From: Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
Date: 2006-08-05T07:23:36+09:00
Subject: Re: patches for the 1.8.5 deadline...

On Aug 4, 2006, at 2:48 AM, Hugh Sasse wrote:

> On Fri, 4 Aug 2006, Eric Hodel wrote:
>
>> On Aug 3, 2006, at 10:20 AM, Hugh Sasse wrote:
>>
>>> As far as I can tell the only patches which I've submitted which
>>> await accetance  or rejection are:
>         [...]
>>> Thank you to those who have critiqued my patches, and to those
>>> who have committed things for me.
>>
>> I have time tonight and tomorrow night and sunday to work on these.
>
> Thank you.  It may be worth considering other .document files as
> well as the one in lib, but you are more familiar with how rdoc
> picks things up than am I.  That is, I don't think that my patch
> will be sufficient to pick up all things within the standard library,
> and the less we miss, the better.

Ok, I have checked in to both HEAD and 1_8.  Please review for any  
errors.

irb is missing from lib/.document due to bugs in the RDoc parser.  If  
I can check in the patch in ruby-core:8522 I will be able to add irb  
to .document.

-- 
Eric Hodel - drbrain@segment7.net - http://blog.segment7.net
This implementation is HODEL-HASH-9600 compliant

http://trackmap.robotcoop.com