From: Kent Sibilev <ksruby@...>
Date: 2006-08-22T14:45:58+09:00
Subject: Re: Another ri problem #2 (ruby_1_8 branch)

Anyone?

On 8/16/06, Kent Sibilev <ksruby@gmail.com> wrote:
> $ ri --system -T IO | tail -10
>
> Instance methods:
>      <<, binmode, block_scanf, close, close_read, close_write, closed?,
>      each, each_byte, each_line, eof, eof?, fcntl, fileno, flush,
>      fsync, getc, gets, inspect, ioctl, isatty, lineno, lineno=, pid,
>      pos, pos=, print, printf, putc, puts, read, read_nonblock,
>      readbytes, readchar, readline, readlines, readpartial, reopen,
>      rewind, scanf, seek, soak_up_spaces, stat, sync, sync=, sysread,
>      sysseek, syswrite, tell, to_i, to_io, tty?, ungetc, write,
>      write_nonblock
>
>
> Notice that this listing contains two private methods block_scanf and
> soak_up_spaces defined in lib/scanf.rb
>
> --
> Kent
> ---
> http://www.datanoise.com
>
>


-- 
Kent
---
http://www.datanoise.com