[#8478] resolv.rb -- doc patch. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
This is an attempt to get the RD format docs for resolv.rb into
[#8484] strptime fails to properly parse certain inputs — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #5263, was opened at 2006-08-01 23:14
Hi,
Hi,
nobu@ruby-lang.org wrote:
Why bother other languages? They are on their own. We should not
[#8497] Ruby Socket to support SCTP? — Philippe Langlois <philippelanglois@...>
Hi,
[#8504] TCPSocket: bind method missing — hadmut@... (Hadmut Danisch)
Hi,
[#8513] patches for the 1.8.5 deadline... — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
As far as I can tell the only patches which I've submitted which
On Aug 3, 2006, at 10:20 AM, Hugh Sasse wrote:
On Fri, 4 Aug 2006, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#8522] IRB change for RDoc workaround — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
RDoc chokes on the following code:
[#8525] rdoc bug? — Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@...>
I think I've found a bug in rdoc's handling of C files. Specifically, it
[#8555] Process.gid= fails on OS X — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #5351, was opened at 2006-08-08 01:56
>>>>> On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 17:56:07 +0900
Hi,
Hi,
>>>>> On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 12:31:07 +0900
Hi,
[#8561] sandbox timers & block scopes — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>
Two puzzles I am trying to solve:
On 8/8/06, why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@whytheluckystiff.net> wrote:
On 8/16/06, Francis Cianfrocca <garbagecat10@gmail.com> wrote:
raise ThisDecayingInquisition, "anyone? anyone at all?"
On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 00:35 +0900, why the lucky stiff wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 02:46:30AM +0900, MenTaLguY wrote:
On 8/15/06, why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@whytheluckystiff.net> wrote:
On 8/15/06, Charles O Nutter <headius@headius.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 04:14:33AM +0900, Charles O Nutter wrote:
On 8/15/06, why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@whytheluckystiff.net> wrote:
Hi,
[#8568] Pathname.to_a — Marc Haisenko <haisenko@...>
Hi folks,
[#8585] RDoc: extensions spread across multiple C files — Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@...>
Hi,
Tilman Sauerbeck [2006-08-11 00:39]:
[#8593] ri problem with the latest ruby_1_8 — "Kent Sibilev" <ksruby@...>
Does anyone know why for some strange reason ri doesn't know about any
On Aug 11, 2006, at 10:55 AM, Kent Sibilev wrote:
[#8608] Another ri problem (ruby_1_8 branch) — "Kent Sibilev" <ksruby@...>
I've noticed that many builtin Ruby classes don't have descriptions:
On Aug 12, 2006, at 11:45 PM, Kent Sibilev wrote:
On 8/15/06, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
[#8609] Again Range=== bug — Ondrej Bilka <neleai@...>
Problem of discrete membership at Range#=== is that it returns unexpected
[#8616] invalid test in "sudo make install-doc"? — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #5415, was opened at 2006-08-14 12:01
[#8662] NODE_WHEN inside a case else body — "Dominik Bathon" <dbatml@...>
Hi,
[#8690] a ruby-core primer — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>
Hello, all. I've been working on the ruby-core page for the new Ruby site.
On 8/22/06, why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@whytheluckystiff.net> wrote:
On 8/24/06, Dave Howell <groups+2006@howell.seattle.wa.us> wrote:
[#8709] More ri-problems (ruby_1_8 branch again) — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...>
Hi!
[#8735] Legal operator symbols — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...>
Why are :>, :>=, :<=, :< fine as symbols, while := isn't?
Hi --
[#8758] sandbox r50, here we go, loading conflicting gems — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>
Checky.
sandbox r50, here we go, loading conflicting gems
Checky.
require 'sandbox'
hpricot = Sandbox.new :init => [:all]
hpricot.eval(%{
require 'rubygems'
require_gem 'hpricot', '=0.4.47'
require 'hpricot'
puts Hpricot("<a class=test>link</a>").search(".test")
})
hpricot2 = Sandbox.new :init => [:all]
hpricot2.eval(%{
require 'rubygems'
require_gem 'hpricot', '=0.4'
require 'hpricot'
puts Hpricot("<a class=test>link</a>").search(".test")
})
This proves existence of a bug in Hpricot 0.4, which was extinguished in 0.4.47.
The output is:
<a class="test">link</a>
/home/why/sand/RUBY-1_8_5/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/hpricot-0.4/lib/hpricot/traverse.rb:110:in
`_eval': NoMethodError: undefined method `[]=' for #<MatchData:0x8510448>
(Sandbox::Exception)
from ./lib/sandbox.rb:19:in `eval'
from test.rb:21
In other words, 0.4.47 finds the link, but 0.4 raises the MatchData exception.
This new version requires a new patch. Indeed, swapping ruby_cref was the
finishing touch. Be aware, some globals and constants are not yet implemented.
_why
Attachments (1)
diff -wur ruby-1.8.5/eval.c ruby-1.8.5-top_cref_exposed/eval.c
--- ruby-1.8.5/eval.c Sun Aug 6 21:43:39 2006
+++ ruby-1.8.5-top_cref_exposed/eval.c Wed Aug 30 12:46:07 2006
@@ -1061,8 +1061,8 @@
#define POP_CLASS() ruby_class = _class; \
} while (0)
-static NODE *ruby_cref = 0;
-static NODE *top_cref;
+NODE *ruby_cref = 0;
+NODE *top_cref;
#define PUSH_CREF(c) ruby_cref = NEW_NODE(NODE_CREF,(c),0,ruby_cref)
#define POP_CREF() ruby_cref = ruby_cref->nd_next
diff -wur ruby-1.8.5/node.h ruby-1.8.5-top_cref_exposed/node.h
--- ruby-1.8.5/node.h Mon Feb 13 02:10:53 2006
+++ ruby-1.8.5-top_cref_exposed/node.h Wed Aug 30 12:46:21 2006
@@ -151,6 +151,9 @@
} u3;
} NODE;
+extern NODE *ruby_cref;
+extern NODE *top_cref;
+
#define RNODE(obj) (R_CAST(RNode)(obj))
#define nd_type(n) ((int)(((RNODE(n))->flags>>FL_USHIFT)&0xff))