From: Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
Date: 2006-08-23T02:36:26+09:00
Subject: Re: Another ri problem #2 (ruby_1_8 branch)

On Aug 21, 2006, at 10:45 PM, Kent Sibilev wrote:
> On 8/16/06, Kent Sibilev <ksruby@gmail.com> wrote:
>> $ ri --system -T IO | tail -10
>>
>> Instance methods:
>>      <<, binmode, block_scanf, close, close_read, close_write,  
>> closed?,
>>      each, each_byte, each_line, eof, eof?, fcntl, fileno, flush,
>>      fsync, getc, gets, inspect, ioctl, isatty, lineno, lineno=, pid,
>>      pos, pos=, print, printf, putc, puts, read, read_nonblock,
>>      readbytes, readchar, readline, readlines, readpartial, reopen,
>>      rewind, scanf, seek, soak_up_spaces, stat, sync, sync=, sysread,
>>      sysseek, syswrite, tell, to_i, to_io, tty?, ungetc, write,
>>      write_nonblock
>>
>>
>> Notice that this listing contains two private methods block_scanf and
>> soak_up_spaces defined in lib/scanf.rb
>
> Anyone?

I think this is too close to 1.8.5 to fix.  private should work  
correctly there, but it is not.

-- 
Eric Hodel - drbrain@segment7.net - http://blog.segment7.net

A: Yes
Q: Is top-posting bad?
  � Derek Milhous Zumsteg