050299:
> > Now, obviously not all of these will apply to every project. But I can
> > imagine that given enough time and a rather thorough developer, a
> > project could acquire configurations for a couple dozen tools. Think
> > code
> > coverage, code analysis, IDE/RAD configuration, etc. I suspect there is
> > a
> > saturation point --at some point it just becomes too much to remember.
>
> Why remember?  Files are in the file system or VCS repository where you
> can find them.  I am not sure I understand the issue you are having.
>
 
I just mean remembering all the tools, how to use them, configure them and 
what they are for.

 

> > Even
> > so, it could amount to quite a few files, well exceeding the number of
> > toplevel "meat" files of a project.
>
> I don't see why this should be a problem.  Even more so: why are these
> configuration files not "meat"?  That would mean you could have the
> project without them and not lose anything.  I doubt that.  Reminds me
> of people coming out of a meeting and saying "now off to some _real_
> work" - that's just nonsense as communication is a large part of our
> profession - as much as hacking.
>
Think of it this way. The files that change the most are the `lib/` and 
`test/` files. But they are not given the "prime real-estate" of top-level 
files. Rather they are categorized into an allotted subdirectory. 
(Interestingly C projects actually do put source files at the top). So why 
are config files, which rarely change once properly configured, always in 
our face? And if that wasn't the point why are they more often dotfiles 
which are intended to be *hidden*? Maybe if they were actually hidden, but 
except for using `ls` every other tool I use pretty much shows them. So 
they aren't really.

In the end I'd prefer to see a dedicated directory that became the 
convention, and baring that at least just stop with all the .dotfiles and 
Configfiles and just use regular old files. Let `Gemfile` be `gemfile.rb` 
and `.yardopts` be `yardopts.txt`, etc.

In This Thread