From: Hugh Sasse Date: 2006-08-08T18:31:13+09:00 Subject: Re: patches for the 1.8.5 deadline... On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Eric Hodel wrote: > On Aug 7, 2006, at 4:28 AM, Hugh Sasse wrote: > > On Sat, 5 Aug 2006, Eric Hodel wrote: > > > > > Ok, I have checked in to both HEAD and 1_8. Please review for any errors. > > > > Thank you. That all looks to be as I wished. It looks like you > > have added more .document information than I could supply because > > lots of names I've not seen show up in the rdoc process. > > Curious. For some reason the .document file never merges correctly, so I had > to do it by hand. I don't think I missed anything or added anything extra. No, by "I've not seen" I meant "areas of the source I've never got round to looking at, didn't know about, so never added to any .document files myself". i.e, thanks for being thorough. > > > On my system I get the following errors (which I don't know how to > > fix and probably don't matter for now): > > > > process.c: mmmmc.............................. > > No definition for proc_getpgrp > > .......................................................... > > random.c: .. > > drb.rb: > > mccc..m.cccc...c.c.....c...c........m..... > > lib/drb/drb.rb:796:27: Skipping require of dynamic string: "drb/#{$1}" > > This is just an RDoc warning. I should make it only show in RDoc's verbose > mode, but I don't know if RDoc has one of those. > > > c.................mcc.............c.....c....................ccc................ > > eq.rb: mc.. > > ostruct.rb: c.....c > > lib/ostruct.rb:75:43: ':' not followed by identified or operator > > Same. > > > .... > > parsearg.rb: ..... > > socket.c: ccccccccccm. > > No definition for bsock_do_not_rev_lookup > > [...] > > I'm not sure what to do about these, I haven't looked into why they show up. > It might mean the documentation is missing, so maybe it will get somebody to > write it. Fine. It can wait a while more then. Thanks. > Hugh